Dataset Information

Characterizing non-heroin opioid overdoses using electronic health records.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The opioid epidemic is a modern public health emergency. Common interventions to alleviate the opioid epidemic aim to discourage excessive prescription of opioids. However, these methods often take place over large municipal areas (state-level) and may fail to address the diversity that exists within each opioid case (individual-level). An intervention to combat the opioid epidemic that takes place at the individual-level would be preferable.

Methods

This research leverages computational tools and methods to characterize the opioid epidemic at the individual-level using the electronic health record data from a large, academic medical center. To better understand the characteristics of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) we leveraged a self-controlled analysis to compare the healthcare encounters before and after an individual's first overdose event recorded within the data. We further contrast these patients with matched, non-OUD controls to demonstrate the unique qualities of the OUD cohort.

Results

Our research confirms that the rate of opioid overdoses in our hospital significantly increased between 2006 and 2015 (P?pain or malignancy, which may suggest that overdose stems from pharmaceutical opioids prescribed for these conditions.

Conclusions

Informatics-based methodologies, like those presented here, may play a role in better understanding those individuals who suffer from opioid dependency and overdose, and may lead to future research and interventions that could successfully prevent morbidity and mortality associated with this epidemic.

SUBMITTER: Averitt AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7309230 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Characterizing non-heroin opioid overdoses using electronic health records.

Averitt Amelia J AJ Slovis Benjamin H BH Tariq Abdul A AA Vawdrey David K DK Perotte Adler J AJ

JAMIA open 20191126 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>The opioid epidemic is a modern public health emergency. Common interventions to alleviate the opioid epidemic aim to discourage excessive prescription of opioids. However, these methods often take place over large municipal areas (<i>state-level)</i> and may fail to address the diversity that exists within each opioid case (<i>individual-level</i>). An intervention to combat the opioid epidemic that takes place at the individual-level would be preferable.<h4>Methods</h4>Thi ...[more]

PMID: 32607490

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:To enhance automated methods for accurately identifying opioid-related overdoses and classifying types of overdose using electronic health record (EHR) databases. METHODS:We developed a natural language processing (NLP) software application to code clinical text documentation of overdose, including identification of intention for self-harm, substances involved, substance abuse, and error in medication usage. Using datasets balanced with cases of suspected overdose and records of individuals at elevated risk for overdose, we developed and validated the application using Kaiser Permanente Northwest data, then tested portability of the application using Kaiser Permanente Washington data. Datasets were chart-reviewed to provide a gold standard for comparison and evaluation of the automated method. RESULTS:The method performed well in identifying overdose (sensitivity = 0.80, specificity = 0.93), intentional overdose (sensitivity = 0.81, specificity = 0.98), and involvement of opioids (excluding heroin, sensitivity = 0.72, specificity = 0.96) and heroin (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 1.0). The method performed poorly at identifying adverse drug reactions and overdose due to patient error and fairly at identifying substance abuse in opioid-related unintentional overdose (sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.96). Evaluation using validation datasets yielded significant reductions, in specificity and negative predictive values only, for many classifications mentioned above. However, these measures remained above 0.80, thus, performance observed during development was largely maintained during validation. Similar results were obtained when evaluating portability, although there was a significant reduction in sensitivity for unintentional overdose that was attributed to missing text clinical notes in the database. CONCLUSIONS:Methods that process text clinical notes show promise for improving accuracy and fidelity at identifying and classifying overdoses according to type using EHR data.

Project description:PURPOSE:To facilitate surveillance and evaluate interventions addressing opioid-related overdoses, algorithms are needed for use in large health care databases to identify and differentiate community-occurring opioid-related overdoses from inpatient-occurring opioid-related overdose/oversedation. METHODS:Data were from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a large integrated health plan. We iteratively developed and evaluated an algorithm for electronically identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation in KPNW hospitals from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. Chart audits assessed accuracy; data sources included administrative and clinical records. RESULTS:The best-performing algorithm used these rules: (1) Include events with opioids administered in an inpatient setting (including emergency department/urgent care) followed by naloxone administration within 275 hours of continuous inpatient stay; (2) exclude events with electroconvulsive therapy procedure codes; and (3) exclude events in which an opioid was administered prior to hospital discharge and followed by readmission with subsequent naloxone administration. Using this algorithm, we identified 870 suspect inpatient overdose/oversedation events and chart audited a random sample of 235. Of the random sample, 185 (78.7%) were deemed overdoses/oversedation, 37 (15.5%) were not, and 13 (5.5%) were possible cases. The number of hours between time of opioid and naloxone administration did not affect algorithm accuracy. When "possible" overdoses/oversedations were included with confirmed events, overall positive predictive value (PPV) was very good (PPV = 84.0%). Additionally, PPV was reasonable when evaluated specifically for hospital stays with emergency/urgent care admissions (PPV = 77.0%) and excellent for elective surgery admissions (PPV = 97.0%). CONCLUSIONS:Algorithm performance was reasonable for identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation with best performance among elective surgery patients.

Dataset Information

Characterizing non-heroin opioid overdoses using electronic health records.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Characterizing non-heroin opioid overdoses using electronic health records.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure