Dataset Information

'Power plays plus push': experts' insights into the development and implementation of active tuberculosis case-finding policies globally, a qualitative study.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To explore experts' views on factors influencing national and global active case-finding (ACF) policy development and implementation, and the use of evidence in these processes. DESIGN:This is an exploratory study based on semistructured expert interviews. Framework analysis was applied. PARTICIPANTS:The study involved a purposive sample of 39 experts from international, non-governmental and non-profit organisations, funders, government institutions, international societies, think tanks, universities and research institutions worldwide. RESULTS:This study highlighted the perceived need among experts for different types of evidence for ACF policy development and implementation, and for stakeholder engagement including researchers and policymakers to foster evidence use. Interviewees stressed the influence of government, donor and non-governmental stakeholders in ACF policy development. Such key stakeholders also influence ACF policy implementation, in addition to available systems and processes in a given health system, and implementers' motivation and incentives. According to the interviewees, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for systematic screening face the innate challenge of providing guidance to countries across the broad area of ACF in terms of target groups, settings and screening algorithms. The guidelines could be improved by focusing on what should be done rather than what can be done in ACF, and by providing howto examples. Leadership, integration into health systems and long-term financing are key for ACF to be sustainable. CONCLUSIONS:We provide new insights into ACF policy processes globally, particularly regarding facilitators for and barriers to ACF policy development, evidence need and use, and donor organisations' influence. According to expert participants, national and global ACF policy development and implementation can be improved by broadening stakeholder engagement. Meanwhile, using diverse evidence to inform ACF policy development and implementation could mitigate the 'power plays plus push' that might otherwise disrupt and mislead these policy processes.

SUBMITTER: Biermann O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7282330 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

'Power plays plus push': experts' insights into the development and implementation of active tuberculosis case-finding policies globally, a qualitative study.

Biermann Olivia O Atkins Salla S Lönnroth Knut K Caws Maxine M Viney Kerri K

BMJ open 20200603 6

<h4>Objective</h4>To explore experts' views on factors influencing national and global active case-finding (ACF) policy development and implementation, and the use of evidence in these processes.<h4>Design</h4>This is an exploratory study based on semistructured expert interviews. Framework analysis was applied.<h4>Participants</h4>The study involved a purposive sample of 39 experts from international, non-governmental and non-profit organisations, funders, government institutions, international ...[more]

PMID: 32499270

Similar Datasets

Project description:There is a need to move from binary hazard assessment to more quantitative assessment of genotoxicity to better inform human health risk assessment and understand the relevance of positive in vitro genotoxicity findings. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including transcriptomic biomarkers combined with high-throughput technologies, enable the testing of a broad concentration range, which allows quantitative assessment of in vitro results. Initial work with the transcriptomic GENOMARK and TGx-DDI biomarkers demonstrate their potential use for hazard identification and chemical prioritization; however, no study has evaluated the concordance and complementarity of GENOMARK and TGx-DDI. The overall aim of this study is to examine if a combined approach of integrating both transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity in human relevant HepaRGTM cells increases the certainty in hazard calls and potency rankings of chemicals. A sub-aim is to investigate whether GENOMARK is applicable to the TempO-Seq® high-throughput sequencing technology, to collect concentration-response data to rapidly perform hazard classification and potency ranking. Therefore, HepaRGTM cells were exposed to 10 chemicals (i.e. eight known in vivo genotoxicants and two in vivo non-genotoxicants) in increasing concentrations over 72h. TempO-Seq® was used to obtain concentration-response data for both biomarkers. Benchmark concentration (BMC) modelling of chemicals that were classified positive was conducted to obtain BMCs and transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for potency ranking. The results confirm that GENOMARK is applicable to TempO-Seq® since it achieved 100% predictive accuracy. In addition, a high concordance was observed in the hazard classifications and potency rankings between both biomarkers. Overall, our findings show that in vitro transcriptomic data can be used to rapidly and effectively identify genotoxic hazards while simultaneously providing additional insights on potency that is more informative in a modern hazard assessment paradigm. The results of this case study support the high value of integrating these NAMs in a weight of evidence evaluation of genotoxicity using the important human-liver cell line.

