Dataset Information

Peptidylarginine Deiminase Autoimmunity and the Development of Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Hapten-Carrier Model.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The presence of autoantibodies to citrullinated proteins (ACPAs) often precedes the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Citrullines are arginine residues that have been modified by peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs). PAD4 is the target of autoantibodies in RA. ACPAs could arise because PAD4 is recognized by T cells, which facilitate the production of autoantibodies to proteins bound by PAD4. We previously found evidence for this hapten-carrier model in mice. This study was undertaken to investigate whether there is evidence for this model in humans. METHODS:We analyzed antibody response to PAD4 and T cell proliferation in response to PAD4 in 41 RA patients and 36 controls. We tested binding of 65 PAD4 peptides to 5 HLA-DR alleles (DRB1*04:01, *04:02, *04:04, *01:01, and *07:01) and selected 11 PAD4 peptides for proliferation studies using samples from 22 RA patients and 27 controls. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from an additional 10 RA patients and 7 healthy controls were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD3, CD4, CD154, and tumor necrosis factor expression after PAD4 stimulation. RESULTS:Only patients with RA had both antibodies and T cell responses to PAD4. T cell response to peptide 8, a PAD4 peptide, was associated with RA (P = 0.02), anti-PAD4 antibodies (P = 0.057), and the shared epitope (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION:ACPA immunity is associated with antibodies to PAD4 and T cell responses to PAD4 and PAD4 peptides. These findings are consistent with a hapten-carrier model in which PAD4 is the carrier and citrullinated proteins are the haptens.

SUBMITTER: Auger I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7317357 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Peptidylarginine Deiminase Autoimmunity and the Development of Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Hapten-Carrier Model.

Auger Isabelle I Balandraud Nathalie N Massy Emmanuel E Hemon Marie F MF Peen Elisa E Arnoux Fanny F Mariot Charlotte C Martin Marielle M Lafforgue Pierre P Busnel Jean-Marc JM Roudier Jean J

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) 20200426 6

<h4>Objective</h4>The presence of autoantibodies to citrullinated proteins (ACPAs) often precedes the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Citrullines are arginine residues that have been modified by peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs). PAD4 is the target of autoantibodies in RA. ACPAs could arise because PAD4 is recognized by T cells, which facilitate the production of autoantibodies to proteins bound by PAD4. We previously found evidence for this hapten-carrier model in mice. This study wa ...[more]

PMID: 31820586

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGiven that autoantibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) are associated with erosive disease in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this study was conducted to compare the clinical and prognostic use of anti-PAD4 antibodies in patients with early and established RA.MethodsSera from patients with early (duration <2 years; n = 422) or established (duration ≥2 years; n = 359) RA from two randomized clinical trials of tofacitinib ± methotrexate compared with adalimumab + MTX or MTX alone were evaluated for the presence of anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD3/4 antibodies at baseline and posttreatment time points. Summary statistics were calculated for demographic, clinical, and serological characteristics, and generalized estimating equations were used to model clinical outcomes by disease duration according to anti-PAD4 status.ResultsAnti-PAD4 antibodies were present in 22% and 40% of patients with early and established RA, respectively, stable following treatment, and associated with baseline joint damage only in established RA. In early RA, baseline anti-PAD4 antibodies were associated with a greater improvement in disease activity score 28-joint count using C-reactive protein levels after treatment compared with individuals with negative anti-PAD4 (P = 0.049). Tofacitinib ± MTX was more broadly efficacious than MTX alone at improving clinical outcomes in early and established RA, irrespective of anti-PAD4 status (P < 0.05 for all), whereas adalimumab + MTX exhibited differential benefits in achieving disease activity score remission in early RA (P = 0.036) and American College of Rheumatology 20 responses in established RA (P = 0.002).ConclusionDifferences in prevalence, clinical associations, and treatment-response outcomes according to anti-PAD4 antibody status in early and established RA suggests the existence of a therapeutic window to prevent the accumulation of irreversible joint damage in early patients with RA with anti-PAD4 antibodies.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Because of its association with joint destruction, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered to be more severe than ACPA-negative RA. Clinically relevant joint destruction is now infrequent thanks to adequate disease suppression. According to patients, important outcomes are pain, fatigue, and independence. We evaluated whether ACPA-positive RA patients diagnosed during or after 2000 have more severe self-reported limitations and impairments, including restrictions at work, than ACPA-negative RA patients. METHODS:A total of 492 ACPA-positive and 450 ACPA-negative RA patients who fulfilled the 2010 criteria and were included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic cohort during or after 2000 were compared for self-reported pain, fatigue, disease activity, general well-being (measured by numerical rating scales), physical function (measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire), and work restrictions, including absenteeism at baseline and during the 4-year followup. Linear mixed models were used. RESULTS:At disease presentation, ACPA-negative patients had more severe pain, fatigue, self-reported disease activity scores, and functional disability (P < 0.05), although absolute differences were small. During followup, ACPA-negative patients remained somewhat more fatigued (P = 0.002), whereas other patient-reported impairments and limitations were similar. Thirty-eight percent of ACPA-negative and 48% of ACPA-positive patients reported absenteeism (P = 0.30), with median 4 days missed in both groups in the last 3 months. Also, restrictions at work among employed patients and restrictions with household work were not statistically different at baseline and during followup. CONCLUSION:In current rheumatology practice, ACPA-positive RA is not more severe than ACPA-negative RA in terms of patients' relevant outcomes, including physical functioning and restrictions at work. This implies that efforts to further improve the disease course should be proportional to both disease subsets.

Project description:The presence of anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) indicates a breach in immune tolerance. Recent studies indicate that this breach extends to homocitrullination of lysines with the formation of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies. We analyzed the clinical and serologic relationships of anti-CarP in 2 RA cohorts.Circulating levels of immunoglobulin G anti-CarP antibodies were determined by ELISA in established (Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center) and early (Sherbrooke University Hospital Center) cohorts and evaluated for anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), specific ACPA, and rheumatoid factor (RF) levels using the Student t test and correlation analysis.We identified elevated anti-CarP antibodies titers in 47.0% of seropositive patients (Dartmouth, n = 164), with relationships to anti-CCP (p < 0.0001) and IgM-RF (p = 0.001). Similarly, 38.2% of seropositive patients from the Sherbrooke cohort (n = 171) had elevated anti-CarP antibodies; titers correlated to anti-CCP (p = 0.01) but not IgM-RF (p = 0.09). A strong correlation with anti-Sa was observed: 47.9% anti-Sa+ patients were anti-CarP antibodies+ versus only 25.4% anti-Sa- in the Sherbrooke cohort (p = 0.0002), and 62.6% anti-Sa+ patients versus 26.9% anti-Sa- were anti-CarP antibodies+ in Dartmouth (p < 0.0001). We found a more variable response for reactivity to citrullinated fibrinogen or to citrullinated peptides from fibrinogen and ? enolase.In 2 North American RA cohorts, we observed a high prevalence of anti-CarP antibody positivity. We also describe a surprising and unexpected association of anti-CarP with anti-Sa antibodies that could not be explained by cross-reactivity. Further, considerable heterogeneity exists between anti-CarP reactivity and other citrullinated peptide reactivity, raising the question of how the pathogenesis of antibody responses for carbamylated proteins and citrullinated proteins may be linked in vivo.

Dataset Information

Peptidylarginine Deiminase Autoimmunity and the Development of Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Hapten-Carrier Model.

Publications

Peptidylarginine Deiminase Autoimmunity and the Development of Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Hapten-Carrier Model.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets