Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

16 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Deep Statistical Model Checking

ABSTRACT: Neural networks (NN) are taking over ever more decisions thus far taken by humans, even though verifiable system-level guarantees are far out of reach. Neither is the verification technology available, nor is it even understood what a formal, meaningful, extensible, and scalable testbed might look like for such a technology. The present paper is a modest attempt to improve on both the above aspects. We present a family of formal models that contain basic features of automated decision making contexts and which can be extended with further orthogonal features, ultimately encompassing the scope of autonomous driving. Due to the possibility to model random noise in the decision actuation, each model instance induces a Markov decision process (MDP) as verification object. The NN in this context has the duty to actuate (near-optimal) decisions. From the verification perspective, the externally learnt NN serves as a determinizer of the MDP, the result being a Markov chain which as such is amenable to statistical model checking. The combination of a MDP and a NN encoding the action policy is central to what we call “deep statistical model checking” (DSMC). While being a straightforward extension of statistical model checking, it enables to gain deep insight into questions like “how high is the NN-induced safety risk?”, “how good is the NN compared to the optimal policy?” (obtained by model checking the MDP), or “does further training improve the NN?”. We report on an implementation of DSMC inside TheModestToolset in combination with externally learnt NNs, demonstrating the potential of DSMC on various instances of the model family.

SUBMITTER: Gotsman A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7281856 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Formal Verification of Heuristic Autonomous Intersection Management Using Statistical Model Checking.

Project description:Autonomous vehicles are gaining popularity throughout the world among researchers and consumers. However, their popularity has not yet reached the level where it is widely accepted as a fully developed technology as a large portion of the consumer base feels skeptical about it. Proving the correctness of this technology will help in establishing faith in it. That is easier said than done because of the fact that the formal verification techniques has not attained the level of development and application that it is ought to. In this work, we present Statistical Model Checking (SMC) as a possible solution for verifying the safety of autonomous systems and algorithms. We apply it on Heuristic Autonomous Intersection Management (HAIM) algorithm. The presented verification routine can be adopted for other conflict point based autonomous intersection management algorithms as well. Along with verifying the HAIM, we also demonstrate the modeling and verification applied at each stage of development to verify the inherent behavior of the algorithm. The HAIM scheme is formally modeled using a variant of the language of Timed Automata. The model consists of automata that encode the behavior of vehicles, intersection manager (IM) and collision checkers. To verify the complete nature of the heuristic and ensure correct modeling of the system, we model it in layers and verify each layer separately for their expected behavior. Along with that, we perform implementation verification and error injection testing to ensure faithful modeling of the system. Results show with high confidence the freedom from collisions of the intersection controlled by the HAIM algorithm.

| S-EPMC7472046 | biostudies-literature

Model-checking ecological state-transition graphs.

Project description:Model-checking is a methodology developed in computer science to automatically assess the dynamics of discrete systems, by checking if a system modelled as a state-transition graph satisfies a dynamical property written as a temporal logic formula. The dynamics of ecosystems have been drawn as state-transition graphs for more than a century, ranging from state-and-transition models to assembly graphs. Model-checking can provide insights into both empirical data and theoretical models, as long as they sum up into state-transition graphs. While model-checking proved to be a valuable tool in systems biology, it remains largely underused in ecology apart from precursory applications. This article proposes to address this situation, through an inventory of existing ecological STGs and an accessible presentation of the model-checking methodology. This overview is illustrated by the application of model-checking to assess the dynamics of a vegetation pathways model. We select management scenarios by model-checking Computation Tree Logic formulas representing management goals and built from a proposed catalogue of patterns. In discussion, we sketch bridges between existing studies in ecology and available model-checking frameworks. In addition to the automated analysis of ecological state-transition graphs, we believe that defining ecological concepts with temporal logics could help clarify and compare them.

| S-EPMC9203009 | biostudies-literature

Probabilistic model checking of cancer metabolism.

Project description:Cancer cell metabolism is often deregulated as a result of adaption to meeting energy and biosynthesis demands of rapid growth or direct mutation of key metabolic enzymes. Better understanding of such deregulation can provide new insights on targetable vulnerabilities, but is complicated by the difficulty in probing cell metabolism at different levels of resolution and under different experimental conditions. We construct computational models of glucose and glutamine metabolism with focus on the effect of IDH1/2-mutations in cancer using a combination of experimental metabolic flux data and patient-derived gene expression data. Our models demonstrate the potential of computational exploration to reveal biologic behavior: they show that an exogenously-mutated IDH1 experimental model utilizes glutamine as an alternative carbon source for lactate production under hypoxia, but does not fully-recapitulate the patient phenotype under normoxia. We also demonstrate the utility of using gene expression data as a proxy for relative differences in metabolic activity. We use the approach of probabilistic model checking and the freely-available Probabilistic Symbolic Model Checker to construct and reason about model behavior.

| S-EPMC9640632 | biostudies-literature

Using chemical organization theory for model checking.

Project description:MOTIVATION: The increasing number and complexity of biomodels makes automatic procedures for checking the models' properties and quality necessary. Approaches like elementary mode analysis, flux balance analysis, deficiency analysis and chemical organization theory (OT) require only the stoichiometric structure of the reaction network for derivation of valuable information. In formalisms like Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), however, information about the stoichiometric coefficients required for an analysis of chemical organizations can be hidden in kinetic laws. RESULTS: First, we introduce an algorithm that uncovers stoichiometric information that might be hidden in the kinetic laws of a reaction network. This allows us to apply OT to SBML models using modifiers. Second, using the new algorithm, we performed a large-scale analysis of the 185 models contained in the manually curated BioModels Database. We found that for 41 models (22%) the set of organizations changes when modifiers are considered correctly. We discuss one of these models in detail (BIOMD149, a combined model of the ERK- and Wnt-signaling pathways), whose set of organizations drastically changes when modifiers are considered. Third, we found inconsistencies in 5 models (3%) and identified their characteristics. Compared with flux-based methods, OT is able to identify those species and reactions more accurately [in 26 cases (14%)] that can be present in a long-term simulation of the model. We conclude that our approach is a valuable tool that helps to improve the consistency of biomodels and their repositories. AVAILABILITY: All data and a JAVA applet to check SBML-models is available from http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/csb/prj/ot/tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

| S-EPMC2712341 | biostudies-literature

Model checking to assess T-helper cell plasticity.

Project description:Computational modeling constitutes a crucial step toward the functional understanding of complex cellular networks. In particular, logical modeling has proven suitable for the dynamical analysis of large signaling and transcriptional regulatory networks. In this context, signaling input components are generally meant to convey external stimuli, or environmental cues. In response to such external signals, cells acquire specific gene expression patterns modeled in terms of attractors (e.g., stable states). The capacity for cells to alter or reprogram their differentiated states upon changes in environmental conditions is referred to as cell plasticity. In this article, we present a multivalued logical framework along with computational methods recently developed to efficiently analyze large models. We mainly focus on a symbolic model checking approach to investigate switches between attractors subsequent to changes of input conditions. As a case study, we consider the cellular network regulating the differentiation of T-helper (Th) cells, which orchestrate many physiological and pathological immune responses. To account for novel cellular subtypes, we present an extended version of a published model of Th cell differentiation. We then use symbolic model checking to analyze reachability properties between Th subtypes upon changes of environmental cues. This allows for the construction of a synthetic view of Th cell plasticity in terms of a graph connecting subtypes with arcs labeled by input conditions. Finally, we explore novel strategies enabling specific Th cell polarizing or reprograming events.

| S-EPMC4309205 | biostudies-literature

Dartagnan: Bounded Model Checking for Weak Memory Models (Competition Contribution)

Project description:Dartagnanis a bounded model checker for concurrent programs under weak memory models. What makes it different from other tools is that the memory model is not hard-coded inside Dartagnanbut taken as part of the input. For SV-COMP’20, we take as input sequential consistency (i.e. the standard interleaving memory model) extended by support for atomic blocks. Our point is to demonstrate that a universal tool can be competitive and perform well in SV-COMP. Being a bounded model checker, Dartagnan’s focus is on disproving safety properties by finding counterexample executions. For programs with bounded loops, Dartagnanperforms an iterative unwinding that results in a complete analysis. The SV-COMP’20 version of Dartagnanworks on Boogiecode. The C programs of the competition are translated internally to Boogieusing SMACK.

| S-EPMC7480687 | biostudies-literature

Approximating Attractors of Boolean Networks by Iterative CTL Model Checking.

Project description:This paper introduces the notion of approximating asynchronous attractors of Boolean networks by minimal trap spaces. We define three criteria for determining the quality of an approximation: "faithfulness" which requires that the oscillating variables of all attractors in a trap space correspond to their dimensions, "univocality" which requires that there is a unique attractor in each trap space, and "completeness" which requires that there are no attractors outside of a given set of trap spaces. Each is a reachability property for which we give equivalent model checking queries. Whereas faithfulness and univocality can be decided by model checking the corresponding subnetworks, the naive query for completeness must be evaluated on the full state space. Our main result is an alternative approach which is based on the iterative refinement of an initially poor approximation. The algorithm detects so-called autonomous sets in the interaction graph, variables that contain all their regulators, and considers their intersection and extension in order to perform model checking on the smallest possible state spaces. A benchmark, in which we apply the algorithm to 18 published Boolean networks, is given. In each case, the minimal trap spaces are faithful, univocal, and complete, which suggests that they are in general good approximations for the asymptotics of Boolean networks.

| S-EPMC4562258 | biostudies-literature

A model checking method for the proportional hazards model with recurrent gap time data.

Project description:Recurrent events are the natural outcome in many medical and epidemiology studies. To assess covariate effects on the gaps between consecutive recurrent events, the Cox proportional hazards model is frequently employed in data analysis. The validity of statistical inference, however, depends on the appropriateness of the Cox model. In this paper, we propose a class of graphical techniques and formal tests for checking the Cox model with recurrent gap time data. The building block of our model checking method is an averaged martingale-like process, based on which a class of multiparameter stochastic processes is proposed. This maneuver is very general and can be used to assess different aspects of model fit. Numerical simulations are conducted to examine finite-sample performance, and the proposed model checking techniques are illustrated with data from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register.

| S-EPMC3138070 | biostudies-literature

Unsupervised single-particle deep classification via statistical manifold learning

Project description: Not available

| EMPIAR-10069 | biostudies-other

Exact acceleration of complex real-time model checking based on overlapping cycle.

Project description:When real-time systems are modeled as timed automata, different time scales may lead to substantial fragmentation of the symbolic state space. Exact acceleration solves the fragmentation problem without changing system reachability. The relatively mature technology of exact acceleration has been used with an appended cycle or a parking cycle, which can be applied to the calculation of a single acceleratable cycle model. Using these two technologies to develop a complex real-time model requires additional states and consumes a large amount of time cost, thereby influencing acceleration efficiency. In this paper, a complex real-time exact acceleration method based on an overlapping cycle is proposed, which is an application scenario extension of the parking-cycle technique. By comprehensively analyzing the accelerating impacts of multiple acceleratable cycles, it is only necessary to add a single overlapping period with a fixed length without relying on the windows of acceleratable cycles. Experimental results show that the proposed timed automaton model is simple and effectively decreases the time costs of exact acceleration. For the complex real-time system model, the method based on an overlapping cycle can accelerate the large scale and concurrent states which cannot be solved by the original exact acceleration theory.

| S-EPMC7924618 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data