Dataset Information

Survival after delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A national registry study.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Survival after delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DR-CPR) is not well characterized in full-term infants, and survival outcomes after DR-CPR have not been defined across the spectrum of gestation. The study objectives were to define gestational age (GA) specific survival following DR-CPR and to assess the association between GA and DR-CPR characteristics and survival outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Newborn infants without congenital abnormalities who received greater than 1 min of chest compressions for DR-CPR were included. GA was stratified by categorical subgroups: ≥36 weeks; 33-35^6/7 weeks; 29-32^6/7 weeks; 25-28^6/7 weeks; 22-24^6/7 weeks. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge; the secondary outcome was return of circulation (ROC).

Results

Among 1022 infants who received DR-CPR, 83% experienced ROC and 64% survived to hospital discharge. GA-stratified hospital survival rates were 83% (≥36 weeks), 66% (33-35 weeks), 60% (29-32 weeks), 52% (25-28 weeks), and 25% (22-24 weeks). Compared with GA ≥ 36 weeks, lower GA was independently associated with decreasing odds of survival (33-35 weeks: adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.46, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.26-0.81; 29-32 weeks: aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.69; 25-28 weeks: aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.41; 22-24 weeks: aOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.10).

Conclusions

In this national registry of infants who received delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DR-CPR), 83% survived the event and two-thirds survived to hospital discharge. These results contribute to defining survival outcomes following DR-CPR across the continuum of gestation.

SUBMITTER: Foglia EE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7321893 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The prognosis in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at hospital arrival is often considered dismal. The use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) for perfusion enhancement during resuscitation has shown variable results. We aimed to investigate outcome in refractory OHCA patients managed conservatively without use of eCPR. METHODS:We included consecutive OHCA patients with refractory arrest or prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the Copenhagen area in 2002-2011. RESULTS:A total of 3992 OHCA patients with resuscitation attempts were included; in 2599, treatment was terminated prehospital, and 1393 (35%) were brought to the hospital either with ROSC (n?=?1285, 92%) or with refractory OHCA (n?=?108, 8%). Of patients brought in with refractory OHCA, 56 (52%) achieved ROSC in the emergency department. There were no differences between patients with refractory OHCA or prehospital ROSC with regard to age, sex, comorbidities, or etiology of OHCA. Time to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival was similar, whereas time to ROSC (when ROSC was achieved) was longer in refractory OHCA patients (EMS, 6 (5-9] vs. 7 [5-10] min, p?=?0.8; ROSC, 15 [9-22] vs. 27 [20-41] min, p?<?0.001). Independent factors associated with transport with refractory OHCA instead of prehospital termination of therapy were OHCA in public (OR, 3.6 [95% CI, 2.2-5.8]; p?<?0.001), witnessed OHCA (OR, 3.7 [2.0-7.1]; p?<?0.001), shockable rhythm (OR, 3.0 [1.9-4.7]; p?<?0.001), younger age (OR, 1.2 [1.1-1.2]; p?<?0.001), and later calendar year (OR, 1.4 [1.2-1.6]; p?<?0.001). Thirty-day survival was 20% in patients with refractory OHCA compared with 42% in patients with prehospital ROSC (p?<?0.001). Four of 28 refractory OHCA patients with duration of resuscitation >?60 min achieved ROSC. No difference in favorable neurological outcome in patients surviving to discharge was found (prehospital ROSC 84% vs. refractory OHCA 86%; p?=?0.7). CONCLUSIONS:Survival after refractory OHCA with ongoing CPR at hospital arrival was significantly lower than among patients with prehospital ROSC. Despite a lower survival, the majority of survivors with both refractory OHCA and prehospital ROSC were discharged with a similar degree of favorable neurological outcome, indicating that continued efforts in spite of refractory OHCA are not in vain and may still lead to favorable outcome even without eCPR.

Project description:Background The role of computed tomography (CT) scans after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest has not been frequently investigated. Early CT scan findings may have many meaningful findings and contribute significantly to patients’ outcome. In this study, we sought to determine whether early CT scans in such patients indirectly improved in-hospital survival. Methods A computerized search of the electronic medical records systems of 2 ECMO centers was conducted. A total of 132 patients who had undergone extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) between September 2014 and January 2022 were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they underwent early CT scans (the treatment group) or did not undergo early CT scans (the control group). The findings of early CT scans and in-hospital survival were investigated. Results A total of 132 patients had undergone ECPR with 71 were male, 61were female and mean age: 48.0±14.3 years. Early CT scans did not improve patient’s in-hospital survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.705; P=0.357]. Overall, a smaller proportion of patients survived in the treatment group (22.5%) than the control group (42.6%; P=0.013). In total, 90 patients were matched in terms of age, initial shockable rhythm, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration, ECMO duration, percutaneous coronary intervention, and cardiac arrest location. In the matched cohort, fewer patients survived in the treatment group (28.9%) than the control group (37.8%; P=0.371), but the difference was not significant. According to a log-rank test, in-hospital survival did not differ significantly before and after matching (P=0.69, and P=0.63, respectively). Thirteen patients (18.3%) had complications during transportation, among which a drop in blood pressure was the most common. Conclusions The in-hospital survival rate between treatment and control group was not different, however, early CT scan after ECPR could help clinicians to gain important information to guide clinical practice.