Dataset Information

Predictive performance of the mHAP-II score in a real-life western cohort with hepatocellular carcinoma following trans-arterial chemoembolisation with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE).

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the predictive performance of the modified hepatoma arterial embolisation prognostic II (mHAP-II) score in a real-life western hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cohort treated with drug-eluting bead-TACE and compare the mHAP-II with other scores in this cohort. METHODS:One hundred seventy-nine HCC patients (mean age 77 (±?9) years, 87% male) with one or more drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE sessions using 100-300 ?m microspheres were retrospectively analysed. Performance analysis of the mHAP-II score was based on Mann-Whitney U tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, receiver operating characteristics, Akaike's information criterion and Cox regression models. RESULTS:In this population, HCC risk factors were mainly alcohol abuse (31%) and hepatitis C (28%). The median survival of the entire cohort was 29.4 months. mHAP-II classification of the cohort was mHAP-II B (30%), C (41%) and D (23%) respectively. Survival of all subgroups differed significantly from each other (each p??400 ?g/l (HR 1.14), serum albumin ?0.9 mg/dl (HR 1.58) contributed significantly in Cox proportional hazards regression (each p?

SUBMITTER: Peisen F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7305077 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predictive performance of the mHAP-II score in a real-life western cohort with hepatocellular carcinoma following trans-arterial chemoembolisation with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE).

Peisen Felix F Maurer Michael M Grosse Ulrich U Nikolaou Konstantin K Syha Roland R Ketelsen Dominik D Artzner Christoph C Bitzer Michael M Horger Marius M Grözinger Gerd G

European radiology 20200303 7

<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the predictive performance of the modified hepatoma arterial embolisation prognostic II (mHAP-II) score in a real-life western hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cohort treated with drug-eluting bead-TACE and compare the mHAP-II with other scores in this cohort.<h4>Methods</h4>One hundred seventy-nine HCC patients (mean age 77 (± 9) years, 87% male) with one or more drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE sessions using 100-300 μm microspheres were retrospectively analysed. Perfo ...[more]

PMID: 32125515

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo compare efficacy, survival outcome and prognostic factors of conventional transarterial chemoembolisation (cTACE), drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) and yttrium-90 radioembolisation (Y90) for the treatment of liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumours (NELM).MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 192 patients (58.6 years mean age, 56% men) with NELM treated with cTACE (N = 122), DEB-TACE (N = 26) or Y90 (N = 44) between 2000 and 2014. Radiologic response to therapy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using periprocedural MR imaging. Survival analysis included propensity score analysis (PSA), median overall survival (MOS), hepatic progression-free survival, Kaplan-Meier using log-rank test and the uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (MVA).ResultsMOS of the entire study population was 28.8 months. As for cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90, MOS was 33.8 months, 21.7 months and 23.6 months, respectively. According to the MVA, cTACE demonstrated a significantly longer MOS as compared to DEB-TACE (p <.01) or Y90 (p = .02). The 5-year survival rate after initial cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 was 28.2%, 10.3% and 18.5%, respectively.ConclusionsUpon PSA, our study suggests significant survival benefits for patients treated with cTACE as compared to DEB-TACE and Y90. This data supports the therapeutic decision for cTACE as the primary intra-arterial therapy option in patients with unresectable NELM until proven otherwise.Key points• cTACE achieved a significantly longer overall survival in patients with unresectable NELM. • Patients treated with cTACE showed a prolonged hepatic progression-free survival. • cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 radioembolisation demonstrated comparable safety and toxicity profiles. • Age >70 years, extrahepatic metastases and tumour burden >50% were identified as negative predictors. • Propensity score analysis suggests the superiority of cTACE over DEB-TACE and Y90.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) using lipiodol-based regimens in HCC patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with patent TIPS who underwent TACE from January 2013 to January 2019 that received either DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group, n = 57) or cTACE (cTACE group, n = 62). The complications, liver toxicity, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the groups.ResultsAltogether, 119 patients (50 ± 11 years, 107 men) were evaluated. The incidence of adverse events, including abdominal pain within 7 days (45.6% vs 79.0%, p < 0.001) and hepatic failure within 30 days (5.3% vs 19.4%, p = 0.027), were significantly lower in the DEB-TACE group than in the cTACE group. Compared to the cTACE group, the DEB-TACE group also showed mild liver toxicities in terms of increased total bilirubin (8.8% vs 22.6%), alanine aminotransferase (5.3% vs 21.0%), and aspartate aminotransferase (10.5% vs 29.0%) levels. The DEB-TACE group had better ORR than the cTACE group (70.2% vs 50.0%). The median OS and TTP were longer in the DEB-TACE group (11.4 vs 9.1 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.46, p < 0.001; 6.9 vs 5.2 months, HR = 1.47, p = 0.045). Multivariable analysis showed that α-fetoprotein levels, Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage, and treatment allocation were independent predictors of OS.ConclusionDEB-TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients with a TIPS and is potentially superior to cTACE in terms of complications, liver toxicities, OS, TTP, and ORR.Key points• DEB-TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients after a TIPS procedure. • DEB-TACE improves overall survival, objective response rate, and liver toxicities and is non-inferior to cTACE in terms of time to progression. • DEB-TACE might be a potential new therapeutic option for HCC patients with TIPS.

Project description:ObjectivesTo retrospectively compare long-term outcomes of first-line drug-eluting particle (DEB)- transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lipiodol-TACE, in patients with unresectable hepatocellular (HCC).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed our database to identify adult patients with treatment-naïve unresectable HCC, who underwent TACE from 2006 to 2013. Patients were excluded in the absence of complete medical records relative to first TACE, 1-month follow-up, and/or sufficient follow-up data. Periprocedural complications, duration of hospitalization, 1-month tumor response by mRECIST, time to tumor progression (TTP) and target tumor progression (TTTP), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.ResultsOut of an initial series of 656 patients, 329 patients were excluded for unavailability of sufficient baseline and/or follow-up data. The remaining 327 patients underwent either lipiodol-TACE (n = 160) or DEB-TACE (n = 167). Patients treated with lipiodol-TACE had a significantly higher tumor burden. By propensity score, patients were matched according to baseline differences (BCLC stage, uninodular or multinodular HCC, and unilobar or bilobar HCC), resulting in 101 patients in each treatment group. Lipiodol-TACE was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events (p = 0.03), and longer hospitalization (mean, 2.5 days vs 1.9 days; p = 0.03), while tumor response, TTP, and OS were comparable. In patients achieving 1-month complete response (CR) of target tumor, TTTP was significantly (p = 0.009) longer after DEB-TACE compared to lipiodol-TACE (median, 835 vs 353 days), resulting in a lower number of re-treatments during the entire follow-up (0.75 vs 1.6, p = 0.01).ConclusionCompared to lipiodol-TACE, DEB-TACE offers higher tolerability, reduced hospitalization, and more durable target tumor response after CR.Key points• Compared to lipiodol-TACE, DEB-TACE is better tolerated and has reduced side effects, which translates into shorter hospitalization. • When complete radiological response according to the mRECIST is obtained 1 month after the procedure, DEB-TACE offers a more durable local tumor control compared to lipiodol-TACE. • In these patients, the longer duration of response after DEB-TACE translates into a lower number of re-interventions.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are prone to developing refractoriness to standard treatment, and some patients are ineligible for systemic therapy owing to comorbidities or poor pulmonary function. The prognosis of patient with standard treatment-refractory/ineligible (STRI)-SCLC remains poor. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) for the treatment of SRTI-SCLC and to identify the predictors of overall survival (OS).MethodsA total of 18 patients with STRI-SCLC who received DEB-BACE were included. Treatment response, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were evaluated. Further molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy was administered as a second-line treatment or beyond for those patients who had not received these regimens previously. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to explore the predictors of OS for STRI-SCLC treated with DEB-BACE.ResultsThe overall disease control rate at 3 months after DEB-BACE was 77.8% (14/18); of these patients who experienced disease control, partial response and stable disease were achieved in 2 patients (11.1%) and 12 patients (66.7%), respectively. There were 7 patients (38.9%) who received anlotinib after DEB-BACE. No severe DEB-BACE-related or anlotinib-related adverse events were observed. The median PFS was 5.0 months; the 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 55.6% (10/18) and 11.1% (2/18), respectively. The median OS was 9.0 months; the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 77.8% (14/18) and 33.3% (6/18), respectively. Postoperative anlotinib [hazard ratio: 0.302; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.098-0.930; P=0.037] was identified as the predictor of OS in patients with STRI-SCLC treated with DEB-BACE.ConclusionsDEB-BACE is an effective and well-tolerated approach for patients with STRI-SCLC. Postoperative anlotinib is the predictor of OS and may indicate a better prognosis for patients with STRI-SCLC.

Dataset Information

Predictive performance of the mHAP-II score in a real-life western cohort with hepatocellular carcinoma following trans-arterial chemoembolisation with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE).

Publications

Predictive performance of the mHAP-II score in a real-life western cohort with hepatocellular carcinoma following trans-arterial chemoembolisation with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets