Dataset Information

Efficacy of Thiamine in the Treatment of Postcardiac Arrest Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Thiamine administration has been shown to improve survival in a postcardiac arrest animal study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of thiamine in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients following return of spontaneous circulation.

Methods

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Thirty-seven OHCA patients were randomly assigned to receive either thiamine 100?mg every 8 hours or a placebo. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.

Results

Over the course of 2 years, 37 patients were randomized to either receive thiamine (n?=?20) or a placebo (n?=?17). The primary outcome was not different between the groups: 10/20 (50%) in the thiamine group vs. 8/17 (47.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.93 by the log-rank test). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the groups (good neurological outcome, lactate level, and S100B level).

Conclusions

In this study, there were no significant differences in survival outcome. Further studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these results.

SUBMITTER: Pradita-Ukrit S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7298263 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of Thiamine in the Treatment of Postcardiac Arrest Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Pradita-Ukrit Suntornwit S Vattanavanit Veerapong V

Critical care research and practice 20200608

<h4>Background</h4>Thiamine administration has been shown to improve survival in a postcardiac arrest animal study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of thiamine in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients following return of spontaneous circulation.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Thirty-seven OHCA patients were randomly assigned to receive either thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours or a placebo. The primary outcome was 28-day all-ca ...[more]

PMID: 32587766

Similar Datasets

Project description:End-of-life care and decisions on withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies vary across countries, which may affect the feasibility of future multicenter cardiac arrest trials. In Brazil, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy is reportedly uncommon, allowing the natural history of postcardiac arrest hypoxic-ischemic brain injury to present itself. We aimed to characterize approaches to neuroprognostication of cardiac arrest survivors among physicians in Brazil.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingBetween August 2, 2019, and July 31, 2020, we distributed a web-based survey to physicians practicing in Brazil.SubjectsPhysicians practicing in Brazil and members of the Brazilian Association of Neurointensive Care, who care for patients resuscitated following cardiac arrest.InterventionsNot applicable.Measurements and main resultsResponses from 185 physicians were obtained. Pupillary reflexes, corneal reflexes, and motor responses were considered critical to prognostication, whereas neuroimaging and electroencephalography were also regarded as important. For patients without targeted temperature management, absent pupillary and corneal reflexes at 24 hours postarrest were considered strongly predictive of poor neurologic outcome by 31.8% and 33.0%, respectively. For targeted temperature management-treated patients, absent pupillary and corneal reflexes at 24-hour postrewarming were considered prognostic by 22.9% and 20.0%, respectively. Physicians felt comfortable making definitive prognostic recommendations at day 6 postarrest or later (34.2%) for nontargeted temperature management-treated patients, and at day 6 postrewarming (20.4%) for targeted temperature management-treated patients. Over 90% believed that improving neuroprognostic accuracy would affect end-of-life decision-making.ConclusionsThere is significant variability in neuroprognostic approaches to postcardiac arrest patients and timing of prognostic studies among Brazilian physicians, with practices frequently deviating from current guidelines, underscoring a need for greater neuroprognostic accuracy. Nearly all physicians believed that improving neuroprognostication will impact end-of-life decision-making. Given the tendency to delay prognostic recommendations while using similar neuroprognostic tools, Brazil offers a unique cohort in which to examine the natural history of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in future studies.

Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this pilot study was to determine if a definitive clinical trial of thiamine supplementation was warranted in patients with acute heart failure. We hypothesized that thiamine, when added to standard of care, would improve dyspnea (primary outcome) in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure. Peak expiratory flow rate, type B natriuretic peptide, free fatty acids, glucose, hospital length of stay, as well as 30-day rehospitalization and mortality were pre-planned secondary outcome measures.MethodsThis was a blinded experimental study at two urban academic hospitals. Consecutive patients admitted from the Emergency Department with a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure were recruited over 2 years. Patients on a daily dietary supplement were excluded. Randomization was stratified by type B natriuretic peptide and diabetes medication categories. Subjects received study drug (100 mg thiamine or placebo) in the evening of their first and second day. Outcome measures were obtained 8 h after study drug infusion. Dyspnea was measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale sitting up on oxygen, sitting up off oxygen, and lying supine off oxygen with 0 indicating no dyspnea. Data were analyzed using mixed-models as well as linear, negative binomial and logistic regression models to assess the impact of group on outcome measures.ResultsOf 130 subjects randomized, 118 had evaluable data (55 in the control and 63 in the treatment groups), 89% in both groups were adjudicated to have primarily AHF. Thiamine values increased significantly in the treatment group and were unchanged in the control group. One patient had thiamine deficiency. Only dyspnea measured sitting upright on oxygen differed significantly by group over time. No change was found for the other measures of dyspnea and all of the secondary measures.ConclusionsIn mild-moderate acute heart failure patients without thiamine deficiency, a standard dosing regimen of thiamine did not improve dyspnea, biomarkers, or other clinical parameters.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00680706 , May 20, 2008 (retrospectively registered).

Dataset Information

Efficacy of Thiamine in the Treatment of Postcardiac Arrest Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Efficacy of Thiamine in the Treatment of Postcardiac Arrest Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets