Dataset Information

Mechanical tricuspid balloon 'valvuloplasty' in a prohibitive risk patient with cardiogenic shock: a case report.

ABSTRACT: Background:We present a complex case of a failing tricuspid mechanical valve prosthesis in a patient with refractory cardiogenic shock at prohibitive risk for surgery in whom balloon 'valvuloplasty' resulted in immediate haemodynamic improvement in valve function. Case summary:A 67-year-old woman with remote history of endocarditis s/p tricuspid valve repair and mechanical aortic valve replacement was referred for second opinion and management of new severe symptomatic tricuspid valve stenosis resulting in progressive debilitating congestive heart failure (HF). The patient was approved by the heart team to undergo redo open heart for surgical repair of the tricuspid valve. Intraoperative technical challenges were met to repair the tricuspid valve. In turn, the native valve was resected and a 33?mm On-X mechanical valve prosthesis. The patient's post-operative course was complicated by recurrent haemoptysis, prolonged mechanical respiratory support, acute kidney injury, and cardiogenic shock. Surgical re-exploration to address the dysfunctional mechanical tricuspid valve was felt to be prohibitive. Structural heart team was consulted. Cardiac catheterization was recommended to ascertain and confirm findings. The patient was transferred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Initial fluoroscopic examination of the heart confirmed the echocardiographic results of an immobile septal leaflet of the recently implanted mechanical tricuspid valve. An 8 × 40 mm Mustang OTW angioplasty balloon was then advanced across the mechanical valve and inflated gradually at nominal pressure. A single inflation resulted in successful restoration of valve leaflet function. Discussion:To the best of our knowledge, this is the first balloon 'valvuloplasty' on a mechanical On-X valve in the tricuspid position.

SUBMITTER: Hanna N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7319815 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Mechanical tricuspid balloon 'valvuloplasty' in a prohibitive risk patient with cardiogenic shock: a case report.

Hanna Nader N Carmona Andres A Crespo Hector H Cubeddu Roberto J RJ

European heart journal. Case reports 20200503 3

<h4>Background</h4>We present a complex case of a failing tricuspid mechanical valve prosthesis in a patient with refractory cardiogenic shock at prohibitive risk for surgery in whom balloon 'valvuloplasty' resulted in immediate haemodynamic improvement in valve function.<h4>Case summary</h4>A 67-year-old woman with remote history of endocarditis s/p tricuspid valve repair and mechanical aortic valve replacement was referred for second opinion and management of new severe symptomatic tricuspid v ...[more]

PMID: 32617470

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of critical end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac disorder. For people with refractory CS despite maximal vasopressors, inotropic support and intra-aortic balloon pump, mortality approaches 100%. Mechanical assist devices provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) which has the ability to maintain vital organ perfusion, to unload the failing ventricle thus reduce intracardiac filling pressures which reduces pulmonary congestion, myocardial wall stress and myocardial oxygen consumption. This has been hypothesised to allow time for myocardial recovery (bridge to recovery) or allow time to come to a decision as to whether the person is a candidate for a longer-term ventricular assist device (VAD) either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a destination therapy with a long-term VAD.ObjectivesTo assess whether mechanical assist devices improve survival in people with acute cardiogenic shock.Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and Web of Science Core Collection in November 2019. In addition, we searched three trials registers in August 2019. We scanned reference lists and contacted experts in the field to obtain further information. There were no language restrictions.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials on people with acute CS comparing mechanical assist devices with best current intensive care management, including intra-aortic balloon pump and inotropic support.Data collection and analysisWe performed data collection and analysis according to the published protocol. Primary outcomes were survival to discharge, 30 days, 1 year and secondary outcomes included, quality of life, major adverse cardiovascular events (30 days/end of follow-up), dialysis-dependent (30 days/end of follow-up), length of hospital stay and length of intensive care unit stay and major adverse events. We used the five GRADE considerations (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) to assess the quality of a body of evidence as it relates to the studies which contribute data to the meta-analyses for the prespecified outcomes Summary statistics for the primary endpoints were risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Main resultsThe search identified five studies from 4534 original citations reviewed. Two studies included acute CS of all causes randomised to treatment using TandemHeart percutaneous VAD and three studies included people with CS secondary to acute myocardial infarction who were randomised to Impella CP or best medical management. Meta-analysis was performed only to assess the 30-day survival as there were insufficient data to perform any further meta-analyses. The results from the five studies with 162 participants showed mechanical assist devices may have little or no effect on 30-day survival (RR of 1.01 95% CI 0.76 to 1.35) but the evidence is very uncertain. Complications such as sepsis, thromboembolic phenomena, bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events were not infrequent in both the MAD and control group across the studies, but these could not be pooled due to inconsistencies in adverse event definitions and reporting. We identified four randomised control trials assessing mechanical assist devices in acute CS that are currently ongoing.Authors' conclusionsThere is no evidence from this review of a benefit from MCS in improving survival for people with acute CS. Further use of the technology, risk stratification and optimising the use protocols have been highlighted as potential reasons for lack of benefit and are being addressed in the current ongoing clinical trials.

Dataset Information

Mechanical tricuspid balloon 'valvuloplasty' in a prohibitive risk patient with cardiogenic shock: a case report.

Publications

Mechanical tricuspid balloon 'valvuloplasty' in a prohibitive risk patient with cardiogenic shock: a case report.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets