Dataset Information

Diabetes management at community health centers: Examining associations with patient and regional characteristics, efficiency, and staffing patterns.

ABSTRACT: A major source of primary health care for millions of Americans, community health centers (CHCs) act as a key point of access for diabetes care. The ability of a CHC to deliver high quality care, that supports patients' management of their diabetes, may be impacted by the unique set of resources and constraints it faces, both in terms of characteristics of its patient population and aspects of operations. This study examines how patient and regional characteristics, staffing patterns, and efficiency were associated with diabetes management at CHCs (percentage of patients with uncontrolled diabetes, HbA1C > 9%). Data on a sample of 1229 CHCs came from multiple sources. CHC-level information was obtained from the Uniform Data System and regional-level information from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and the US Census American Community Survey. A clustering methodology, latent class analysis, identified seven underlying staffing patterns at CHCs. Data envelopment analysis was performed to evaluate the efficiency of CHCs, relative to centers with similar staffing patterns. Finally, generalized linear models were used to examine the association between staffing patterns, efficiency, and patient and regional-level characteristics. Findings from this study have sociological, practical, and methodological implications. Findings highlight that the intersection of patient racial composition with regional racial composition is significant; diabetes control appears to be worse at CHCs serving racial minorities living in predominantly White areas. Findings suggest that CHCs that incorporate more behavioral health care into their staffing mix have lower rates of uncontrolled diabetes among their patients. Finally, greater efficiency in CHC operations is associated with better diabetes control among patients. By identifying sociodemographic and operational characteristics associated with better hemoglobin control among diabetes patients, the current study contributes to our understanding of both health care operations and health inequalities.

SUBMITTER: Thorsen M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7295229 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHealth information exchange (HIE) is an important tool for improving efficiency and quality and is required for providers to meet Meaningful Use certification from the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. However widespread adoption and use of HIE has been difficult to achieve, especially in settings such as smaller-sized physician practices and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We assess electronic data exchange activities and identify barriers and benefits to HIE participation in two underserved settings.MethodsWe conducted key-informant interviews with stakeholders at physician practices and health centers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then coded in two waves: first using an open-coding approach and second using selective coding to identify themes that emerged across interviews, including barriers and facilitators to HIE adoption and use.ResultsWe interviewed 24 providers, administrators and office staff from 16 locations in two states. They identified barriers to HIE use at three levels-regional (e.g., lack of area-level exchanges; partner organizations), inter-organizational (e.g., strong relationships with exchange partners; achieving a critical mass of users), and intra-organizational (e.g., type of electronic medical record used; integration into organization's workflow). A major perceived benefit of HIE use was the improved care-coordination clinicians could provide to patients as a direct result of the HIE information. Utilization and perceived benefit of the exchange systems differed based on several practice- and clinic-level factors.ConclusionsThe adoption and use of HIE in underserved settings appears to be impeded by regional, inter-organizational, and intra-organizational factors and facilitated by perceived benefits largely at the intra-organizational level. Stakeholders should consider factors both internal and external to their organization, focusing efforts in changing modifiable factors and tailoring HIE efforts based on all three categories of factors. Collective action between organizations may be needed to address inter-organizational and regional barriers. In the interest of facilitating HIE adoption and use, the impact of interventions at various levels on improving the use of electronic health data exchange should be tested.

Dataset Information

Diabetes management at community health centers: Examining associations with patient and regional characteristics, efficiency, and staffing patterns.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets