Dataset Information

Infection rate and clinical management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital in northern Italy.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Optimal management of patients with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic is still pending. METHODS:Our patients were advised to maintain their scheduled appointments, and planned cancer treatment was continued without unnecessary delays in an outpatient setting. Additional strict preventive infection measures were rapidly implemented at our outpatient department. When COVID-19 test became widely available, universal testing of healthcare workers and vigorous screening of all patients coming to our facility for COVID-19 infection were performed by SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription PCR on rhinopharyngeal swab. RESULTS:As of the data cut-off on 9 April 2020, a total of 156 oncology patients with a median age of 67 (range 26-86) years and 63 haematology patients (median age 69 years, range 23-89) were screened for COVID-19 during active cancer treatment. Prevalence (1.8%; 4/219) of COVID-19 in patients with cancer was significantly higher compared with a respective control group of asymptomatic counterparts (p=0.018). Outcomes of COVID-19 positive patients were good, with only one observed death due to progression of advanced metastatic disease. CONCLUSION:Our data indicate that continuation of anticancer treatment in epidemic areas during the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be safe and feasible, if adequate and strict preventive measures are vigorously and successfully carried out.

SUBMITTER: Fong D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7292048 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Infection rate and clinical management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital in northern Italy.

Fong Dominic D Rauch Simon S Petter Christian C Haspinger Eva E Alber Monika M Mitterer Manfred M

ESMO open 20200601 3

<h4>Background</h4>Optimal management of patients with cancer during COVID-19 pandemic is still pending.<h4>Methods</h4>Our patients were advised to maintain their scheduled appointments, and planned cancer treatment was continued without unnecessary delays in an outpatient setting. Additional strict preventive infection measures were rapidly implemented at our outpatient department. When COVID-19 test became widely available, universal testing of healthcare workers and vigorous screening of all ...[more]

PMID: 32527730

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children is characterized by a wide variety of expressions ranging from asymptomatic to, rarely, critical illness. The basis of this variability is not yet fully understood. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and genetic risk factors predisposing to disease susceptibility and progression in children.MethodsWe enrolled 181 consecutive children aged less than 18 years hospitalized with or for SARS-CoV-2 infection during a period of 24 months. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and microbiological data were collected. The development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related complications and their specific therapies were assessed. In a subset of 79 children, a genetic analysis was carried out to evaluate the role of common COVID-19 genetic risk factors (chromosome 3 cluster; ABO-blood group system; FUT2, IFNAR2, OAS1/2/3, and DPP9 loci).ResultsThe mean age of hospitalized children was 5.7 years, 30.9% of them being under 1 year of age. The majority of children (63%) were hospitalized for reasons different than COVID-19 and incidentally tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, while 37% were admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chronic underlying diseases were reported in 29.8% of children. The majority of children were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic; only 12.7% developed a moderate to critical disease. A concomitant pathogen, mainly respiratory viruses, was isolated in 53.3%. Complications were reported in 7% of children admitted for other reasons and in 28.3% of those hospitalized for COVID-19. The respiratory system was most frequently involved, and the C-reactive protein was the laboratory test most related to the development of critical clinical complications. The main risk factors for complication development were prematurity [relative risk (RR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-6.1], comorbidities (RR 4.5, 95% CI 3.3-5.6), and the presence of coinfections (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.75). The OAS1/2/3 risk variant was the main genetic risk factor for pneumonia development [Odds ratio (OR) 3.28, 95% CI 1-10.7; p value 0.049].ConclusionOur study confirmed that COVID-19 is generally less severe in children, although complications can develop, especially in those with comorbidities (chronic diseases or prematurity) and coinfections. Variation at the OAS1/2/3 genes cluster is the main genetic risk factor predisposing to COVID-19 pneumonia in children.

Project description:PurposeBevacizumab (BEV) has been used for ovarian cancer (OC) for years in Taiwan, but the associated data related to outcome is scant. This retrospective study reviewed patients with OC treated with BEV and analyzed their results.Patients and methodsAll patients with OC treated with BEV from 2009 to 2015 in the Linkou branch of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Northern Taiwan were included. According to the means of administration, the patients were classified into 6 groups as follows: A-BEV plus chemotherapy (C/T) for initial platinum-resistant (PR) recurrent OC, B-BEV plus C/T for initial platinum-sensitive (PS) recurrent OC, C-BEV alone for recurrent OC, D-BEV plus 1st adjuvant C/T, E-BEV plus neoadjuvant C/T, and F-intraperitoneal (IP) BEV. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), hazard ratios (HRs), overall response rate (ORR), and mean number of BEV cycles were analyzed for groups A to E. Clinical improvement of ascites was assessed for group F.ResultsA comparison of early use (only one round of prior C/T) versus late use (multiple rounds of prior C/T) in patients of groups A and B showed a superior PFS (8.27 vs. 3.67, p = 0.037) in the early use group. No significant differences were found between groups A and B (PFS: 4.24 vs. 4.17 months, p = 0.690; OS: 10.06 vs. 9.93 months, p = 0.819; mean BEV cycles: 4.63 vs. 5.0 p = 0.992; ORR: 48.1% vs. 53.5%, p = 0.425). Comparing the response and non-response subgroups of patients in groups A and B, a better outcome was associated with endometrioid type cell (HR = 0.28, p = 0.008), good ECOG performance status (HR = 0.51, p = 0.005), and lack of ascites (HR = 0.67, p = 0.004). Comparing group C with groups A plus B, the BEV alone group had a poorer PFS (1.02 VS. 4.19, p = 0.04) and OS (1.42 VS. 9.99 p = 0.001) than the BEV plus C/T group. In group F, a good clinical benefit rate (85.6%) of ascites improvement was noted. Two patients had grade 5 gastrointestinal bleeding and venous/arterial thromboembolic events after administration of BEV. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in our study.ConclusionEarly use of BEV combined with chemotherapy had a significant benefit in PFS for patients with recurrent OC. BEV plus chemotherapy was better than BEV alone for recurrent OC. In addition, IP BEV was helpful for improving clinical ascites.

Project description:BackgroundFew data are available about temporal trends of antibiotic use in hospitalized children. The aim of the current study was to investigate the pattern and trends of antibiotic use over the years 2008-2016 in the largest children's hospital in Italy.MethodsAnnual point prevalence surveys of antibiotic use were conducted by reviewing medical charts of 0-17 year-old children hospitalized for ≥48 h. Prevalence of antibiotic use was computed by year, type of ward and indication. Trends in prevalence over time were evaluated using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Possibile determinants of antibiotic use were assessed at univariate analysis and through a logistic regression model.ResultsOut of 3015 children, 1516 (50.3%) received antibiotics, 58.1% of which for medical/surgical prophylaxis. Prevalence of antibiotic use increased from 42.0% in 2008 to 56.2% in 2016 (p = 0.001). The prevalence of patients receiving antibiotics for medical prophylaxis increased from 6.1% in 2008 to 24.2% in 2016 (p < 0.001), whereas the prevalence of patients receiving antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis significantly decreased (from 13.7 to 11.8%; p = 0.04); no significant temporal trends were found in antibiotic use for treating infections. The administration of third-generation cephalosporins for surgical and medical prophylaxis significantly decreased over time, while the proportion of antibiotics prescribed to treat infections after microbiological investigations significantly increased. Year (ORadj: 1.8 in 2016 compared to 2008, p < 0.001), age (ORadj ≥1.5 in children ≥1 year, compared to infants ≤2 months, p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) (ORadj: 1.4 in case of LOS between 8 and 30 days compared to LOS ≤ 7 days, p < 0.001), and type of ward (ORadj: ≥1.3 in intensive-care, surgical and medical-subspecialty units compared to medical units, p < 0.001) were significantly and independently associated with antibiotic use.ConclusionsComparing prevalence rates of antibiotic use among hospitals and over time should consider differences in patient characteristics, such as age, ward of hospitalization and length of stay. Over the years, we documented an improvement in the choice of antibiotics prescribed for medical and surgical prophylaxis. However, further efforts are needed to avoid antibiotic misuse for medical prophylaxis, and to reduce the empirical use of broad spectrum antibiotics.

Dataset Information

Infection rate and clinical management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital in northern Italy.

Publications

Infection rate and clinical management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital in northern Italy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets