Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Merit of an Ursodeoxycholic Acid Clinical Trial in COVID-19 Patients.

ABSTRACT: Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected over 8 million people worldwide. We underscore the potential benefits of conducting a randomized open-label unblinded clinical trial to evaluate the role of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of COVID-19. Some COVID-19 patients are characterized with cytokine storm syndrome that can cause severe and irreversible damage to organs leading to multi-organ failure and death. Therefore, it is critical to control both programmed cell death (apoptosis) and the hyper-immune inflammatory response in COVID-19 patients to reduce the rising morbidity and mortality. UDCA is an existing drug with proven safety profiles that can reduce inflammation and prevent cell death. National Geographic reported that, "China Promotes Bear Bile as Coronavirus Treatment". Bear bile is rich in UDCA, comprising up to 40-50% of the total bile acid. UDCA is a logical and attainable replacement for bear bile that is available in pill form and merits clinical trial consideration.

SUBMITTER: Subramanian S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7350268 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Merit of an Ursodeoxycholic Acid Clinical Trial in COVID-19 Patients.

Subramanian Subbaya S Iles Tinen T Ikramuddin Sayeed S Steer Clifford J CJ

Vaccines 20200619 2

Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected over 8 million people worldwide. We underscore the potential benefits of conducting a randomized open-label unblinded clinical trial to evaluate the role of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of COVID-19. Some COVID-19 patients are characterized with cytokine storm syndrome that can cause severe and irreversible damage to organs leading to multi-organ failure and death. Therefore, it is critical to control both programmed cell death (ap ...[more]

PMID: 32575350

Similar Datasets

Clinical Study of Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Barrett's Esophagus Patients.

Project description:Prior research strongly implicates gastric acid and bile acids, two major components of the gastroesophageal refluxate, in the development of Barrett's esophagus and its pathogenesis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hydrophilic bile acid, has been shown to protect esophageal cells against oxidative stress induced by cytotoxic bile acids. We conducted a pilot clinical study to evaluate the clinical activity of UDCA in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Twenty-nine patients with Barrett's esophagus received UDCA treatment at a daily dose of 13 to 15 mg/kg/day for 6 months. The clinical activity of UDCA was assessed by evaluating changes in gastric bile acid composition and markers of oxidative DNA damage (8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine), cell proliferation (Ki67), and apoptosis (cleaved caspase-3) in Barrett's esophagus epithelium. The bile acid concentrations in gastric fluid were measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. At baseline, UDCA (sum of unchanged and glycine/taurine conjugates) accounted for 18.2% of total gastric bile acids. After UDCA intervention, UDCA increased significantly to account for 93.4% of total gastric bile acids (P < 0.0001). The expression of markers of oxidative DNA damage, cell proliferation, and apoptosis was assessed in the Barrett's esophagus biopsies by IHC. The selected tissue biomarkers were unchanged after 6 months of UDCA intervention. We conclude that high-dose UDCA supplementation for 6 months resulted in favorable changes in gastric bile acid composition but did not modulate selected markers of oxidative DNA damage, cell proliferation, and apoptosis in the Barrett's esophagus epithelium. Cancer Prev Res; 9(7); 528-33. ©2016 AACRSee related article by Brian J. Reid, p. 512.

| S-EPMC4930711 | biostudies-literature

Patients' Attitudes to Unproven Therapies in Treating COVID-19 Merit Evaluation.

Project description:Since the outbreak of COVID-19, many randomized controlled trials have been launched to test the efficacy of promising treatments. These trials will offer great promise for future treatment. However, a public health emergency calls for a balance between gathering sound evidence and granting therapeutic access to promising trial drugs as widely as possible. In an electronic survey, we found that 3.9% of the participants preferred to receive an unproven trial drug directly in the hypothetical scenario of mild COVID-19 infection. This percentage increased drastically to 31.1% and 54.2% in the hypothetical scenario of severe and extremely severe infection, respectively. Our survey indicates a likelihood of substantial receptivity of trial drugs among actual patients in severe conditions. From the perspective of deontological ethics, a trial can only be approved when potential benefits of the investigational treatment are presumed to outweigh risks, so compassionate or off-label use of investigational therapies merits evaluation.

| S-EPMC7836536 | biostudies-literature

Proteomic blood profiling in mild, severe and critical COVID-19 patients

Project description: Not available

| S-BSST416 | biostudies-other

Immunologic characterization of COVID-19 patients with hematologic cancer: biologic and clinical significance

Project description:Immunosuppression caused by cancer itself and cytotoxic treatment may pose a challenge to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with hematological malignancies. Here, we use multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC) to analyze immune profiles in peripheral blood samples of 515 COVID-19 patients at presentation. In 14 cases, deep immunophenotyping of B- and T-cells was performed and six myeloid- and dendritic-cell subsets were FACSorted for transcriptome analysis using RNAseq. Of the 515 patients, 15 and 10 had solid and hematological tumors, respectively. Those with hematological cancer showed significantly higher rates of intensive care (50%) and death (30%) from COVID-19 vs cases with solid cancer and no tumor. Patients with hematological malignancies displayed altered immune profiles with significantly decreased absolute numbers of several subsets of myeloid and lymphoid cells. Myeloid- and dendritic-cell types from hematological cases showed differentially expression of genes coding transcription factors, toll-like receptors and proinflammatory interleukin receptors implicated in response to coronaviruses. The relative distribution of the B-cell compartment was notoriously altered in COVID-19 patients with hematological cancer, and progressively lower numbers of B- and T-cell subsets were observed in deceased cases. Altogether, our results suggest an association between impaired immune responses and poorer outcomes in COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies.

2020-12-31 | GSE153610 | GEO

Clinical Trial of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Outpatients (C3PO)

Project description:Clinical Trial of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Outpatients (C3PO)

| PRJNA791978 | ENA

Clinical Trial of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Outpatients (C3PO)

Project description:Clinical Trial of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Outpatients (C3PO)

| PRJNA791979 | ENA

Host transcriptomic profiling of COVID-19 patients with mild, moderate, and severe clinical outcomes

Project description:We perform shotgun transcriptome sequencing of human RNA obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs of patients with COVID-19, and identify a molecular signature associated with disease severity

2020-12-19 | GSE162835 | GEO

Proximal Tubular Dysfunction as a Predictor of AKI in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

Project description: Not available

| S-BSST1269 | biostudies-other

A large-scale, multicentre, double-blind trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Project description:Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin has improved chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) therapy; however, sustained virological response is achieved in only about half of the patients with a 1b genotype infection. We assessed oral ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on serum biomarkers as a possible treatment for interferon non-responders.CH-C patients with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were assigned randomly to 150 (n = 199), 600 (n = 200) or 900 mg/day (n = 197) UDCA intake for 24 weeks. Changes in ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) were assessed. This study is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov, identifier NCT00200343.ALT, AST and GGT decreased at week 4 and then remained constant during drug administration. The median changes (150, 600 and 900 mg/day, respectively) were: ALT, -15.3, -29.2 and -36.2%; AST, -13.6, -25.0 and -29.8%; GGT, -22.4, -41.0 and -50.0%. These biomarkers decreased significantly less in the 150 mg/day than in the other two groups. Although changes in ALT and AST did not differ between the 600 and 900 mg/day groups, GGT was significantly lower in the 900 mg/day group. In subgroup analysis, ALT decreased significantly in the 900 mg/day group when the baseline GGT exceeded 80 IU/l. Serum HCV-RNA did not change in any group. Adverse effects were reported by 19.1% of the patients, with no differences between groups.A 600 mg/day UDCA dose was optimal to decrease ALT and AST levels in CH-C patients. The 900 mg/day dose decreased GGT levels further, and may be preferable in patients with prevailing biliary injuries.

| S-EPMC2095694 | biostudies-literature

Gender modifies the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in a randomized controlled trial in colorectal adenoma patients.

Project description:Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was one of the earliest agents investigated as a drug for colorectal cancer prevention. However, UDCA failed to show efficacy to prevent the development of colorectal adenomas in a large, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. We re-evaluated the effect of UDCA in men and women separately, based on sex-specific differences in bile acid metabolism and suspected variation in etiologic factors contributing to colorectal cancer risk.We conducted a secondary analysis of the efficacy of UDCA to prevent colorectal adenoma in men (n = 804) and women (n = 388).We found no reduction in risk of any metachronous adenoma with UDCA treatment in men or women. However, UDCA treatment significantly lowered the odds of advanced lesions [odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.89] in men, but not women. We also observed significantly higher odds of advanced lesions with UDCA treatment in women who were younger (age, <65 years; OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.10-9.56), obese (body mass index, > or = 30 kg/m(2); OR, 5.45; 95% CI, 1.42-20.9), or in the highest tertile of total dietary fat (> or = 56.2 g/day; OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.35-8.95). In a multivariate model, the interactive effect of fat intake accounted for the modulating effects of age and body mass index in women.Our findings support the use of UDCA for preventing advanced colorectal adenomas in men. The increased odds of adenoma among women with high fat intake suggest a previously unrecognized harm that warrants further study, especially given the chronic exposure to UDCA in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and the increasing investigational use of UDCA for several other conditions.

| S-EPMC4120755 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data