Project description:BackgroundHousehold smoke-free home rules cannot fully protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke (SHS) if they live in multi-unit housing (MUH). Instead, property-level smoke-free policies are needed to prevent SHS incursion into apartment units and to keep common areas smoke-free. Smoke-free policies are usually at the discretion of property management companies and owners within the context of market-rate and privately-owned affordable housing in the U.S.MethodsSemi-structured interviews on the policy development, implementation and enforcement experiences of 21 different privately-owned affordable housing management companies were conducted with representatives from properties in North Carolina and Georgia who had established smoke-free policies before 2016.ResultsThe decision to adopt was typically made by corporate leadership, board members, owners or property managers, with relatively little resident input. Policy details were influenced by property layout, perceptions of how best to facilitate compliance and enforcement, and cost of creating a designated smoking area. Policies were implemented through inclusion in leases, lease addenda or house rules with 6 months' notice most common. Participants thought having a written policy, the norms and culture of the housing community, public norms for smoke-free environments, and resident awareness of the rules and their consequences, aided with compliance. Violations were identified through routine inspections of units and resident reporting. Resident denial and efforts to hide smoking were shared as challenges to enforcement, along with a perception that concrete evidence would be needed in eviction court and that simply the smell of SHS was insufficient evidence of violation. Over half had terminated leases or evicted residents due to violations of the smoke-free policy. The most common benefits cited were reduced turnover cost and time, and lower vacancy rates.ConclusionsUnderstanding the smoke-free policy process in privately-owned affordable housing can help practitioners encourage policies within subsidized housing contexts. The study identified salient benefits (e.g., reduced cost, time, and vacancies) that can be highlighted when encouraging MUH partners to adopt policies. Additionally, study findings provide guidance on what to consider when designing smoke-free policies (e.g., layout, costs), and provide insights into how to enhance compliance (e.g., resident awareness) and manage enforcement (e.g., routine inspections).

Project description:Policy research can reveal gaps and opportunities to enhance policy impact and implementation. In this study, we use a theoretically informed qualitative approach to investigate the implementation of two policies to promote breastfeeding in Vietnam. We conducted semi-structured interviews with national and local policy stakeholders (n = 26) in 2017. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and then translated to English by certified translators. Transcript data were analysed using an integrated conceptual framework of policy implementation. Respondents identified several positive outcomes resulting from implementation of an extended maternity leave policy (Labour Code No. 10/2012/QH13) and further restrictions on marketing of breast milk substitutes (Decree No. 100/2014/ND-CP). Decree No. 100, in particular, was said to have reduced advertising of breast milk substitutes in mass media outlets and healthcare settings. Key implementation actors were national-level bureaucratic actors, local organizations and international partners. Findings reveal the importance of policy precedence and a broader set of policies to promote the rights of women and children to support implementation. Other facilitators were involvement from national-level implementing agencies and healthcare personnel and strength of government relationships and coordination with non-governmental and international organizations. Implementation challenges included insufficient funding, limited training to report violations, a cumbersome reporting process and pervasive misinformation about breast milk and breast milk substitutes. Limited reach for women employed in the informal labour sector and in rural communities was said to be a compatibility issue for the extended maternity leave policy in addition to the lack of impact on non-parental guardians and caretakers. Recommendations to improve policy implementation include designating a role for international organizations in supporting implementation, expanding maternity protections for all working women, building local-level policy knowledge to support enforcement, simplifying Decree No. 100 violation reporting processes and continuing to invest in interventions to facilitate a supportive policy environment in Vietnam.

Dataset Information

'Power plays plus push': experts' insights into the development and implementation of active tuberculosis case-finding policies globally, a qualitative study.

Publications

'Power plays plus push': experts' insights into the development and implementation of active tuberculosis case-finding policies globally, a qualitative study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets