Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the size of the dots in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements.Methods
A stereopsis measurement system was created using a phoropter and two 4?K smartphones. Three dot sizes, including 1?×?1 pixel, 6?×?6 pixels, and 10?×?10 pixels (equivalent to 0.17?min arc, 1?min arc, and 1.68?min arc, respectively), were used to form random-dot arrays, and each test pattern had one Lea symbol hidden within it. The resulting stereograms were tested on 30 subjects with normal acuity and stereoacuity.Results
Stereoacuity measured with the 1-pixel dots was significantly worse than that measured with the 6-pixel dots (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Z?=?-4.903, P?ConclusionThe size of the dots in random-dot stereograms affects the test results significantly when the dots are too small for the eye to resolve.
SUBMITTER: Zhao L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7313195 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
BMC ophthalmology 20200624 1
<h4>Background</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the size of the dots in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements.<h4>Methods</h4>A stereopsis measurement system was created using a phoropter and two 4 K smartphones. Three dot sizes, including 1 × 1 pixel, 6 × 6 pixels, and 10 × 10 pixels (equivalent to 0.17 min arc, 1 min arc, and 1.68 min arc, respectively), were used to form random-dot arrays, and each test pattern had one Lea symbol hidden within it. Th ...[more]