Feasibility of postural lung recruitment maneuver in children: a randomized, controlled study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Pulmonary atelectasis in anesthetized children is easily reverted by lung recruitment maneuvers. However, the high airways pressure reached during the maneuver could negatively affect hemodynamics. The aim of this study is to assess the effect and feasibility of a postural lung recruitment maneuver (P-RM); i.e., a new maneuver that opens up the atelectatic lung areas based on changing the child's body position under constant ventilation with moderated driving pressure (12 cmH2O) and of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, 10 cmH2O). Forty ASA I-II children, aged 6 months to 7 years, subjected to general anesthesia were studied. Patients were ventilated with volume control mode using standard settings with 5 cmH2O of PEEP. They were randomized into two groups: (1) control group (C group, n?=?20)-ventilation was turned to pressure control ventilation using a fixed driving pressure of 12 cmH2O. PEEP was increased from 5 to 10 cmH2O during 3 min maintaining the supine position. (2) P-RM group (n?=?20)-patients received the same increase in driving pressure and PEEP, but they were placed, respectively, in the left lateral position, in the right lateral position (90 s each), and back again into the supine position after 3 min. Then, ventilation returned to baseline settings in volume control mode. Lung ultrasound-derived aeration score and respiratory compliance were assessed before (T1) and after (T2) 10 cmH2O of PEEP was applied. RESULTS:At baseline ventilation (T1), both groups showed similar aeration score (P-RM group 9.9?±?1.9 vs C group 10.4?±?1.9; p?=?0.463) and respiratory compliance (P-RM group 15?±?6 vs C group 14?±?6 mL/cmH2O; p?=?0.517). At T2, the aeration score decreased in the P-RM group (1.5?±?1.6 vs 9.9?±?2.1; p?
SUBMITTER: Acosta CM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7359212 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA