Dataset Information

Feasibility and prognostic benefit of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: BackgroundThe optimal treatment for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involving adjacent organs (T3 or T4) and/or cN2 remains unclear. We investigated whether or not induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) followed by surgery improves the survival.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with NSCLC involving the adjacent organs and/or cN2 who underwent ICRT followed by surgery at our hospital from 2006 to 2018. Presurgical treatment consisted of 2 courses of platinum-doublet and concurrent radiotherapy (40–50 Gy) to the tumor and involved field.ResultsAll 84 patients completed ICRT. One patient died after completion of ICRT due to bacterial pneumonia. Radiological responses to ICRT were a complete response (CR), n=1; partial response (PR), n=48; stable disease (SD), n=32; and progressive disease (PD), n=2 (overall response rate: 58.3%). Eighty-one patients underwent radical surgery. The procedures included lobectomy, n=66; bilobectomy, n=7; pneumonectomy, n=6; and segmentectomy, n=2 (including 49 extended resections). Seventy-three patients (90%) underwent complete resection. The postoperative morbidity rate was 30%. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 1.2% and 2.4%, respectively. A pathological CR (Ef3) and major response (Ef2) were achieved in 17 (21.0%) and 38 (46.9%) patients, respectively; a minor response (Ef1) was observed in 26 (32%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 58.0% and 45.6%, respectively. The median survival time was 73.2 months. Based on the response to ICRT, patients with radiological CR or PR showed better 5-year OS than those with SD (63.7% vs. 40.0%, P=0.020). Patients with Ef3 or Ef2 demonstrated a much better 5-year OS than those with Ef1 (65.0% vs. 24.4%, P=0.005).ConclusionsICRT followed by surgery for patients with NSCLC involving the adjacent organs and/or cN2 was feasible and improved the survival. A CR/PR or Ef2/Ef3 after ICRT led to a better prognosis.

SUBMITTER: Tanahashi M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7330299 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundConcurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT-AC) is currently recommended as the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NAC-CCRT) is an alternative strategy for decreasing tumor size and controlling micrometastases before main treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare survival outcomes between LA-NPC patients treated with CCRT-AC and those treated with NAC-CCRT.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive histologically confirmed LA-NPC patients that were treated with NAC-CCRT or CCRT-AC at Siriraj Hospital during the March 2010 to October 2014 study period. CCRT in both protocols consisted of 3-week cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 with concurrent radiotherapy. Either NAC or AC consisted of 3-week cycles of cisplatin on day 1 and fluorouracil/leucovorin on days 1-4 for a maximum three cycles. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). Flexible parametric survival analysis was used, because the proportional hazards assumption of Cox regression was violated.ResultsOf the 266 LA-NPC patients that received treatment during the study period, 79 received NAC-CCRT and 187 received CCRT-AC. Median follow-up was 37 months. Significantly more patients with advanced clinical stage (stage IVA-IVB) received NAC-CCRT (86% in NAC-CCRT vs. 29% in CCRT-AC; p < 0.001). Compared to CCRT-AC in crude analysis, 3-year and 5-year OS of NAC-CCRT were 72% vs. 86% and 62% vs. 75% respectively (p = 0.059). Interestingly, the 3-year and 5-year post-estimation adjusted OS was 84% and 74% for NAC-CCRT and 81% and 70% for CCRT-AC, respectively (HR: 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-1.56; p = 0.571). Also, adjusted analysis of distant-metastasis survival, NAC-CCRT showed HR was 0.79 (95% CI:0.37-1.72, p = 0.557). Conversely, adjusted analysis of locoregional relapse (LLR)-free survival revealed NAC-CCRT to have a significantly higher risk of LRR (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.98-4.87; p = 0.057).ConclusionsThe results suggested that prognosis in the NAC-CCRT treated patients was not superior to that of the CCRT-AC treated individuals. In patients that receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, locoregional relapse should be of concern. High-risk distant metastasis patients (N3 stage) that could achieve survival advantage from NAC-CCRT is an interesting and important topic for further study.

Dataset Information

Feasibility and prognostic benefit of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets