From west to east: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in Day Surgery Center.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Jiang L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7330347 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
From west to east: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in Day Surgery Center.
Journal of thoracic disease 20200501 5
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10797359 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The management of hemothorax (spontaneous or, more often, due to thoracic trauma lesions), follows basic tenets well-respected by cardiothoracic surgeons. In most, a non-operative approach is adequate and safe, with a defined group of patients requiring only tube thoracostomy. Only a minority of patients need a surgical intervention due to retained hemothorax, persistent bleeding or incoming complications, as pleural empyema or entrapped lung. In the early 1990s, the rapid technological developments determined an increase of diagnostic and therapeutical indications for multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) as the gold standard therapy for retained and persistent hemothorax, allowing an earlier diagnosis, total clots removal and better tubes placement with less morbidity, reduced post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the timing for draining hemothorax, but best results are obtained when the drainage is performed within the first 5 days after the onset. The traditional multi-port approach has evolved in the last years into an uniportal approach that mimics open surgical vantage points utilizing a non-rib-spreading single small incision. Currently, in experienced hands, this technique is used for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions as hemothorax evacuation as like as the more complex procedures, such as lobectomies or bronchial sleeve and vascular reconstructions.
| S-EPMC5639032 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesLu's approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (LVATS), which derives from UVATS, is a novel surgical approach for VATS and carries out micro-innovation for lung cancer resection. The objective of this study is to elucidate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this novel surgical approach.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent a curative thoracoscopic lobectomy between Mar. 2021 and Mar. 2022, were retrospectively collected, and analyzed. According to whether applied Lu's approach during the VATS operation, patients were divided into the LVATS group and the UVATS group. The propensity score (PS) matching method was used to reduce selection bias by creating two groups. After generating the PSs, 1:1 ratio and nearest-neighbor score matching was completed. Perioperative variables, including the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node stations dissected, total drainage volume, drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, pain score (VAS, Visual Analogue Scale) on the postoperative first day (POD1) and third day (POD3), and incidence of postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed statistically with P<0.05 defined as statistically significant.ResultsA total of 182 patients were identified, among whom 86 patients underwent LVATS and 96 UVATS. Propensity matching produced 62 pairs in this retrospective study. There were no deaths during perioperative period. Patients in the LVATS group experienced a shorter operation time (88 (75, 106) VS 122 (97, 144)min, P <0.001), less intraoperative blood loss(20 (20, 30) VS 25 (20, 50)ml, P = 0.021), shorten incision length (2.50 (2.50, 2.50) VS 3.00 (3.00, 3.50)cm, P <0.001), and more drainage volume (460 (310, 660) VS 345 (225, 600)ml, P = 0.041) than patients in the UVATS group. There was not significant difference in the lymph node stations dissected(5 (4, 5) VS 5 (4, 5), P = 0.436), drainage duration (3 (3, 4) VS 3 (3, 4)days, P = 0.743), length of postoperative hospital stay (4 (4, 5) VS 4 (4, 6)days, P = 0.608), VAS on the POD1(4 (4, 4) VS 4 (4, 4), P = 0.058)and POD3 (3 (3, 4) VS 4 (3, 4), P = 0.219), and incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.521) between the two groups.ConclusionsLu's approach is a safe and feasible approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the lobectomy of NSCLC. This approach can shorten surgical time, reduce incision length and intraoperative blood loss.
| S-EPMC11198770 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery programs have reduced complications and shortened hospital stays after lung resection. This study aimed to determine whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery performed as a two-day surgery for lung neoplasms was safe and cost-effective.MethodsThis retrospective, propensity-matched, cohort analysis was conducted from January 2020 to August 2020. Among 959 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, 739 underwent inpatient surgery and 220 underwent two-day surgery. Propensity-matched analysis, incorporating preoperative variables, was used to compare postoperative complications, post-discharge follow-up results, and hospitalization costs between the groups.ResultsPropensity matching estimated 218 patients in each group. The mean length of hospital stay was shorter in the two-day surgery group (2.17 ± 0.89 days) than in the inpatient surgery group (6.31 ± 2.13 days) (P < 0.001). Delayed removal of chest tubes accounted for over half of the delayed discharges in the inpatient (17 [54.8%]) and two-day surgery (13 [65.0%]) groups. The postoperative pneumonia/atelectasis incidence was lower in the two-day surgery group than in the inpatient surgery group (P = 0.032). The two-day surgery group patients were readmitted to the hospital due to massive pleural effusion, pneumothorax, fever, severe chest pain, and physical weakness. The mean total hospitalization cost in the two-day surgery group was lower than that in the inpatient surgery group (¥ 33,926.1 versus ¥ 38,422.7, P < 0.001). Basic medical, nursing, drug, laboratory-related, and nonsurgical consumable costs in the two-day surgery group were significantly reduced.ConclusionsTwo-day surgery is a safe, feasible, and cost-effective procedure for selected patients with lung neoplasms when combined with accurate preoperative evaluations, successful intraoperative assessments, and effective postoperative health care guidance.
| S-EPMC9338576 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe clinical efficacy of robot-assisted thoracic surgeries has been explored by numerous recent studies. Nonetheless, since current standard robotic systems (da Vinci Xi system) were intended for multiportal surgical processes and robotic staplers were still unavailable in the developing world, obstacles still remain concerning the feasibility of uniportal robotic surgeries.MethodsA hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) modality utilizing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) staplers was investigated in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes concerning patients receiving hybrid uniportal RATS between August 2022 and September 2022 were collected.ResultsA total of 40 patients were included in this study. Most of the patients (23/40, 57.5%) received hybrid uniportal RATS lobectomies. One conversion from uniportal RATS to biportal process was encountered due to extensive adhesions discovered intraoperatively. The median procedural duration was 76 min [interquartile range (IQR), 61-99 min], and the median blood loss volume was 50 mL (IQR, 50-50 mL). A median stay length of three days (IQR, 2-4 days) was recorded. Eleven patients (27.5%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade I-II postoperative complications, while no grade III-IV complications were observed. Aside from this, none of the patients were readmitted or died within 30 days post-surgery.ConclusionsThe feasibility of hybrid uniportal RATS procedures using VATS staplers has been preliminarily validated. For early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients, such a procedure might clinical efficacy comparable to that of uniportal RATS utilizing robotic staplers.
| S-EPMC9922775 | biostudies-literature
Project description:With the evolution of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), the technological aids have come to help skill surgeons to improve the results in thoracic surgery and feasible to perform a complex surgery. The technological aids are divided into three important groups, which make surgical steps easy to perform, besides reducing surgical time and surgical accidents in the hands of experienced surgeons. The groups are: (I) conventional thoracoscopic instruments; (II) sealing devices using in uniportal VATS; (III) high definition cameras, robotic arms prototype and the future robotic aids for uniportal VATS surgery. Uniportal VATS is an example of the continuing search for methods that aim to provide the patient a surgical cure of the disease with the lowest morbidity. That is the reason companies are creating more and new technologies, but the surgeon have to choose properly and to know how, when and where is the moment to use each new aids to avoid mistakes. The future of the thoracic surgery is based on evolution of surgical procedures and innovations to try to reduce even more the surgical and anesthetic trauma. This article summarizes the technological aids to improve and help a thoracoscopics surgeons perform a uniportal VATS feasible and safe.
| S-EPMC5638310 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe major advantages of robot-assisted surgery are the fine field of view provided by the high-precision three-dimensional (3D) images and the good operability provided by the robotic arms that enables precise movements. A growing number of retrospective studies have compared robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but the number of cases is limited and the results are contradictory.MethodsWe studied the medical records of primary lung cancer patients who underwent lobectomy with lymph node dissection between 2017 and 2020. Four hundred and eleven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria in this study (RATS: 103; VATS: 308). We compared the perioperative factors and postoperative results of the VATS and RATS groups. Further, we adjusted background factors using propensity score matching (PSM) then compared the results of 200 patients (100 patients in each group). In this study, we matched interlobar fissure completeness, which affects operative difficulty and operative time; however, this has been superficially compared in previous studies.ResultsAfter PSM, a significant difference was observed in the intraoperative blood loss (RATS: 53.3 mL, VATS: 120.3 mL, P=0.04). The rates of surgical complications were comparable between the groups (10.0% vs. 13.0%, P=0.66) with similar mean operation times (RATS: 215.0 min, VATS: 210.1 min, P=0.57). The mean postoperative stay in the RATS group was shorter than that in the VATS group (10.0 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.04).ConclusionsInitial experience of RATS had no obvious drawbacks when compared with that of VATS on propensity-matched analysis.
| S-EPMC9264105 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:There is an increasing incidence rate of ground-glass opacity (GGO), especially for multiple GGOs (?2). Whether it is safe and feasible to have bilateral simultaneous surgical resection remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to summarize the experience of surgical resection of patients with multiple GGOs in our Hospital in recent years, and to discuss the above questions. METHODS:Clinical datas of patients who underwent one-stage bilateral uni-portal VATS resections of multiple pulmonary ground glass opacities and had routine pathological examination were collected from May 2016 to May 2019 in our hospital. RESULTS:A total of 34 patients underwent simultaneous bilateral surgical resection of multiple GGO lesions, 28 were women,6 were men, the average age of total patients was 57.9?±?6.7?years. All patients underwent bilateral uni-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (Uni-portal VATS), the average intraoperative blood loss was 100.9?±?67.7?ml, the average operation time was 140?± 74.8?min, the average thoracic drainage time was 2.8?±?3.1?days, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 4.2?±?4.3?days. Postoperative complications including: 2 cases of infection, 3 cases of atrial fibrillation, and 5 cases of persistent air leakage for more than 3?days. All of them improved after treatment, and there were no serious complications and deaths in perioperative period. A total of 76 GGO lesions were resected, with a total malignancy rate of 81.6%, including 40 were pure GGO, of which 28 were malignant (70%), and the average diameter of them were 9.6?±?3.8?mm; 36 were mixed GGO, of which 34 were malignant (94.4%), the average diameter of them were 15.6?±?6.6?mm.Mean postoperative follow-up was 28.4 (range, 3-39) months. There was neither recurrence nor deaths at final follow-up. CONCLUSION:The malignancy rate of multiple GGOs is high. Therefore, when the lung function is allowed,one-stage bilateral uni-portal VATS can be considered. According to experience of main surgeon and the frozen biopsy, either sub-lobar resection or lobectomy was acceptable. The risk of postoperative complications and the prognosis were optimal.
| S-EPMC7178615 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesLymph node dissection (LND) with robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) in lung cancer surgery has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare LND surgical results between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RATS.MethodsWe retrospectively compared perioperative parameters, including the incidence of LND-associated complications (chylothorax, recurrent and/or phrenic nerve paralysis and bronchopleural fistula), lymph node (LN) counts and postoperative locoregional recurrence, among 390 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent lobectomy and mediastinal LND by RATS (n = 104) or VATS (n = 286) at our institution.ResultsThe median total dissected LN numbers significantly differed between the RATS and the VATS groups (RATS: 18, VATS: 15; P < 0.001). They also significantly differed in right upper zone and hilar (#2R + #4R + #10L) (RATS: 12, VATS: 10; P = 0.002), left lower paratracheal and hilar (#4L + #10L) (RATS: 4, VATS: 3; P = 0.019), aortopulmonary zone (#5 + #6) (RATS: 3, VATS: 2; P = 0.001) and interlobar and lobar (#11 + #12) LNs (RATS: 7, VATS: 6; P = 0.041). The groups did not significantly differ in overall nodal upstaging (P = 0.64), total blood loss (P = 0.69) or incidence of LND-associated complications (P = 0.77).ConclusionsIn this comparison, it was suggested that more LNs could be dissected using RATS than VATS, especially in bilateral superior mediastinum and hilar regions. Accumulation of more cases and longer observation periods are needed to verify whether RATS can provide the acceptable quality of LND and local control of lung cancer.
| S-EPMC8691695 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In conventional multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, devices such as cotton-tipped applicators are used instead of graspers to avoid injuring the fragile lung tissue while stabilizing the lung and securing the surgical visual field. However, in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, which requires the simultaneous use of multiple instruments, the instruments tend to interfere with each other during the procedure because they share a single incisional port. Here, we describe a simple, easy and cost-effective lung retraction technique using cotton swabs to solve the problem. We present this technique and comment on its advantages, including decreased cost and improved surgical visualization.
| S-EPMC8560209 | biostudies-literature