Dataset Information

Role of lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy.

ABSTRACT: The number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) is an independent factor influencing the survival time of patients with bladder cancer (BCa) after radical resection (RC). The present study aimed to investigate the association between the number of LNDs and the survival of patients with BCa at different stages and who underwent RC in the United States of America and China. Records from 17,730 American patients with BCa and 158 Chinese patients with BCa were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and the Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (China) databases, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve and χ² test were used to determine the overall survival time (OS) of patients with BCa. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the effects of LND number on OS. Overall, 13,421 (75.7%) patients were negative for lymph node metastasis (N0) and 4,309 (24.3%) were positive for lymph node metastasis (N+) among the 17,730 American patients with BCa. In the group of 158 Chinese patients, 125 (79.1%) were N0 and 33 (20.9%) were N+. In the American patients, the median number of dissected nodes was 11.0 [interquartile range (IQR)=3.0-21.0] for N0 patients and 14.0 (IQR=8.0-23.0) for N+ patients. The median number of LNDs was 5.0 (IQR=2.0-7.0) for Chinese N0 patients and 5.0 (IQR=1.5-10.5) for Chinese N+ patients. The number of LNDs may therefore be an independent factor associated with survival in patients who underwent RC. Furthermore, a higher number of LNDs was associated with longer OS in patients with BCa [American patients, ≥13 nodes vs. ≤5 nodes, hazard ratio (HR)=0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.59-0.65, P<0.001; Chinese patients, ≥5 nodes vs. ≤1 node, HR=0.27, 95% CI=0.12-0.62, P=0.002]. The number of LNDs in patients with BCa and N+ was higher compared with number of LNDs in patients with BCa and N0 who underwent RC. More extensive LND improved the OS in both the patients from USA and China. Increasing the number of LNDs may therefore be crucial when treating patients with BCa.

SUBMITTER: Wang K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7285989 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis study aims to determine the optimal pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) template for radical cystectomy (RC).MethodsA systematic search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database in December 2021. Articles comparing recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications among patients undergoing limited PLND (lPLND), standard PLND (sPLND), extended PLND (ePLND), or super-extended PLND (sePLND) were included. A Bayesian approach was used for network meta-analysis.ResultsWe included 18 studies in this systematic review, and 17 studies met our criteria for network meta-analysis. We performed meta-analyses and network meta-analyses to investigate the associations between four PLND templates and the RFS, DSS, OS, or postoperative complications. We found that the ePLND group and the sePLND group were associated with better RFS than the sPLND group (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% Credible Interval [CrI]: 0.56 to 0.78) (HR: 0.67, 95% CrI: 0.56 to 0.83) and the lPLND group (HR: 0.67, 95% CrI: 0.50 to 0.91) (HR: 0.70, 95% CrI: 0.49 to 0.99). For RFS, Analysis of the treatment ranking revealed that ePLND had the highest probabilities to be the best template. There was no significant difference between the four templates in DSS, however, analysis of the treatment ranking indicated that sePLND had the highest probabilities to be the best template. And We found that the sePLND group and the ePLND group were associated with better OS than lPLND (HR: 0.58, 95% CrI: 0.36 to 0.95) (HR: 0.63, 95% CrI: 0.41 to 0.94). For OS, analysis of the treatment ranking revealed that sePLND had the highest probabilities to be the best template. The results of meta-analyses and network meta-analyses showed that postoperative complications rates did not differ significantly between any two templates.ConclusionPatients undergoing sePLND and ePLND had better RFS but not better DSS or OS than those undergoing lPLND or sPLND templates, however, RFS did not differ between patients undergoing sePLND or ePLND. Considering that sePLND involves longer operation time, higher risk, and greater degree of difficulty than ePLND, and performing sePLND may not result in better prognosis, so it seems that there is no need for seLPND. We think that ePLND might be the optimal PLND template for RC.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022318475.

Dataset Information

Role of lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets