Dataset Information

Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Presently, educational programming is not standardized across radiation oncology (RO) training programs. Specifically, there are limited materials through national organizations or structured practice exams for residents preparing for the American Board of Radiology (ABR) oral board examination. We present our 2019 experience implementing a formalized program of early mock oral board examinations (MOBE) for residents in post-graduate years (PGY) 3-5.

Methods

A mixed-methods survey regarding MOBE perception and self-reported comfort across five clinical domains were administered to PGY2-5 residents. MOBEs and a post-intervention survey were implemented for the PGY3-5. The pre and post-intervention score across clinical domains were compared using t-tests. Faculty and residents were asked for post-intervention comments.

Results

A total of 14 PGY2-5 residents completed the pre-intervention survey; 9 residents participated in the MOBE (5/14 residents were PGY2s) and post-intervention survey. This was the first mock oral radiation oncology examination experience for 65% of residents. 100% of residents felt the MOBE increased their clinical knowledge and comfort with clinical reasoning. Overall, there was a trend towards improved resident confidence giving planning dose parameters and (p?=?0.08). There was also unanimous request for more MOBE experiences from residents and faculty, but time was identified as a significant barrier.

Conclusions

Future directions for this MOBE program are inclusion of more disease sites, better emulation of the exam, the creation of a more rigorous consolidated format testing all sites at once, and consideration for grading of these sessions for future correlation with certifying oral board examination (OBE) performance.

SUBMITTER: Peters GW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7318518 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology.

Peters Gabrielle W GW Decker Roy H RH Park Henry S HS Yu James B JB Evans Suzanne B SB

BMC medical education 20200626 1

<h4>Background</h4>Presently, educational programming is not standardized across radiation oncology (RO) training programs. Specifically, there are limited materials through national organizations or structured practice exams for residents preparing for the American Board of Radiology (ABR) oral board examination. We present our 2019 experience implementing a formalized program of early mock oral board examinations (MOBE) for residents in post-graduate years (PGY) 3-5.<h4>Methods</h4>A mixed-met ...[more]

PMID: 32586357

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeResidency training environments can differ significantly; therefore, resident satisfaction may vary widely among programs. Here, we sought to examine several variables in program satisfaction through a survey of radiation oncology (RO) trainees in the United States.Methods and materialsAn anonymous, institutional review board-approved, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to U.S. residents in RO in September 2016. This email-based survey assessed program-specific factors with regard to workload, work-life balance, and education as well as resident-specific factors such as marital status and postgraduate year. Binomial multivariable regression assessed the correlations between these factors and the endpoint of resident-reported likelihood of selecting an alternative RO residency program if given the choice again.ResultsA total of 215 residents completed the required survey sections, representing 29.3% of U.S. RO residents. When asked whether residency allowed for an adequate balance between work and personal life, the majority of residents (75.6%) agreed or strongly agreed, but a minority (9.3%) did not feel that residency allowed for sufficient time for personal life. The majority of residents (69.7%) indicated that they would choose the same residency program again, but 12.2% would have made a different choice. Almost three-fourths of residents (73.0%) felt that faculty and staff cared about the educational success of residents, but 9.27% did not. Binomial multivariable regression revealed that senior residents (odds ratio: 6.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.4) were more likely to desire a different residency program. In contrast, residents who reported constructive feedback use by the residency program (odds ratio:0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.91) were more satisfied with their program choice.ConclusionsMost RO residents reported satisfaction with their choice of residency program, but seniors had higher rates of dissatisfaction. Possible interventions to improve professional satisfaction include incorporating constructive resident feedback to enhance the program. The potential impact of job market pressures on seniors should be further explored.

Project description:PurposeAn effective didactic curriculum is a cornerstone for a successful residency program, as it is the basis upon which residents acquire the necessary knowledge and perspective to provide high-quality, evidence-based care. Here we describe our success in creating a standardized curriculum in clinical radiation oncology - one that was well-received and led to significantly improved performance on the national in-service examination.Methods and materialsOne-hundred and fifty topics were outlined in accordance with the American Board of Radiology; to accommodate this breadth of material, didactic frequency was increased from biweekly to daily. As a clinical correlate to these sessions, a teaching library of over 100 real-world cases was compiled for individual learning. Finally, comprehensive dosimetric constraints were compiled to aid residents in radiation therapy plan evaluation. To evaluate these curricular changes, anonymous questionnaires were provided to all residents and faculty, and de-identified resident clinical performance from the annual in-service examination was analyzed.ResultsBefore the introduction of the standardized curriculum, the mean clinical percentage on the in-service examination was 46%, equivalent to the 17th percentile. Within 2 years of implementation of the new curriculum, both the mean percentage and percentile were significantly improved, with the mean percentage correct at 69.3% and the mean percentile at the 59th percentile (P < .001 and P = .034, respectively). Feedback showed the curriculum to be well-received and used frequently outside of standard didactic hours.ConclusionsThis is the first report of the creation of a standardized curriculum and outcomes in radiation oncology. Although there are certainly developmental challenges, addressing these barriers creates an education model that effectively imparts knowledge, fosters multidisciplinary thinking, and prepares residents for the diverse challenges of clinical practice. We present our institutional experience with the intent of publishing this curriculum on a national platform in the coming years.

Dataset Information

Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets