Dataset Information

Semi-mechanistic modelling platform to assess cardiac contractility and haemodynamics in preclinical cardiovascular safety profiling of new molecular entities.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

Cardiovascular safety is one of the most frequent causes of safety-related attrition both preclinically and clinically. Preclinical cardiovascular safety is routinely assessed using dog telemetry monitoring key cardiovascular functions. The present research was to develop a semi-mechanistic modelling platform to simultaneously assess changes in contractility (dPdt_max ), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in preclinical studies.

Experimental approach

Data from dPdt_max , HR, preload (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP]) and MAP were available from dog telemetry studies after dosing with atenolol (n = 27), salbutamol (n = 5), L-N^G -nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME; n = 4), milrinone (n = 4), verapamil (n = 12), dofetilide (n = 8), flecainide (n = 4) and AZ001 (n = 14). Literature model for rat CV function was used for the structural population pharmacodynamic model development. LVEDP was evaluated as covariate to account for the effect of preload on dPdt_max .

Key results

The model was able to describe drug-induced changes in dPdt_max , HR and MAP for all drugs included in the developed framework adequately, by incorporating appropriate drug effects on dPdt_max , HR and/or total peripheral resistance. Consistent with the Starling's law, incorporation of LVEDP as a covariate on dPdt_max to correct for the preload effect was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusions and implications

The contractility and haemodynamics semi-mechanistic modelling platform accounts for diurnal variation, drug-induced changes and inter-animal variation. It can be used to hypothesize and evaluate pharmacological effects and provide a holistic cardiovascular safety profile for new drugs.

SUBMITTER: Venkatasubramanian R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7348097 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAbnormal left atrial (LA) function is a marker of cardiac dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcome, but is difficult to assess, and hence not, routinely quantified. We aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a fast method to measure long-axis LA strain and strain rate (SR) with standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) compared to conventional feature tracking (FT) derived longitudinal strain.MethodsWe studied 50 normal controls, 30 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 100 heart failure (HF) patients, including 40 with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 30 mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and 30 preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). LA longitudinal strain and SR parameters were derived by tracking the distance between the left atrioventricular junction and a user-defined point at the mid posterior LA wall on standard cine CMR two- and four-chamber views. LA performance was analyzed at three distinct cardiac phases: reservoir function (reservoir strain εs and strain rate SRs), conduit function (conduit strain εe and strain rate SRe) and booster pump function (booster strain εa and strain rate SRa).ResultsThere was good agreement between LA longitudinal strain and SR assessed using the fast and conventional FT-CMR approaches (r = 0.89 to 0.99, p < 0.001). The fast strain and SRs showed a better intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and a 55% reduction in evaluation time (85 ± 10 vs. 190 ± 12 s, p < 0.001) compared to FT-CMR. Fast LA measurements in normal controls were 35.3 ± 5.2% for εs, 18.1 ± 4.3% for εe, 17.2 ± 3.5% for εa, and 1.8 ± 0.4, - 2.0 ± 0.5, - 2.3 ± 0.6 s- 1 for the respective phasic SRs. Significantly reduced LA strains and SRs were observed in all patient groups compared to normal controls. Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF had significantly smaller εs, SRs, εe and SRe than hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and HFmrEF had significantly impaired LA reservoir and booster function compared to HFpEF. The fast LA strains and SRs were similar to FT-CMR for discriminating patients from controls (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.79 to 0.96 vs. 0.76 to 0.93, p = NS).ConclusionsNovel quantitative LA strain and SR derived from conventional cine CMR images are fast assessable parameters for LA phasic function analysis.