Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation.


ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a 2010 community-based participatory research (CBPR) reporting guideline on the quality of reporting a CBPR on smoking cessation. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases and included articles published up to December 2019 (PROSPERO: CRD42019111668). We assessed reporting quality using the 13-item checklist. Of the 80 articles identified, 42 (53%) were published after 2010. The overall reporting quality before and after 2010 was poor and did not differ significantly (mean difference: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.21 to 1.53). The total reporting scores of the studies did not differ significantly according to the effect size of the intervention (beta coefficient: -2.86, 95% CI: -5.77 to 0.04). This study demonstrates the need to improve the quality of reporting CBPRs. We recommend that journal editors endorse the CBPR reporting guideline to encourage its use by more researchers.

SUBMITTER: Kato D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7312250 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation.

Kato Daisuke D   Kataoka Yuki Y   Suwangto Erfen Gustiawan EG   Kaneko Makoto M   Wakabayashi Hideki H   Son Daisuke D   Kawachi Ichiro I  

International journal of environmental research and public health 20200531 11


The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a 2010 community-based participatory research (CBPR) reporting guideline on the quality of reporting a CBPR on smoking cessation. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases and included articles published up to December 2019 (PROSPERO: CRD42019111668). We assessed reporting quality using the 13-item  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3149080 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7901040 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6527996 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7099931 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5701974 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2795163 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10134394 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8516386 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7610926 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7610696 | biostudies-literature