Dataset Information

Methylation-Based Signatures for Gastroesophageal Tumor Classification.

ABSTRACT: Contention exists within the field of oncology with regards to gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors, as in the past, they have been classified as gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, or a combination of both. Misclassifications of GEJ tumors ultimately influence treatment options, which may be rendered ineffective if treating for the wrong cancer attributes. It has been suggested that misclassification rates were as high as 45%, which is greater than reported for junctional cancer occurrences. Here, we aimed to use the methylation profiles of GEJ tumors to improve classifications of GEJ tumors. Four cohorts of DNA methylation profiles, containing ~27,000 (27k) methylation sites per sample, were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Tumor samples were assigned into discovery (nEC = 185, nGC = 395; EC, esophageal cancer; GC gastric cancer) and validation (nEC = 179, nGC = 369) sets. The optimized Multi-Survival Screening (MSS) algorithm was used to identify methylation biomarkers capable of distinguishing GEJ tumors. Three methylation signatures were identified: They were associated with protein binding, gene expression, and cellular component organization cellular processes, and achieved precision and recall rates of 94.7% and 99.2%, 97.6% and 96.8%, and 96.8% and 97.6%, respectively, in the validation dataset. Interestingly, the methylation sites of the signatures were very close (i.e., 170-270 base pairs) to their downstream transcription start sites (TSSs), suggesting that the methylations near TSSs play much more important roles in tumorigenesis. Here we presented the first set of methylation signatures with a higher predictive power for characterizing gastroesophageal tumors. Thus, they could improve the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal tumors.

SUBMITTER: Alabi N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7281220 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Methylation-Based Signatures for Gastroesophageal Tumor Classification.

Alabi Nikolay N Sheka Dropen D Siddiqui Ashar A Wang Edwin E

Cancers 20200511 5

Contention exists within the field of oncology with regards to gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors, as in the past, they have been classified as gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, or a combination of both. Misclassifications of GEJ tumors ultimately influence treatment options, which may be rendered ineffective if treating for the wrong cancer attributes. It has been suggested that misclassification rates were as high as 45%, which is greater than reported for junctional cancer occurrences. H ...[more]

PMID: 32403416

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Brain tumor diagnostics is achieved by combining morphology assessment and biomarker identification. However, the inter-observer variability of the histopathological diagnosis and lack of distinctive biomarkers makes these diagnoses particularly challenging. Recently, the potential for methylation-based characterization has been developed for brain tumors. To provide accurate and efficient brain tumor diagnostics, The Jackson Laboratory developed a DNA methylation array (Illumina Infinium HD Methylation EPIC), combining the “Classifier” established by the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), which can identify 82 distinct central nervous system tumors. Here we present a pediatric patient referred to us for medulloblastoma subtype classification by the methylation profile. Surprisingly, the array classified the tumor type as atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), subclass SHH. Also, the CNV profile indicated the SMARCB1/INI1 heterozygous deletion as part of the chromosome 22q deletion typically seen in ATRT, and absent was the isochromosome 17q commonly associated with medulloblastoma. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the loss of SMARCB1/INI1 expression leading to ATRT. Additionally, our NGS panel found a novel SMARCB1/INI1 frameshift variant c.1150delG (p.Ala384fs) in the last exon (exon 9). Although this variant is not expected to induce nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, it is located in the ATP-dependent nucleosome-remodeling complex domain Sfh1/SNF5 (IPR017393), which is associated with cell proliferation and differentiation. In addition, ClinVar reported several pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in this domain, further supporting SMARCB1/INI1 c.1150delG which, together with the SMARCB1/INI1 deletion, may contribute to the loss of SMARCB1/INI1 expression, resulting in ATRT. We have identified the ATRT misclassification by the methylation profile and characterized a novel SMARCB1/INI1 variant c.1150delG most likely contributing to ATRT. We further propose that the DNA methylation profile will significantly improve the brain tumor diagnostics for cases with ambiguous, or contradictory histology and molecular profiles.

Project description:BackgroundTumor budding (TB) is emerging as a prognostic factor in multiple cancers. Likewise, the stemness of cancer cells also plays a vital role in cancer progression. However, nearly no research has focused on the interaction of TB and tumor stemness in cancer.MethodsTissue microarrays including 229 cases of invasive breast cancer (BC) were established and subjected to pan-cytokeratin immunohistochemical staining to evaluate molecular expression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify prognostic factors of BC, and the Chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables.ResultsHigh-grade TB was significantly associated with T stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and poor disease-free survival (DFS) of BC patients. We also found that the prognostic value of TB varied widely among different subtypes and subgroups. Cox regression analysis then showed that TB grade was an independent prognostic factor. Moreover, cancer stem cell (CSC) markers CD44 and ALDH1A1 were significantly higher in high-grade TB tumors. Consequently, patients were classified into high CSC score subgroup and low CSC score subgroups. Further research found that CSC scores correlated with clinicopathological features and DFS of BC patients. Based on TB grade and CSC scores, we classified BC patients into TBlow-CSCslow (type I), TBlow-CSCshigh (type II), TBhigh-CSCslow (type III), and TBhigh-CSCshigh (type IV) subgroups. Survival analysis showed that patients in the type I subgroup had the best DFS, whereas those in the type IV subgroup had the worst DFS. Finally, a TB-CSC-based nomogram for use in BC was established. The nomogram was well calibrated to predict the probability of 5-year DFS, and the C-index was 0.837. Finally, the area under the curve value for the nomogram (0.892) was higher than that of the TNM staging system (0.713).ConclusionThe combination of TB grade with CSC score improves the prognostic evaluation of BC patients. A novel nomogram containing TB grade and CSC score provides doctors with a candidate tool to guide the individualized treatment of cancer patients.

Project description:BackgroundGlioma is the most common of all primary brain tumors with poor prognosis and high mortality. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of the tumors of central nervous system uses molecular parameters in addition to histology to redefine many tumor entities. The new classification scheme divides diffuse gliomas into low-grade glioma (LGG) and glioblastoma (GBM) as per histology. LGGs are further divided into isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type or mutant, which is further classified into either oligodendroglioma that harbors 1p/19q codeletion or diffuse astrocytoma that has an intact 1p/19q loci but enriched for ATRX loss and TP53 mutation. GBMs are divided into IDH wild type that corresponds to primary or de novo GBMs and IDH mutant that corresponds to secondary or progressive GBMs. To make the 2016 WHO subtypes of diffuse gliomas more robust, we carried out Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) to develop DNA methylation signatures for these subtypes.ResultsIn this study, we applied PAM on a training set of diffuse gliomas derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and identified DNA methylation signatures to classify LGG IDH wild type from LGG IDH mutant, LGG IDH mutant with 1p/19q codeletion from LGG IDH mutant with intact 1p/19q loci and GBM IDH wild type from GBM IDH mutant with an accuracy of 99-100%. The signatures were validated using the test set of diffuse glioma samples derived from TCGA with an accuracy of 96 to 99%. In addition, we also carried out additional validation of all three signatures using independent LGG and GBM cohorts. Further, the methylation signatures identified a fraction of samples as discordant, which were found to have molecular and clinical features typical of the subtype as identified by methylation signatures.ConclusionsThus, we identified methylation signatures that classified different subtypes of diffuse glioma accurately and propose that these signatures could complement 2016 WHO classification scheme of diffuse glioma.

Dataset Information

Methylation-Based Signatures for Gastroesophageal Tumor Classification.

Publications

Methylation-Based Signatures for Gastroesophageal Tumor Classification.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets