Dataset Information

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The traditional way to estimate variance components (VC) is based on the animal model using a pedigree-based relationship matrix (A) (A-AM). After genomic selection was introduced into breeding programs, it was anticipated that VC estimates from A-AM would be biased because the effect of selection based on genomic information is not captured. The single-step method (H-AM), which uses an H matrix as (co)variance matrix, can be used as an alternative to estimate VC. Here, we compared VC estimates from A-AM and H-AM and investigated the effect of genomic selection, genotyping strategy and genotyping proportion on the estimation of VC from the two methods, by analyzing a dataset from a commercial broiler line and a simulated dataset that mimicked the broiler population.

Results

VC estimates from H-AM were severely overestimated with a high proportion of selective genotyping, and overestimation increased as proportion of genotyping increased in the analysis of both commercial and simulated data. This bias in H-AM estimates arises when selective genotyping is used to construct the H-matrix, regardless of whether selective genotyping is applied or not in the selection process. For simulated populations under genomic selection, estimates of genetic variance from A-AM were also significantly overestimated when the effect of genomic selection was strong. Our results suggest that VC estimates from H-AM under random genotyping have the expected values. Predicted breeding values from H-AM were inflated when VC estimates were biased, and inflation differed between genotyped and ungenotyped animals, which can lead to suboptimal selection decisions.

Conclusions

We conclude that VC estimates from H-AM are biased with selective genotyping, but are close to expected values with random genotyping.VC estimates from A-AM in populations under genomic selection are also biased but to a much lesser degree. Therefore, we recommend the use of H-AM with random genotyping to estimate VC for populations under genomic selection. Our results indicate that it is still possible to use selective genotyping in selection, but then VC estimation should avoid the use of genotypes from one side only of the distribution of phenotypes. Hence, a dual genotyping strategy may be needed to address both selection and VC estimation.

SUBMITTER: Wang L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7291515 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.

Wang Lei L Janss Luc L LL Madsen Per P Henshall John J Huang Chyong-Huoy CH Marois Danye D Alemu Setegn S Sørensen A C AC Jensen Just J

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE 20200611 1

<h4>Background</h4>The traditional way to estimate variance components (VC) is based on the animal model using a pedigree-based relationship matrix (A) (A-AM). After genomic selection was introduced into breeding programs, it was anticipated that VC estimates from A-AM would be biased because the effect of selection based on genomic information is not captured. The single-step method (H-AM), which uses an H matrix as (co)variance matrix, can be used as an alternative to estimate VC. Here, we com ...[more]

PMID: 32527317

Similar Datasets

Project description:Variance and covariance components of growth and production traits were analyzed employing REML animal model to assess the Dahlem Red (PD-3) chicken population for direct additive genetic, maternal effects and to estimate the estimated breeding value (EBV), genetic parameters, genetic trends and rate of inbreeding (ΔF) utilizing seven generation's data. The generation and hatch had significant (P≤0.01) effect on the body weight at 0 day (BW0), 2 (BW2), 4 (BW4) and 6 weeks (BW6) and shank length at six weeks of age (SL6). The average least squares means (LSM) for BW6 and SL6 were 273.93±0.62 g and 53.97±0.05 mm, respectively. All the production traits were significantly (P≤0.01) influenced by generation and hatch. The average LSM for age at sexual maturity (ASM), egg production up to 40 weeks (EP40) and egg mass up to 40 weeks (EM40) were 168.82±0.25 d, 72.60±0.41 eggs and 4.21±0.07 kg, respectively. Model 5 with additive direct, maternal genetic, maternal permanent environmental and residual variance components was the best for BW0, BW2 and BW4 based on the AIC values obtained in WOMBAT. Model 4 was the best model for BW6, SL6, ASM, EP40 and EM40 with additive direct, maternal permanent environmental and residual variance components. Maternal effects were higher during early age, decreased with age, and remained present until 20 weeks of age. The heritability (h2) estimates were low to moderate in magnitude for all the growth traits and ranged from 0.02±0.03 to 0.19±0.03. The maternal heritability was high at hatch (0.35±0.06), decreased gradually until 4th week (0.02±0.01) and ceased afterwards. The heritabilities of EP40 (0.11±0.03) and EM40 (0.12±0.04) were low. The direct additive genetic correlations (ra) between BW2, BW4, BW6 and SL6 were high and positive (P≤ 0.05). The additive genetic and maternal permanent environmental correlation between EP40 and EM40 were high and positive (P≤ 0.05). The EBV of EM40 was significant (P≤ 0.05) with 0.48 kg/generation in PD-3 chicken at the end of the seventh generation. The EBV of EP40 showed an increasing trend with a genetic gain of 1.87 eggs per generation. The average inbreeding coefficient of the population was 0.019 and average ΔF was 0.007 over the last seven generations of selection. The EBV trends for primary and associated traits showed linear trends in the desired direction and negligible inbreeding.

Project description:Selective genotyping of crossbred (CB) animals to include in traditionally purebred (PB) dominated genetic evaluations has been shown to provide an increase in the response to selection for CB performance. However, the inclusion of phenotypes from selectively genotyped CB animals, without the phenotypes of their non-genotyped cohorts, could cause bias in estimated variance components (VC) and subsequent estimated breeding values (EBV). The objective of the study was to determine the impact of selective CB genotyping on VC estimates and subsequent bias in EBV when non-genotyped CB animals are not included in genetic evaluations. A swine crossbreeding scheme producing 3-way CB animals was simulated to create selectively genotyped datasets. The breeding scheme consisted of three PB breeds each with 25 males and 450 females, F1 crosses with 1200 females and 12,000 CB progeny. Eighteen chromosomes each with 100 QTL and 4k SNP markers were simulated. Both PB and CB performances were considered to be moderately heritable (h2 = 0.4). Factors evaluated were as follows: 1) CB phenotype and genotype inclusion of 15% (n = 1800) or 35% (n = 4200), 2) genetic correlation between PB and CB performance (rpc = 0.1, 0.5, or 0.7), and 3) selective genotyping strategy. Genotyping strategies included the following: 1) Random: random CB selection, 2) Top: highest CB phenotype, and 3) Extreme: half highest and half lowest CB phenotypes. Top and Extreme selective genotyping strategies were considered by selecting animals in full-sib (FS) families or among the CB population (T). In each generation, 4320 PB selection candidates contributed phenotypic and genotypic records. Each scenario was replicated 15 times. VC were estimated for PB and CB performance utilizing bivariate models using pedigree relationships with dams of CB animals considered to be unknown. Estimated values of VC for PB performance were not statistically different from true values. Top selective genotyping strategies produced deflated estimates of phenotypic VC for CB performance compared to true values. When using estimated VC, Top_T and Extreme_T produced the most biased EBV, yet EBV of PB selection candidates for CB performance were most accurate when using Extreme_T. Results suggest that randomly selecting CB animals to genotype or selectively genotyping Top or Extreme CB animals within full-sib families can lead to accurate estimates of additive genetic VC for CB performance and unbiased EBV.

Dataset Information

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.

Background

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets