Dataset Information

Viral Shedding in Recipients of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 Influenza Seasons in the United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The (H1N1)pdm09 live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) strain was changed for the 2017-2018 influenza season to improve viral fitness, following poor protection against (H1N1)pdm09 viruses in 2015-2016. We conducted LAIV virus shedding studies to assess the effect of this change.

Methods

Children aged 2-18 years were recruited to receive LAIV in the 2016-2017 (n = 641) and 2017-2018 (n = 362) influenza seasons. Viruses from nasal swabs taken 1, 3, and 6 days postvaccination were quantified by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and area under the curve titers were determined. Presence and quantity of shedding were compared between strains and seasons with adjustment for age and prior LAIV (n = 436), inactivated seasonal vaccine (n = 100), or (H1N1)pdm09 vaccine (n = 166) receipt.

Results

(H1N1)pdm09 detection (positivity) in 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 (11.2% and 3.9%, respectively) was lower than that of H3N2 (19.7% and 18.7%, respectively) and B/Victoria (28.9% and 33.9%, respectively). (H1N1)pdm09 positivity was higher in 2016-2017 than 2017-2018 (P = .005), but within shedding-positive participants, the (H1N1)pdm09 titer increased in 2017-2018 (P = .02). H3N2 and influenza B titers were similar between seasons. Positivity declined with age, and prior vaccination reduced the likelihood of shedding influenza B but not (H1N1)pdm09.

Conclusions

The (H1N1)pdm09 titer increased in 2017-2018, indicating more efficient virus replication in shedding-positive children than the 2016-2017 strain, although overall positivity was reduced. Age and vaccination history require consideration when correlating virus shedding and protection.

Clinical trials registration

NCT02143882, NCT02866942, and NCT03104790.

SUBMITTER: Jackson D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7286380 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceRecent observational studies report conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), particularly against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of LAIV and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) against laboratory-confirmed influenza.Design, setting, and participantsA test-negative study to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) using population-based, linked, individual-level laboratory, health administrative, and immunization data. Data were obtained from 10?169 children and adolescents aged 2 to 17 years (children) who were tested for influenza in inpatient or outpatient settings during periods when influenza was circulating based on a threshold level of 5% weekly test positivity for the province during the 4 influenza seasons spanning from November 11, 2012, to April 30, 2016, in Alberta, Canada. Logistic regression was used to estimate VE by vaccine type, influenza season, and influenza type and subtype. The relative effectiveness of each vaccine type was assessed by comparing the odds of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection for LAIV recipients with that for IIV recipients.ExposuresThe primary exposure was receipt of LAIV or IIV before testing for influenza.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was influenza case status as determined by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing.ResultsA total of 10 779 respiratory specimens (from 10 169 children) collected and tested for influenza during the 4 influenza seasons were included, with 53.4% from males; the mean (SD) age was 7.0 (4.6) years. Across the 4 influenza seasons, 3161 children tested positive for influenza. Combining the 4 influenza seasons, the adjusted VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 69% (95% CI, 56%-78%) for LAIV compared with 79% (95% CI, 70%-86%) for IIV. Vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) was 36% (95% CI, 14%-53%) for LAIV and 43% (95% CI, 22%-59%) for IIV. Against influenza B, VE was 74% (95% CI, 62%-82%) for LAIV and 56% (95% CI, 41%-66%) for IIV. There were no significant differences in the odds of influenza infection for LAIV recipients compared with IIV recipients except for influenza B during the 2015-2016 season, when LAIV recipients had lower odds of infection than IIV recipients (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.76).Conclusions and relevanceThere was no evidence to support the lack of effectiveness of LAIV against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. These results support administration of either vaccine type in this age group.