Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Value of laboratory results in addition to vital signs in a machine learning algorithm to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest: A single-center retrospective cohort study.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Although machine learning-based prediction models for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been widely investigated, it is unknown whether a model based on vital signs alone (Vitals-Only model) can perform similarly to a model that considers both vital signs and laboratory results (Vitals+Labs model). METHODS:All adult patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital in Japan between October 2011 and October 2018 were included in this study. Random forest models with/without laboratory results (Vitals+Labs model and Vitals-Only model, respectively) were trained and tested using chronologically divided datasets. Both models use patient demographics and eight-hourly vital signs collected within the previous 48 hours. The primary and secondary outcomes were the occurrence of IHCA in the next 8 and 24 hours, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as a comparative measure. Sensitivity analyses were performed under multiple statistical assumptions. RESULTS:Of 141,111 admitted patients (training data: 83,064, test data: 58,047), 338 had an IHCA (training data: 217, test data: 121) during the study period. The Vitals-Only model and Vitals+Labs model performed comparably when predicting IHCA within the next 8 hours (Vitals-Only model vs Vitals+Labs model, AUC = 0.862 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.855-0.868] vs 0.872 [95% CI: 0.867-0.878]) and 24 hours (Vitals-Only model vs Vitals+Labs model, AUC = 0.830 [95% CI: 0.825-0.835] vs 0.837 [95% CI: 0.830-0.844]). Both models performed similarly well on medical, surgical, and ward patient data, but did not perform well for intensive care unit patients. CONCLUSIONS:In this single-center study, the machine learning model predicted IHCAs with good discrimination. The addition of laboratory values to vital signs did not significantly improve its overall performance.

SUBMITTER: Ueno R 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7357766 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Value of laboratory results in addition to vital signs in a machine learning algorithm to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Ueno Ryo R   Xu Liyuan L   Uegami Wataru W   Matsui Hiroki H   Okui Jun J   Hayashi Hiroshi H   Miyajima Toru T   Hayashi Yoshiro Y   Pilcher David D   Jones Daryl D  

PloS one 20200713 7


<h4>Background</h4>Although machine learning-based prediction models for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been widely investigated, it is unknown whether a model based on vital signs alone (Vitals-Only model) can perform similarly to a model that considers both vital signs and laboratory results (Vitals+Labs model).<h4>Methods</h4>All adult patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital in Japan between October 2011 and October 2018 were included in this study. Random forest models with  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8761796 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6556419 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4715919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8023684 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10982524 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4899064 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6925691 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9758227 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7105633 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5935002 | biostudies-other