Dataset Information

Minimizing contrast media dose in CT pulmonary angiography with high-pitch technique.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To perform CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using a minimal amount of iodinated contrast media.

Methods

47 patients (25 females) with mean age 69 years (range 41-82 years) referred for contrast-enhanced chest CT were prospectively included in this Phase IV clinical drug trial. All participants underwent a study specific CTPA in addition to the chest CT. The participants received 80 mg I/kg body weight Iohexol contrast media using a preparatory saline bolus, a dual flow contrast/saline bolus and a saline flush, and a scanner protocol with 80 kVp dual source high-pitch mode. Three readers independently assessed the image quality on the 3-point scale non-diagnostic, adequate or good-excellent image quality. Additionally, the pulmonary arterial contrast opacification was measured.

Results

On average, the patients received 16.8 ml Iohexol 350 mg I/mL (range 12-20 ml). Mean patient weight was 71 kg (range 50-85 kg). Identically for all readers, pulmonary embolism (PE) was detected in 1/47 participants. The median number of examinations visually scored concerning pulmonary embolism as good-excellent was 47/47 (range 44-47); adequate 0/47 (0-3) and non-diagnostic 0/47 (range 0-0). The proportion adequate or better examinations was for all readers 47/47, 100% [95% confidence interval 92-100%]. The mean attenuation ± standard deviation in the pulmonary trunk was 325 ± 72 Hounsfield unit (range 165-531 Hounsfield unit).

Conclusions

Diagnostic CTPA with 17 ml contrast media is possible in non-obese patients using low kVp, high pitch and carefully designed contrast media administration.

Advances in knowledge

By combining several procedures in a CTPA protocol, the contrast media dose can be minimized.

SUBMITTER: Alobeidi H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7336071 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThe objective was to retrospectively develop a protocol in swine for optimal contrast media timing in coronary CT angiography (CCTA).MethodsSeveral dynamic acquisitions were performed in 28 swine (55 ± 24 kg) with cardiac outputs between 1.5 and 5.5 L/min, for 80 total acquisitions. The contrast was injected (1mL/kg, 5mL/s, Isovue 370), followed by dynamic scanning of the entire aortic enhancement curve, from which the true peak time and aortic and coronary enhancements were recorded as the reference standard. Each dataset was then used to simulate two different CCTA protocols-a new optimal protocol and a standard clinical protocol. For the optimal protocol, the CCTA was acquired after bolus tracking-based trigging using a variable time delay of one-half the contrast injection time interval plus 1.5 s. For the standard protocol, the CCTA was acquired after bolus tracking-based triggering using a fixed time delay of 5 s. For both protocols, the CCTA time, aortic enhancement, coronary enhancement, and coronary contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively compared to the reference standard measurements.ResultsFor the optimal protocol, the angiogram was acquired within -0.15 ± 0.75 s of the true peak time, for a mean coronary CNR within 7% of the peak coronary CNR. Conversely, for the standard CCTA protocol, the angiogram was acquired within -1.82 ± 1.71 s of the true peak time, for a mean coronary CNR that was 23% lower than the peak coronary CNR.ConclusionsThe optimal CCTA protocol improves contrast media timing and coronary CNR by acquiring the angiogram at the true aortic root peak time.Key points• This study in swine retrospectively developed the mathematical basis of an improved approach for optimal contrast media timing in CCTA. • By combining dynamic bolus tracking with a simple contrast injection timing relation, CCTA can be acquired at the peak of the aortic root enhancement. • CCTA acquisition at the peak of the aortic root enhancement should maximize the coronary enhancement and CNR, potentially improving the accuracy of CT-based assessment of coronary artery disease.

Project description:PURPOSE:Objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the iterative reconstruction of high-pitch dual-source chest CT (IR-HP-CT) scanned with low radiation exposure compared with low dose chest CT (LDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This study was approved by the institutional review board. Thirty healthy adult volunteers (mean age 44 years) were enrolled in this study. All volunteers underwent both IR-HP-CT and LDCT. IR-HP-CT was scanned with 120 kVp tube voltage, 30 mAs tube current and pitch 3.2 and reconstructed with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction. LDCT was scanned with 120 kVp tube voltage, 40 mAs tube current and pitch 0.8 and reconstructed with B50 filtered back projection. Image noise, and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the infraspinatus muscle, subcutaneous fat and lung parenchyma were calculated. Cardiac motion artifact, overall image quality and artifacts was rated by two blinded readers using 4-point scale. The dose-length product (DLP) (mGy?cm) were obtained from each CT dosimetry table. Scan length was calculated from the DLP results. The DLP parameter was a metric of radiation output, not of patient dose. Size-specific dose estimation (SSDE, mGy) was calculated using the sum of the anteroposterior and lateral dimensions and effective radiation dose (ED, mSv) were calculated using CT dosimetry index. RESULTS:Approximately, mean 40% of SSDE (2.1 ± 0.2 mGy vs. 3.5 ± 0.3 mGy) and 34% of ED (1.0 ± 0.1 mSv vs. 1.5 ± 0.1 mSv) was reduced in IR-HP-CT compared to LDCT (P < 0.0001). Image noise was reduced in the IR-HP-CT (16.8 ± 2.8 vs. 19.8 ± 3.4, P = 0.0001). SNR of lung and aorta of IR-HP-CT showed better results compared with that of LDCT (22.2 ± 5.9 vs. 33.0 ± 7.8, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001). The score of cardiac pulsation artifacts were significantly reduced on IR-HP-CT (3.8 ± 0.4, 95% confidence interval, 3.7?4.0) compared with LDCT (1.6 ± 0.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.3?1.8) (P < 0.0001). SNR of muscle and fat, beam hardening artifact and overall subjective image quality of the mediastinum, lung and chest wall were comparable on both scans (P ? 0.05). CONCLUSION:IR-HP-CT with 120 kVp and 30 mAs tube setting in addition to an iterative reconstruction reduced cardiac motion artifact and radiation exposure while representing similar image quality compared with LDCT.