Developing a lung nodule management protocol specifically for cardiac CT: Methodology in the DISCHARGE trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Haase R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7327416 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Developing a lung nodule management protocol specifically for cardiac CT: Methodology in the DISCHARGE trial.
Haase Robert R Dodd Jonathan D JD Kauczor Hans-Ulrich HU Kazerooni Ella A EA Dewey Marc M
European journal of radiology open 20200625
<h4>Purpose</h4>In this methodology paper we describe the development of a lung nodule management algorithm specifically for patients undergoing cardiac CT.<h4>Methods</h4>We modified the Lung-RADS algorithm specifically to manage lung nodules incidentally detected on cardiac CT (Lung-RADS for cardiac CT). We will evaluate the modified algorithm as part of the DISCHARGE trial (www.dischargetrial.eu) in which patients with suspected coronary artery disease are randomly assigned to cardiac CT or i ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:A solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is a well-defined radiographic opacity up to 3 cm in diameter that is surrounded by unaltered aerated lung. Frequently, it is an incidental finding on chest radiographs and chest CT scans. Determining the probability of malignancy is the first step in the evaluation of SPN. This can be done by looking at specific risk factors and the rate of radiographic progression. Subsequent management is guided by the type of the nodule. Patients with solid nodules and low pretest probability can be followed radiographically; those with high probability, who are good surgical candidates, can be referred for surgical resection. When the pretest probability is in the intermediate range additional testing such as biopsy should be done. Various modalities are now available to obtain tissue diagnosis. These modalities differ in their yield and complication rate. Patients with SPN should be well informed of each approach's risks and benefits and should be able to make an informed decision regarding the different diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.
| S-EPMC6712257 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA calibration phantom-based method has been developed for predicting small lung nodule volume measurement bias and precision that is specific to a particular computed tomography (CT) scanner and acquisition protocol.MethodsThe approach involves CT scanning a simple reference object with a specific acquisition protocol, analyzing the scan to estimate the fundamental imaging properties of the CT acquisition system, generating numerous simulated images of a target geometry using the fundamental imaging properties, measuring the simulated images with a standard nodule volume segmentation algorithm, and calculating bias and precision performance statistics from the resulting volume measurements. We evaluated the ability of this approach to predict volume measurement bias and precision of Teflon spheres (diameters =4.76, 6.36, and 7.94 mm) placed within an anthropomorphic chest phantom when using 3M Scotch Magic™ tape as the reference object. CT scanning of the spheres was performed with 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 mm slice thickness and spacing.ResultsThe study demonstrated good agreement between predicted volumetric performance and observed volume measurement performance for both volumetric measurement bias and precision. The predicted and observed volume mean for all slice thicknesses was found to be 28% and 13% lower on average than the manufactured sphere volume, respectively. When restricted to 0.625 and 1.25 mm slice thickness scans, which are recommended for small lung nodule volume measurement, we found that the difference between predicted and observed volume coefficient of variation was less than 1.0 %. The approach also showed a resilience to varying CT image acquisition protocols, a critical capability when deploying in a real-world clinical setting.ConclusionsThis is the first report of a calibration phantom-based method's ability to predict both small lung nodule volume measurement bias and precision. Volume measurement bias and precision for small lung nodules can be predicted using simple low-cost reference objects to estimate fundamental CT image characteristics and modeling and simulation techniques. The approach demonstrates an improved method for predicting task specific, clinically relevant measurement performance using advanced and fully automated image analysis techniques and low-cost reference objects.
| S-EPMC10498266 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPneumothorax is a common complication induced by computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous needle biopsy, with a frequency of 17-40.4%. It remains debatable how to predict and prevent the occurrence of post-biopsy pneumothorax. In a real-world setting, we investigated the characteristics associated with pneumothorax in primary lung nodule biopsy.MethodsThis clinical registry cohort study recorded patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary nodules from 10 medical centers from April 2021 to April 2022, and the data were input into the electronic data capture (EDC) system. The eligibility criteria for participants included being within the age range of 18 to 80 years and expressing a willingness to undergo percutaneous puncture biopsy, among other requirements. Conversely, the exclusion criteria included an inability to cooperate throughout the biopsy process and the emergence of new health issues during the study duration resulting in attendance delays, among other factors. This study collected data from 924 patients, out of which 593 were included after exclusion. The essential characteristics, imaging features of pulmonary nodules, and technical factors associated with percutaneous biopsy were recorded. T-tests or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 test, likelihood ratio, or Fisher's exact test were applied for categorical variables for comparison as appropriate, followed by multivariate logistic regression.ResultsThe overall incidence of pneumothorax was 13.0% (77/593), among which timely pneumothorax was 10.3% (61/593), delayed pneumothorax was 2.7% (16/593), and the rate of chest tube placement was 3.4% (20/593). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumothorax in a needle size range of 16-19 G (P=0.129), but the incidence of pneumothorax was lower with 17 G needles than with 18 G. An increased morbidity of pneumothorax was correlated with age (P=0.003), emphysema (P=0.006), and operation time (P=0.002). There was no significant increase in the incidence of pneumothorax between 1 or 2 passes through the pleura (P=0.062). However, multiple pleural passes (3 times) increased the chances of pneumothorax significantly (P=0.022). These risk factors have a certain clinical value in predicting the incidence of post-biopsy pneumothorax, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.749.ConclusionsThe most common post-biopsy complication, pneumothorax, was managed conservatively in most cases. A maximum of two pleural passes does not increase the incidence of pneumothorax, and the 17 G needle is more suitable for percutaneous biopsy of pulmonary nodules in the real world.
| S-EPMC10784109 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Computed tomography (CT) examinations are commonly used to predict lung nodule malignancy in patients, which are shown to improve noninvasive early diagnosis of lung cancer. It remains challenging for computational approaches to achieve performance comparable to experienced radiologists. Here we present NoduleX, a systematic approach to predict lung nodule malignancy from CT data, based on deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). For training and validation, we analyze >1000 lung nodules in images from the LIDC/IDRI cohort. All nodules were identified and classified by four experienced thoracic radiologists who participated in the LIDC project. NoduleX achieves high accuracy for nodule malignancy classification, with an AUC of ~0.99. This is commensurate with the analysis of the dataset by experienced radiologists. Our approach, NoduleX, provides an effective framework for highly accurate nodule malignancy prediction with the model trained on a large patient population. Our results are replicable with software available at http://bioinformatics.astate.edu/NoduleX .
| S-EPMC6006355 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of CT slice thickness, reconstruction algorithm, and radiation dose on quantification of CT features to characterize lung nodules using a chest phantom. Spherical lung nodule phantoms of known densities (-630 and + 100 HU) were inserted into an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. CT scan was performed ten times with relocations. CT data were reconstructed using 12 different imaging settings; three different slice thicknesses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mm, two reconstruction kernels of sharp and standard, and two radiation dose of 30 mAs and 12 mAs. Lesions were segmented using a semiautomated method. Twenty representative CT quantitative features representing CT density and texture were compared using multiple regression analysis. In 100 HU nodule phantoms, 18 and 19 among 20 computer features showed significant difference between different mAs and reconstruction algorithms, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). 20, 19, and 19 computer features showed difference between slice thickness of 5.0 vs 1.25, 5.0 vs 2.5, and 2.5 vs 1.25 mm, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). In -630 HU nodule phantoms, 18 and 19 showed significant difference between different mAs and reconstruction algorithms, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). 18, 11, and 17 computer features showed difference between slice thickness of 5.0 vs 1.25, 5.0 vs 2.5, and 2.5 vs 1.25 mm, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). When comparing the absolute value of regression coefficient, the effect of slice thickness in 100 HU nodule and reconstruction algorithm in -630 HU nodule was greater than the effect of remaining scan parameters. The slice thickness, mAs, and reconstruction algorithm had a significant impact on the quantitative image features. In clinical studies involving deep learning or radiomics, it should be noted that differences in values can occur when using computer features obtained from different CT scan parameters in combination. Therefore, when interpreting the statistical analysis results, it is necessary to reflect the difference in the computer features depending on the scan parameters.
| S-EPMC6381551 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Remarkable progress has been made in image classification and segmentation, due to the recent study of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). To solve the similar problem of diagnostic lung nodule detection in low-dose computed tomography (CT) scans, we propose a new Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) system using CNNs and CT image segmentation techniques. Unlike former studies focusing on the classification of malignant nodule types or relying on prior image processing, in this work, we put raw CT image patches directly in CNNs to reduce the complexity of the system. Specifically, we split each CT image into several patches, which are divided into 6 types consisting of 3 nodule types and 3 non-nodule types. We compare the performance of ResNet with different CNNs architectures on CT images from a publicly available dataset named the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC-IDRI). Results show that our best model reaches a high detection sensitivity of 92.8% with 8 false positives per scan (FPs/scan). Compared with related work, our work obtains a state-of-the-art effect.
| S-EPMC6841817 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To characterize the variability in radiologists' interpretations of computed tomography (CT) studies in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) (including assessment of false-positive rates [FPRs] and sensitivity), to examine factors that contribute to variability, and to evaluate trade-offs between FPRs and sensitivity among different groups of radiologists.The HIPAA-compliant NLST was approved by the institutional review board at each screening center; all participants provided informed consent. NLST radiologists reported overall screening results, nodule-specific findings, and recommendations for diagnostic follow-up. A noncalcified nodule of 4 mm or larger constituted a positive screening result. The FPR was defined as the rate of positive screening examinations in participants without a cancer diagnosis within 1 year. Descriptive analyses and mixed-effects models were utilized. The average odds ratio (OR) for a false-positive result across all pairs of radiologists was used as a measure of variability.One hundred twelve radiologists at 32 screening centers each interpreted 100 or more NLST CT studies, interpreting 72 160 of 75 126 total NLST CT studies in aggregate. The mean FPR for radiologists was 28.7% ± 13.7 (standard deviation), with a range of 3.8%-69.0%. The model yielded an average OR of 2.49 across all pairs of radiologists and an OR of 1.83 for pairs within the same screening center. Mean FPRs were similar for academic versus nonacademic centers (27.9% and 26.7%, respectively) and for centers inside (25.0%) versus outside (28.7%) the U.S. "histoplasmosis belt." Aggregate sensitivity was 96.5% for radiologists with FPRs higher than the median (27.1%), compared with 91.9% for those with FPRs lower than the median (P = .02).There was substantial variability in radiologists' FPRs. Higher FPRs were associated with modestly higher sensitivity.
| S-EPMC3750416 | biostudies-other
Project description:The introduction of lung cancer screening programs will produce an unprecedented amount of chest CT scans in the near future, which radiologists will have to read in order to decide on a patient follow-up strategy. According to the current guidelines, the workup of screen-detected nodules strongly relies on nodule size and nodule type. In this paper, we present a deep learning system based on multi-stream multi-scale convolutional networks, which automatically classifies all nodule types relevant for nodule workup. The system processes raw CT data containing a nodule without the need for any additional information such as nodule segmentation or nodule size and learns a representation of 3D data by analyzing an arbitrary number of 2D views of a given nodule. The deep learning system was trained with data from the Italian MILD screening trial and validated on an independent set of data from the Danish DLCST screening trial. We analyze the advantage of processing nodules at multiple scales with a multi-stream convolutional network architecture, and we show that the proposed deep learning system achieves performance at classifying nodule type that surpasses the one of classical machine learning approaches and is within the inter-observer variability among four experienced human observers.
| S-EPMC5395959 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer has been associated with a high frequency of false positive results because of the high prevalence of indeterminate but usually benign small pulmonary nodules. The acceptability of reducing false-positive rates and diagnostic evaluations by increasing the nodule size threshold for a positive screen depends on the projected balance between benefits and risks. We examined data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to estimate screening CT performance and outcomes for scans with nodules above the 4mm NLST threshold used to classify a CT screen as positive. Outcomes assessed included screening results, subsequent diagnostic tests performed, lung cancer histology and stage distribution, and lung cancer mortality. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the different nodule size thresholds. All statistical tests were two-sided. In 64% of positive screens (11598/18141), the largest nodule was 7 mm or less in greatest transverse diameter. By increasing the threshold, the percentages of lung cancer diagnoses that would have been missed or delayed and false positives that would have been avoided progressively increased, for example from 1.0% and 15.8% at a 5 mm threshold to 10.5% and 65.8% at an 8 mm threshold, respectively. The projected reductions in postscreening follow-up CT scans and invasive procedures also increased as the threshold was raised. Differences across nodules sizes for lung cancer histology and stage distribution were small but statistically significant. There were no differences across nodule sizes in survival or mortality. Raising the nodule size threshold for a positive screen would substantially reduce false-positive CT screenings and medical resource utilization with a variable impact on screening outcomes.
| S-EPMC4207860 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe 2019 Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System version 1.1 (Lung-RADS v1.1) introduced volumetric categories for nodule management. The aims of this study were to report the distribution of Lung-RADS v1.1 volumetric categories and to analyse lung cancer (LC) outcomes within 3 years for exploring personalized algorithm for lung cancer screening (LCS).MethodsSubjects from the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection (MILD) trial were retrospectively selected by National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) criteria. Baseline characteristics included selected pre-test metrics and nodule characterization according to the volume-based categories of Lung-RADS v1.1. Nodule volume was obtained by segmentation with dedicated semi-automatic software. Primary outcome was diagnosis of LC, tested by univariate and multivariable models. Secondary outcome was stage of LC. Increased interval algorithms were simulated for testing rate of delayed diagnosis (RDD) and reduction of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) burden.ResultsIn 1248 NLST-eligible subjects, LC frequency was 1.2% at 1 year, 1.8% at 2 years and 2.6% at 3 years. Nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1 was a strong predictor of LC: positive LDCT showed an odds ratio (OR) of 75.60 at 1 year (p < 0.0001), and indeterminate LDCT showed an OR of 9.16 at 2 years (p = 0.0068) and an OR of 6.35 at 3 years (p = 0.0042). In the first 2 years after negative LDCT, 100% of resected LC was stage I. The simulations of low-frequency screening showed a RDD of 13.6-21.9% and a potential reduction of LDCT burden of 25.5-41%.ConclusionsNodule volume by semi-automatic software allowed stratification of LC risk across Lung-RADS v1.1 categories. Personalized screening algorithm by increased interval seems feasible in 80% of NLST eligible.Key points• Using semi-automatic segmentation of nodule volume, Lung-RADS v1.1 selected 10.8% of subjects with positive CT and 96.87 relative risk of lung cancer at 1 year, compared to negative CT. • Negative low-dose CT by Lung-RADS v1.1 was found in 80.6% of NLST eligible and yielded 40 times lower relative risk of lung cancer at 2 years, compared to positive low-dose CT; annual screening could be preference sensitive in this group. • Semi-automatic segmentation of nodule volume and increased screening interval by volumetric Lung-RADS v1.1 could retrospectively suggest a 25.5-41% reduction of LDCT burden, at the cost of 13.6-21.9% rate of delayed diagnosis.
| S-EPMC7979670 | biostudies-literature