Dataset Information

Clinical evidence for association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with efficacy and safety in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma (NewEC study).

ABSTRACT: Background:The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment over surgery alone and that of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) over neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in resectable esophageal carcinoma remains inconclusive. This study (NewEC) used global data to comprehensively evaluate these comparisons and to provide a preferable strategy for patient subsets. Methods:This study included a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from inception to May 2019 from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and congresses and a registry-based cohort study with patients from Massachusetts General Hospital (Massachusetts, USA) and Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangzhou, China) recruited from November 2000 and June 2017, to cross-validate the comparisons among NCRT versus NCT versus surgery. The GRADE approach was used to assessed quality of evidence in meta-analysis. Neural network machine learning propensity score-matched analysis was used to account for confounding by patient-level characteristics in the cohort study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The study was registered with PROSPERO CRD42017072242 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04027543. Findings:Of 22,070 studies assessed, there were 38 (n = 6,993 patients) eligible RCTs. Additionally, 423 out of 467 screened patients were included in the cohort study. The results from trials showed that NCT had a better OS than surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·79-0·98; high quality) and was only favorable for adenocarcinoma (HR 0·83, 95% CI 0·72-0·96; moderate quality). High-quality evidence showed a significantly better OS for NCRT than surgery alone (HR 0·74, 95% CI 0·66-0·82) for both adenocarcinoma (HR 0·73, 95% CI 0·62-0·86) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (HR 0·73, 95% CI 0·65-0·83). The OS benefit of NCRT over NCT was seen in the pairwise (HR 0·78, 95% CI 0·62-0·99; high quality) and network (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·72-0·93; high quality) meta-analyses, with similar results before (HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·40-0·91) and after (HR 0·44, 95% CI 0·25-0·77) matching in the cohort study, leading to a significantly increased 5-year OS rate in both adenocarcinoma and SCC before and after matching. The increased benefits from NCT or NCRT were not associated with the risk of 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Interpretation:NewEC Study provided high-quality evidence supporting the survival benefits of NCRT or NCT over surgery alone, with NCRT presenting the greatest benefit for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Funding:National Science and Technology Major Project, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, the Guangzhou Science and Technology Major Program, the Medical artificial intelligence project of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, the Guangdong Science and Technology Department, the Guangdong Province Medical Scientific Research Foundation, and Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Intermural Program.

SUBMITTER: Zhou HY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7327891 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical evidence for association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with efficacy and safety in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma (NewEC study).

Zhou Hai-Yu HY Zheng Shao-Peng SP Li An-Lin AL Gao Quan-Long QL Ou Qi-Yun QY Chen Yong-Jian YJ Wu Shao-Tao ST Lin Da-Gui DG Liu Sheng-Bo SB Huang Lu-Yu LY Li Fa-Sheng FS Zhu Hong-Yuan HY Qiao Gui-Bin GB Lanuti Michael M Yao He-Rui HR Yu Yun-Fang YF

EClinicalMedicine 20200627

<h4>Background</h4>The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment over surgery alone and that of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) over neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in resectable esophageal carcinoma remains inconclusive. This study (NewEC) used global data to comprehensively evaluate these comparisons and to provide a preferable strategy for patient subsets.<h4>Methods</h4>This study included a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from inception to May 2019 fro ...[more]

PMID: 32637899

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).BackgroundSeveral studies have reported the outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. However, phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with long-term outcomes and the comparison of different therapeutic strategies are lacking.MethodsStudies involving patients with advanced ESCC treated with preoperative neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were searched through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to July 1, 2022. The outcomes were presented as proportions and pooled respectively by fixed or random effect model depending on the heterogeneity between studies. All analyses were performed using the R packages meta 5.5-0 and meta-for 3.4-0.ResultsThirty trials involving 1406 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate for neoadjuvant immunotherapy was 0.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.33). The pCR rate of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) was significantly higher than that of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (nICT) (nICRT: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.65; nICT: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26-0.33; p=0.03). No significant difference in efficacy was observed between the different chemotherapy agents and treatment cycles. The incidences of grade 1-2 and 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.84) and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.09-0.25), respectively. Patients treated with nICRT and carboplatin had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs compared with those treated with nICT (nICRT: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.17-0.77; nICT: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07-0.22; p=0.03) and cisplatin (carboplatin: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.53; cisplatin: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.09; p<0.01).ConclusionNeoadjuvant immunotherapy has good efficacy and safety profiles in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Additional RCTs with long-term survival data are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundNeoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy has been recognized as an effective treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, though still has a dismal prognosis. Antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) protein improve survival in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) compared with chemotherapy in second-line therapy. However, neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy has not been tested in locally advanced ESCC. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pd-1 inhibitor in neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsIn this study, we administered 28 adults with untreated, surgically resectable locally advanced ESCC. PD-1 inhibitor with chemotherapy [albumin paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 + carboplatin with an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1] were administered every 3 weeks intravenously, and surgery was performed approximately 3-5 weeks after the second dose. The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this regimen.ResultsIn all, 28 locally advanced ESCC patients were enrolled, 27 patients received surgery, 9 (33.3%) patients' postoperative pathological specimens suggested pCR, and 11 (40.7%) patients' primary tumor suggested complete response. Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor with chemotherapy had an acceptable side-effect profile, 26 patients' tumors were completely resected (96.3% were R0). According to the RESIST v.1.1, the response in all 27 patients was evaluated by a computed tomography (CT) scan before surgery, showing 12 patients with complete response (CR), 12 with partial response (PR), and 3 with stable disease (SD). For surgical procedures, 15 (55.6%) patients underwent minimal invasive surgery, 4 (14.8%) underwent right transthoracic open esophagectomy, and 8 (29.6%) underwent hybrid approaches.ConclusionsThe novel treatment of PD-1 inhibitor with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced ESCC produced satisfactory outcomes: an unprecedentedly high pCR rate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a high R0 resection rate, and a low-toxicity profile were achieved. The long-term efficiency of this novel treatment and the validity of the present findings should be confirmed with longer follow-up and prospective comparative trials.

Project description:This study compares neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with perioperative chemotherapy (pCT) for patients with resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in terms of toxicity, postoperative complications, pathologic response, and survival.This study retrospectively analyzed and compared 313 patients with resectable esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with either nCRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel 41.4 Gy, n = 176) or pCT (epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine, n = 137).The baseline and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The ability to deliver all planned preoperative cycles was greater in the nCRT group (92.0 vs. 76.6%). Whereas nCRT was associated with a higher rate of grades 3 and 4 esophagitis, pCT was associated with a higher rate of grades 3 and 4 thromboembolic events, febrile neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, cardiac complications, and electrolyte imbalances. Two patients in the pCT group died during neoadjuvant treatment due to febrile neutropenia. More postoperative cardiac complications occurred in the nCRT group. All other postoperative complications and the in-hospital mortality rate (nCRT, 4.7%; pCT, 2.3%) were comparable. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 15.1% after nCRT and 6.9% after pCT. Radicality of surgery was comparable (R0: 93.0 vs. 91.6%). The median overall survival was 35 months after nCRT versus 36 months after pCT.For patients with esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma, chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabin lead to equal oncologic outcomes in terms of radical resection rates, lymphadenectomy, patterns of recurrent disease, and (disease-free) survival. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a considerably lower level of severe adverse events and should therefore be the preferred protocol until a well-powered randomized controlled trial provides different insights.

Dataset Information

Clinical evidence for association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with efficacy and safety in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma (NewEC study).

Publications

Clinical evidence for association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with efficacy and safety in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma (NewEC study).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets