Motorized spiral enteroscopy-assisted ERCP after Roux-en-Y reconstructive surgery and bilioenteric anastomosis: first clinical case.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Beyna T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7332831 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Motorized spiral enteroscopy-assisted ERCP after Roux-en-Y reconstructive surgery and bilioenteric anastomosis: first clinical case.
Beyna Torsten T Schneider Markus M Höllerich Jörg J Neuhaus Horst H
VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20200514 7
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and study aimsFail to reach the bilioenteric anastomosis is the main cause of treatment failure during single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (SBE-assisted ERCP) in patients after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. We aim to evaluate factors influencing the endoscopic insertion failure.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 231 cases undergoing SBE-assisted ERCP from January 2016 to December 2021. Treatment details and outcomes were studied to analyze the factors involved in endoscopic insertion failure.ResultsThe enteroscopy success rate and procedural success rate were 88.3% and 84.4%. Incidence of postoperative adverse events was 3.9%. No serious adverse events occurred. Risk factors of endoscopic insertion failure include first ERCP attempt, side to side anastomosis at the Rou-Y anastomosis, the use of Endo-GIA anastomosis, three bowel lumens seen at the Rou-Y anastomosis under endoscopy, steep angle of the afferent loop at the Rou-Y anastomosis with a U-shape, length of the afferent loop ≥ 50 cm, and twisted afferent loop. Among which the multifactorial analysis suggested that the presence of three bowel lumens at the Rou-Y anastomosis and twisted afferent loop were independent risk factors for enteroscopy failure. For case with twisted afferent loop, the use of a transparent cap with X-ray-assisted guidance during insertion is an effective strategy to improve the success rate.ConclusionsSBE-assisted ERCP is safe and effective in patients after bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. The severity of afferent loop twisting and Rou-Y anastomosis shape were risk factors for endoscopic insertion failure. Surgeons should take into account the feasibility of postoperative ERCP treatment at the time of operation.
| S-EPMC11924908 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) anatomy, which is increasing in frequency given the rise of obesity. Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) and enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (EA-ERCP) are distinct approaches with their respective strengths and weaknesses. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the procedural time, rates of success and adverse events of each method. Patients and methods A search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed from inception to October 2018 for studies reporting outcomes of LA or EA-ERCP in patients with RYGB anatomy. Studies using single, double, 'short' double-balloon or spiral enteroscopy were included in the EA-ERCP arm. Outcomes of interest included procedural time, papilla identification, papilla cannulation, therapeutic success and adverse events. Therapeutic success was defined as successful completion of the originally intended diagnostic or therapeutic indication for ERCP. Results A total of 3859 studies were initially identified using our search strategy, of which 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of therapeutic success was significantly higher in LA-ERCP (97.9 %; 95 % CI: 96.7-98.7 %) with little heterogeneity (I 2 = 0.0 %) when compared to EA-ERCP (73.2 %; 95 % CI: 62.5-82.6 %) with significant heterogeneity (I 2 : 80.2 %). Conversely, the pooled rate of adverse events was significantly higher in LA-ERCP (19.0 %; 95 % CI: 12.6-26.4 %) when compared to EA-ERCP (6.5 %; 95% CI: 3.9-9.6 %). The pooled mean procedure time for LA-ERCP was 158.4 minutes (SD ± 20) which was also higher than the mean pooled procedure time for EA-ERCP at 100.5 minutes (SD ± 19.2). Conclusions LA-ERCP is significantly more effective than EA-ERCP in patients with RYGB but is associated with a higher rate of adverse events and longer procedural time.
| S-EPMC7035133 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5989127 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) is a new endoscopic procedure to perform ERCP in Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate technical success, clinical success and adverse effects of EDGE and compare it to laparoscopic ERCP (LA-ERCP) and balloon ERCP (BE-ERCP). Patients and methods We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Google-Scholar, LILACS, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify studies reporting on EDGE, LA-ERCP, and BE-ERCP. The primary outcome was to evaluate technical and clinical success of all three procedures and the secondary analysis focused on calculating the pooled rate of all adverse events (AEs), along with the commonly reported AE subtypes. Results Twenty-four studies on 1268 patients were included in our analysis with the majority of the population being males with mean age 53.72 years. Pooled rates of technical and clinical success with EDGE wer 95.5 % and 95.9 %, with LA-ERCP were 95.3 % and 92.9 % and were BE-ERCP were 71.4 % and 58.7 %, respectively. Pooled rates of all AEs with EDGE were 21.9 %, with LA-ERCP 17.4 % and with BE-ERCP 8.4 %. Stent migration was the most common AE with EDGE with 13.3 % followed by bleeding with 6.6 %. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the technical and clinical success of EDGE procedure is better than BE-ERCP and comparable to that of LA-ERCP in RYGB patients. EDGE also has a similar safety profile as compared to LA-ERCP but has higher AE rate as compared to BE-ERCP.
| S-EPMC6976316 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMotorized Spiral Enteroscopy (MSE) reduces procedure time and increases insertion depth into the small bowel; however, there is scarce evidence on factors affecting MSE efficacy.AimsTo evaluate diagnostic yield and adverse events of MSE including patients with prior major abdominal surgery.MethodsA prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing MSE from June 2019 to December 2021. Demographic characteristics, procedure time, depth of maximum insertion (DMI), technical success, diagnostic yield, and adverse events were collected.ResultsSeventy-four anterograde (54.4%) and 62 retrograde (45.6%) enteroscopies were performed in 117 patients (64 males, median age 67 years). Fifty patients (42.7%) had prior major abdominal surgery. Technical success was 91.9% for anterograde and 90.3% for retrograde route. Diagnostic yield was 71.6% and 61.3%, respectively. The median DMI was 415 cm (264-585) for anterograde and 120 cm (37-225) for retrograde enteroscopy. In patients with prior major abdominal surgery, MSE showed significantly longer small bowel insertion time (38 vs 29 min, p = 0.004), with similar diagnostic yield (61 vs 71.4%, p = 0.201) and DMI (315 vs 204 cm, p = 0.226). The overall adverse event rate was 10.3% (SAE 1.5%), with no differences related to prior abdominal surgery (p = 0.598). Patients with prior surgeries directly involving the gastrointestinal tract showed lower DMI (189 vs 374 cm, p = 0.019) with equal exploration time (37.5 vs 38 min, p = 0.642) compared to those with other abdominal surgeries.ConclusionsMSE is effective and safe in patients with major abdominal surgery, although longer procedure times were observed. A lower depth of insertion was detected in patients with gastrointestinal surgery.
| S-EPMC10102144 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveEvaluation and management of small bowel disorders have always been challenging due to the limitations of the existing technology. Motorized power spiral enteroscopy (PSE) is an innovative new technique that offers easier, faster, and more complete small bowel evaluation with the ability to perform therapeutics. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PSE in various indications.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients, who underwent PSE at a tertiary care center. Primary outcome measures were technical success rate, pan-enteroscopy rate, diagnostic and therapeutic yield, and the secondary outcomes measures were the depth of maximal insertion, median insertion time, and adverse events.ResultsFifty-four patients (mean age of 49.38 ± 16.26 years) underwent PSE for small bowel evaluation. Technical success rate was 95.55% (antegrade route) and 93.10% (retrograde route). Pan-enteroscopy rate is 46.29% and antegrade enteroscopy to the cecum was achieved in eight patients. Overall diagnostic and therapeutic yields were 85.18% and 30.76%, respectively. The most common findings were ulcero-stricturing lesions (51.92%) followed by vascular lesions (9.61%). The most common histopathologic diagnosis was Crohn's disease in 29.62%. Median depth of maximal insertion was 400 cm (range 150-550 cm; antegrade route) and 180 cm (range 50-350 cm; retrograde route). The median insertion time to depth of maximal insertion was 70 min (range 30-110 min; antegrade route) and 45 min (range 20-70 min; retrograde route). PSE-associated major adverse events occurred in one patient and minor adverse events were seen in 48.14%.ConclusionPSE is a safe and effective modality for the evaluation of small bowel disorders with a high diagnostic yield.
| S-EPMC9307745 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video Video 1 EUS-directed transenteric ERCP–assisted internalization of percutaneous biliary drain in Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy anatomy.
| S-EPMC9552021 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8058107 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6098813 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video 1EUS-directed transgastric ERCP in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass revision of sleeve gastrectomy.
| S-EPMC9264139 | biostudies-literature