Dataset Information

Two latent classes of diagnostic and treatment procedures among traumatic brain injury inpatients.

ABSTRACT: To characterize latent classes of diagnostic and/or treatment procedures among hospitalized U.S. adults, 18-64 years, with primary diagnosis of TBI from 2004-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Samples, latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to 10 procedure groups and differences between latent classes on injury, patient, hospital and healthcare utilization outcome characteristics were modeled using multivariable regression. Using 266,586 eligible records, LCA resulted in two classes of hospitalizations, namely, class I (n?=?217,988) (mostly non-surgical) and class II (n?=?48,598) (mostly surgical). Whereas orthopedic procedures were equally likely among latent classes, skin-related, physical medicine and rehabilitation procedures as well as behavioral health procedures were more likely among class I, and other types of procedures were more likely among class II. Class II patients were more likely to have moderate-to-severe TBI, to be admitted on weekends, to urban, medium-to-large hospitals in Midwestern, Southern or Western regions, and less likely to be?>?30 years, female or non-White. Class II patients were also less likely to be discharged home and necessitated longer hospital stays and greater hospitalization charges. Surgery appears to distinguish two classes of hospitalized patients with TBI with divergent healthcare needs, informing the planning of healthcare services in this target population.

SUBMITTER: Beydoun HA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7331666 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Two latent classes of diagnostic and treatment procedures among traumatic brain injury inpatients.

Beydoun Hind A HA Butt Catherine C Beydoun May A MA Eid Shaker M SM Zonderman Alan B AB Johnstone Brick B

Scientific reports 20200702 1

To characterize latent classes of diagnostic and/or treatment procedures among hospitalized U.S. adults, 18-64 years, with primary diagnosis of TBI from 2004-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Samples, latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to 10 procedure groups and differences between latent classes on injury, patient, hospital and healthcare utilization outcome characteristics were modeled using multivariable regression. Using 266,586 eligible records, LCA resulted in two classes of hospitalizations, ...[more]

PMID: 32616834

Similar Datasets

Project description:Heterogeneity of injury severity among children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) classified by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) makes comparisons across research cohorts, enrollment in clinical trials, and clinical predictions of outcomes difficult. The present study uses latent class analysis (LCA) to distinguish severity subgroups from a prospective cohort of 433 children 2.5-15 years of age with TBI who were recruited from two level 1 pediatric trauma centers. Indicator variables available within 48 h post-injury including emergency department (ED) GCS, hospital motor GCS, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), Rotterdam Score, hypotension in the ED, and pre-hospital loss of consciousness, intubation, seizures, and sedation were evaluated to define subgroups. To understand whether latent class subgroups were predictive of clinically meaningful outcomes, the Pediatric Injury Functional Outcome Scale (PIFOS) at 6 and 12 months, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function at 12 months, were compared across subgroups. Then, outcomes were examined by GCS (primary) and AIS (secondary) classification alone to assess whether LCA provided improved outcome prediction. LCA identified four distinct increasing severity subgroups (1-4). Unlike GCS classification, mean outcome differences on PIFOS at 6 months showed decreasing function across classes. PIFOS differences relative to the lowest latent class (LC1) were: LC2 2.27 (0.83, 3.72), LC3 3.99 (1.88, 6.10), and LC4 11.2 (7.04, 15.4). Differences in 12 month outcomes were seen between the most and least severely injured groups. Differences in outcomes in relation to AIS were restricted to the most and less severely injured at both time points. This study distinguished four latent classes that are clinically meaningful, distinguished a more homogenous severe injury group, and separated children by 6-month functional outcomes better than GCS alone. Systematic reporting of these variables would allow comparisons across research cohorts, potentially improve clinical predictions, and increase sensitivity to treatment effects in clinical trials.

Project description:The diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging in the acute setting because the symptoms are nonspecific and often transient, or they develop with a delay. In these cases, the criteria for acute head imaging are frequently not fulfilled. This may lead to missed diagnoses in emergency care. There is a need for developing a rapid diagnostic test to verify the presence of TBI using body fluids. Blood, urine, and saliva samples from 11 adult patients (mean age 64 years, SD 24 years) with acute and clinically diagnosed TBI, and 12 healthy volunteers were collected at Turku University Hospital during a period of 5 months. The injuries necessitated hospitalization for at least one day. The TBIs were classified mild in nine cases and severe in two cases. The mean period between the trauma and the time for obtaining the samples was 27 h, SD 11 h. The samples were analyzed in an ISO-certified laboratory for the number of lectin-bound glycan molecules indicating destruction of nerve tissue. The screening was performed on several possible glycans for binding, and the measurement by degree of fluorescence. In the analysis, the group of patients with TBI was compared with healthy volunteers. The results showed a significant decrease (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum two-sided test) in the level of two glycans in plasma, but no significant increase for any glycan; in saliva, one glycan showed a significant increase in the TBI group; in urine, three glycans were significantly different between the groups (one showed an increase, whereas two showed a decrease). The results support the idea of conducting more research on how diagnostic glycans could be detected in body fluids after TBI. As a proof-of-concept, significant changes in the concentration of five glycans were found in plasma, saliva, and urine between TBI patients and healthy controls. This may enable the development of a rapid body fluid-based point-of-care test to identify patients with TBI after a head injury.

Project description:Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is important for neuronal survival and regeneration. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic values of serum BDNF in traumatic brain injury (TBI). We examined serum BDNF in two independent cohorts of TBI cases presenting to the emergency departments (EDs) of the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH; n?=?76) and San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH, n?=?80), and a control group of JHH ED patients without TBI (n?=?150). Findings were subsequently validated in the prospective, multi-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) Pilot study (n?=?159). We investigated the association between BDNF, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and recovery from TBI at 6 months in the TRACK-TBI Pilot cohort. Incomplete recovery was defined as having either post-concussive syndrome or a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score <8 at 6 months. Median day-of-injury BDNF concentrations (ng/mL) were lower among TBI cases (JHH TBI, 17.5 and SFGH TBI, 13.8) than in JHH controls (60.3; p?=?0.0001). Among TRACK-TBI Pilot subjects, median BDNF concentrations (ng/mL) were higher in mild (8.3) than in moderate (4.3) or severe TBI (4.0; p?=?0.004. In the TRACK-TBI cohort, the 75 (71.4%) subjects with very low BDNF values (i.e., <the 1st percentile for non-TBI controls, <14.2?ng/mL) had higher odds of incomplete recovery than those who did not have very low values (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-11.0). The area under the receiver operator curve for discriminating complete and incomplete recovery was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.52-0.78) for BDNF, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.49-0.73) for GFAP, and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.43-0.66) for UCH-L1. The addition of GFAP/UCH-L1 to BDNF did not improve outcome prediction significantly. Day-of-injury serum BDNF is associated with TBI diagnosis and also provides 6-month prognostic information regarding recovery from TBI. Thus, day-of-injury BDNF values may aid in TBI risk stratification.

Dataset Information

Two latent classes of diagnostic and treatment procedures among traumatic brain injury inpatients.

Publications

Two latent classes of diagnostic and treatment procedures among traumatic brain injury inpatients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure