Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Personality traits are directly associated with anti-black prejudice in the United States.


ABSTRACT: Modern psychological theories postulate that individual differences in prejudice are determined by social and ideological attitudes instead of personality. For example, the dual-process motivational (DPM) model argues that personality does not directly associate with prejudice when controlling for the attitudinal variables that capture the authoritarian-conservatism motivation and the dominance motivation. Previous studies testing the DPM model largely relied on convenience samples and/or European samples, and have produced inconsistent results. Here we examined the extent to which anti-black prejudice was associated with the Big Five personality traits and social and ideological attitudes (authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, political party affiliation) in two large probability samples of the general population (N1 = 3,132; N2 = 2,483) from the American National Election Studies (ANES). We performed structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the causal assumptions between the latent variables and used survey weights to generate estimates that were representative of the population. Different from prior theories, across both datasets we found that two personality traits, agreeableness and conscientiousness, were directly associated with anti-black prejudice when controlling for authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and political party affiliation. We also found that a substantial part of the associations between personality traits and anti-black prejudice were mediated through those social and ideological attitudes, which might serve as candidates for prejudice-reduction interventions in the real world.

SUBMITTER: Lin C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7329088 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Personality traits are directly associated with anti-black prejudice in the United States.

Lin Chujun C   Alvarez R Michael RM  

PloS one 20200701 7


Modern psychological theories postulate that individual differences in prejudice are determined by social and ideological attitudes instead of personality. For example, the dual-process motivational (DPM) model argues that personality does not directly associate with prejudice when controlling for the attitudinal variables that capture the authoritarian-conservatism motivation and the dominance motivation. Previous studies testing the DPM model largely relied on convenience samples and/or Europe  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11364352 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5471137 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9550879 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4845100 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6864380 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2800299 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5375159 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3014690 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3795298 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7901034 | biostudies-literature