Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Development and preliminary verification of the evaluation system for clinical practice guidelines in China.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

Clinical practice guidelines can improve healthcare processes and patient outcomes; however, the quality of these guidelines varies greatly in China. The aim of this study was to construct a comprehensive instrument for the appraisal of clinical practice guidelines in China (AGREE-CHINA), and to validate its reliability as a tool for helping potential guideline users in assessing guideline quality.

Methods

First, an interdisciplinary working group was established for developing the methods. They also created a checklist as a tool according to the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) standards, considering the particularity of Chinese clinical practice. Next, the first draft of AGREE-China was developed by vote, modification, preliminary trial, and cross-verification. To ensure the objectivity, credibility, and reproducibility of the draft assessment, all of the checklists and standards were cross-reviewed fairly widely. Finally, AGREE-CHINA and AGREE II were used to assess the Chinese guidelines published in the past five years, and the results were compared.

Results

The presented AGREE-CHINA covered five main checkpoints (science and rigor, effectiveness and safety, economy, usability and feasibility, and conflicts of interest) with each point divided into several more specific checkpoints. Definitions and rationales for each main checkpoint appear in the Appendix. The quality ratings based on the total scores of AGREE-China and AGREE II were consistent (r = 0.508, P = 0.020). Compared with AGREE II, the study showed a higher level of interrater-reliability for AGREE-CHINA overall (ICC = 0.957, P < 0.001). The mean time required for AGREE-CHINA was less than that for AGREE II; this was approximately 30 minutes for every assessment. User satisfaction was generally high.

Conclusions

This paper has presented the first edition of the AGREE-CHINA appraisal tool for clinical guidelines. It is quick and easy to use; it assesses and performs well in comparison to AGREE II. This first version of AGREE-CHINA will require further development and validation.

SUBMITTER: Wang JY 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7305446 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Development and preliminary verification of the evaluation system for clinical practice guidelines in China.

Wang Ji-Yao JY   Wang Qiang Q   Wang Xiao-Qin XQ   Jin Xue-Juan XJ   Zhang Bo-Heng BH   Chen Shi-Yao SY   Gao Xue-Cheng XC  

Chronic diseases and translational medicine 20191017 2


<h4>Objective</h4>Clinical practice guidelines can improve healthcare processes and patient outcomes; however, the quality of these guidelines varies greatly in China. The aim of this study was to construct a comprehensive instrument for the appraisal of clinical practice guidelines in China (AGREE-CHINA), and to validate its reliability as a tool for helping potential guideline users in assessing guideline quality.<h4>Methods</h4>First, an interdisciplinary working group was established for dev  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5073383 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5918771 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5850908 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3548820 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9533168 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2846928 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6626266 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4689816 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6958518 | biostudies-literature