Dataset Information

A Phase 1, Open-Label Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate the Absolute Bioavailability of AG-221 by a Microtracer Approach.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the absolute bioavailability (BA) of AG-221 following a single oral dose of 100 mg AG-221 and an intravenous (IV) dose of ~ 100 μg AG-221 containing approximately 300 nCi of [¹⁴C]-AG-221.

Methods

This was a phase 1, open-label study. Six subjects who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. After an overnight fast of at least 10 h, the subjects received an oral dose (coated tablet) of 100 mg of AG-221 at 0 h on dosing day. Four hours after the oral dose, the subjects received 100 μg AG-221 containing ~ 300 nCi of [¹⁴C]-AG-221 administered as an IV bolus. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for plasma concentrations of AG-221 and [¹⁴C]-AG-221 using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation followed by accelerator mass spectrometry analysis (AMS), respectively. Safety was evaluated throughout the study.

Results

The absolute BA after a 100-mg oral dose of AG-221 was measured as 57.2%. While the total clearance was 1.37 L/h, ~ 1/60 of the liver blood flow in a typical 70-kg human subject, the first-pass extraction was estimated to be less than 2%, assuming that the total clearance was entirely due to liver metabolism. Thus, the fraction of the AG-221 dose absorbed was at least 50%. AG-221 was safe and well tolerated when given under fasted conditions in a single 100-mg dose as a coated tablet with a microtracer [¹⁴C]-AG-221 solution, as few drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. No clinically significant changes or findings were noted in the clinical laboratory evaluations, vital sign measurements, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed during this study.

Conclusions

In healthy subjects under fasting conditions, the absolute BA following oral administration of a 100-mg AG-221 tablet was 57.2%. AG-221 was safe and well tolerated in healthy male subjects when administered as a single 100-mg film-coated tablet plus 100 µg [¹⁴C]-AG-221 given intravenously.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02443168.

Funding

Celgene Corporation.

SUBMITTER: Wang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7360017 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:This open-label, fixed-sequence, phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction between maraviroc (MVC) and ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir (FPV/r) in healthy subjects. In period 1, subjects received 300 mg of MVC twice daily (BID; cohort 1) or once daily (QD; cohort 2) for 5 days. In period 2, cohort 1 subjects received 700/100 mg of FPV/r BID alone on days 1 to 10 and then FPV/r at 700/100 mg BID plus MVC at 300 mg BID on days 11 to 20; cohort 2 subjects received FPV/r at 1,400/100 mg QD alone on days 1 to 10 and then FPV/r at 1,400/100 mg QD plus MVC at 300 mg QD on days 11 to 20. Pharmacokinetic parameters, assessed on day 5 of period 1 and on days 10 and 20 of period 2, included the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the concentration at end of dosing interval (C?), and the area under the curve over dosing interval (AUC?). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. MVC geometric mean AUC?, Cmax, and C? were increased by 149, 52, and 374%, respectively, after BID dosing with FPV/r, and by 126, 45, and 80%, respectively, after QD dosing. Amprenavir (the active form of the prodrug fosamprenavir) and ritonavir exposures were decreased in the presence of MVC with amprenavir AUC?, Cmax, and C? decreased by 34 to 36% in the presence of FPV/r plus maraviroc BID and by 15 to 30% with FPV/r plus MVC QD both compared to FPV/r alone. The overall all-causality adverse-event (AE) incidence rate was 96.4%; all AEs were of mild or moderate severity. Commonly reported treatment-related AEs (>20% of patients overall) included diarrhea, fatigue, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea. No serious AEs or deaths occurred. In summary, maraviroc exposure increased in the presence of FPV/r, whereas MVC coadministration decreased amprenavir and ritonavir exposures. MVC dosed at 300 mg BID with FPV/r is not recommended due to concerns of lower amprenavir exposures; however, no dose adjustment is warranted with MVC at 150 mg BID in combination with FPV/r based on the available clinical data. MVC plus FPV/r was generally well tolerated; no new safety signals were detected.