Unknown

Dataset Information

0

One-year efficacy and safety of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:This study sought to compare clinical outcomes between bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) and durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stents (DP-EES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS:From March 2016 to October 2017, 952 patients with AMI without cardiogenic shock undergoing successful PCI with BRS (n = 136) or DP-EES (n = 816) were enrolled from a multicenter, observational Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. RESULTS:In the crude population, there was no significant difference in the 1-year rate of device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) and device thrombosis between the BRS and DP-EES groups (2.2% vs. 4.8%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-1.41, p = 0.163; 0.7% vs. 0.5%, HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.16-13.4, p = 0.719, respectively). BRS implantation was opted in younger patients (53.7 vs. 62.6 years, p < 0.001) with low-risk profiles, and intravascular image-guided PCI was more preferred in the BRS group (60.3% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:At 1-year follow-up, no differences in the rate of DOCE and device thrombosis were observed between patients with AMI treated with BRS and those treated with DP-EES. Our data suggest that imaging-guided BRS implantation in young patients with low risk profiles could be a reasonable strategy in the setting of AMI.

SUBMITTER: Kim Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7347113 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

One-year efficacy and safety of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Kim Yongcheol Y   Bae SungA S   Jeong Myung Ho MH   Ahn Youngkeun Y   Kim Chong Jin CJ   Cho Myeong Chan MC   Baumbach Andreas A   Gogas Bill D BD   King Spencer B SB  

PloS one 20200709 7


<h4>Background and objectives</h4>This study sought to compare clinical outcomes between bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) and durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stents (DP-EES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).<h4>Methods</h4>From March 2016 to October 2017, 952 patients with AMI without cardiogenic shock undergoing successful PCI with BRS (n = 136) or DP-EES (n = 816) were enrolled from a multicenter, observa  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4712350 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9075308 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3926690 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6617525 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5445242 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4998692 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6490733 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6188977 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9292184 | biostudies-literature