Dataset Information

Understanding the transition from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation.

ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhytmia, characterized by the chaotic motion of electrical wavefronts in the atria. In clinical practice, AF is classified under two primary categories: paroxysmal AF, short intermittent episodes separated by periods of normal electrical activity; and persistent AF, longer uninterrupted episodes of chaotic electrical activity. However, the precise reasons why AF in a given patient is paroxysmal or persistent is poorly understood. Recently, we have introduced the percolation-based Christensen-Manani-Peters (CMP) model of AF which naturally exhibits both paroxysmal and persistent AF, but precisely how these differences emerge in the model is unclear. In this paper, we dissect the CMP model to identify the cause of these different AF classifications. Starting from a mean-field model where we describe AF as a simple birth-death process, we add layers of complexity to the model and show that persistent AF arises from reentrant circuits which exhibit an asymmetry in their probability of activation relative to deactivation. As a result, different simulations generated at identical model parameters can exhibit fibrillatory episodes spanning several orders of magnitude from a few seconds to months. These findings demonstrate that diverse, complex fibrillatory dynamics can emerge from very simple dynamics in models of AF.

SUBMITTER: Ciacci A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7326608 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun-Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Understanding the transition from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation.

Ciacci Alberto A Falkenberg Max M Manani Kishan A KA Evans Tim S TS Peters Nicholas S NS Christensen Kim K

Physical review research 20200609 2

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhytmia, characterized by the chaotic motion of electrical wavefronts in the atria. In clinical practice, AF is classified under two primary categories: paroxysmal AF, short intermittent episodes separated by periods of normal electrical activity; and persistent AF, longer uninterrupted episodes of chaotic electrical activity. However, the precise reasons why AF in a given patient is paroxysmal or persistent is poorly understood. Recently, we ...[more]

PMID: 32607500

Similar Datasets

Project description:Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) may represent a phenomenon associated with sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) and are being used increasingly as targets of catheter ablation. However, current methods have limited efficacy for characterizing CFAEs important to substrate arrhythmogenicity and do not measure electrogram morphology.The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for quantifying the degree of morphologic heterogeneity in CFAE deflections, and to determine whether there are differences in this measurement between paroxysmal and persistent AF patients.Two successive bipolar CFAEs of length 8.4 seconds each were acquired during AF from two sites each at the ostia of the four pulmonary veins (PVs) and from the anterior and posterior left atrial free wall in patients with paroxysmal AF (N = 10) and long-standing persistent AF (N = 10). Extrinsic and intrinsic features of electrogram shape were used to characterize fractionation in CFAE sequences. The extrinsic parameters were the amplitude, upslope, downslope, and width of each deflection. The intrinsic parameter was the voltage profile as characterized by the sum of absolute values. These measurements were compared to the mean interval between CFAE deflections, a standard fractionation indicator.The variability of intrinsic/extrinsic morphologic parameters was higher in paroxysmal than persistent AF at the left superior PV (P < or =.003), the posterior left atrial free wall, anterior left atrial free wall, left inferior PV, and right superior PV (P <.05 for most parameters), and the right inferior PV (not significant). Mean CFAE deflection intervals were longer at all locations in paroxysmal AF but were significant only at the left superior PV and posterior left atrial free wall (P <.05). Quantitative morphologic parameters were not well correlated with dominant frequency (r(2) <0.32); thus, our new measures are robust to changes in activation rate.A novel method for quantifying CFAEs, independent of activation rate, has been developed. The method demonstrates greater significance in the difference between CFAE morphology in paroxysmal and long-standing AF compared with mean interval between CFAE deflections. The differences identified suggest that CFAE morphology may evolve as AF persists.

Project description:Few data on the thromboembolic (TE) risk of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are available. This study aimed to assess the incidence of TE events in paroxysmal and persistent AF.We performed a subset post hoc analysis of 771 patients with paroxysmal and 463 with persistent AF enrolled in the multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled GISSI-AF trial - comparing the efficacy of valsartan versus placebo in preventing AF recurrences - where the choice of antithrombotic treatment was left to the judgment of the referring physician. TE and major outcome events were centrally validated. AF recurrences were detected by frequent clinic visits and a transtelephonic monitoring device with weekly and symptomatic transmissions.Eighty-five percent of patients had a history of hypertension, and the 7.7% had heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. The mean CHADS2 score was 1.41±0.84. TE and major bleeding events were observed at a low incidence among the overall population at 1-year follow-up (0.97% and 0.81%, respectively). The univariate and multivariable analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of TE, major bleeding events or mortality in paroxysmal and persistent AF patients. TE events were more common among women than men (p=0.02). The follow-up examination showed under- or overtreatment with warfarin in many patients, according to guideline suggestions. Warfarin was more frequently prescribed to patients with persistent AF (p<0.0001) and patients with AF recurrences (p<0.0001). AF recurrences were noninvasively detected in 632 (51.2%) patients. In patients without AF recurrences, the TE event rate was 0.5% versus 1.74%, 1.28%, and 1.18% for those with only symptomatic, only asymptomatic or both symptomatic and asymptomatic AF recurrences, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant, even after adjusting for warfarin treatment and the CHADS2 score (HR 2.93; CI 95%; 0.8-10.9; p=0.11).TE and major bleeding events showed a very low incidence in the GISSI-AF trial population, despite under- or overtreatment with warfarin in many patients. TE events had a similar rate in paroxysmal and persistent AF.NCT00376272.

Dataset Information

Understanding the transition from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation.

Publications

Understanding the transition from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets