Dataset Information

Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.

ABSTRACT: Low-cost air monitoring sensors are an appealing tool for assessing pollutants in environmental studies. Portable low-cost sensors hold promise to expand temporal and spatial coverage of air quality information. However, researchers have reported challenges in these sensors' operational quality. We evaluated the performance characteristics of two widely used sensors, the Plantower PMS A003 and Shinyei PPD42NS, for measuring fine particulate matter compared to reference methods, and developed regional calibration models for the Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Baltimore, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Winston-Salem and Seattle metropolitan areas. Duplicate Plantower PMS A003 sensors demonstrated a high level of precision (averaged Pearson's r = 0.99), and compared with regulatory instruments, showed good accuracy (cross-validated R² = 0.96, RMSE = 1.15 µg/m³ for daily averaged PM_2.5 estimates in the Seattle region). Shinyei PPD42NS sensor results had lower precision (Pearson's r = 0.84) and accuracy (cross-validated R² = 0.40, RMSE = 4.49 µg/m³). Region-specific Plantower PMS A003 models, calibrated with regulatory instruments and adjusted for temperature and relative humidity, demonstrated acceptable performance metrics for daily average measurements in the other six regions (R² = 0.74-0.95, RMSE = 2.46-0.84 µg/m³). Applying the Seattle model to the other regions resulted in decreased performance (R² = 0.67-0.84, RMSE = 3.41-1.67 µg/m³), likely due to differences in meteorological conditions and particle sources. We describean approach to metropolitan region-specific calibration models for low-cost sensors that can be used with cautionfor exposure measurement in epidemiological studies.

SUBMITTER: Zusman M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7363217 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.

Zusman Marina M Schumacher Cooper S CS Gassett Amanda J AJ Spalt Elizabeth W EW Austin Elena E Larson Timothy V TV Carvlin Graeme G Seto Edmund E Kaufman Joel D JD Sheppard Lianne L

Environment international 20191126

Low-cost air monitoring sensors are an appealing tool for assessing pollutants in environmental studies. Portable low-cost sensors hold promise to expand temporal and spatial coverage of air quality information. However, researchers have reported challenges in these sensors' operational quality. We evaluated the performance characteristics of two widely used sensors, the Plantower PMS A003 and Shinyei PPD42NS, for measuring fine particulate matter compared to reference methods, and developed reg ...[more]

PMID: 31783241

Similar Datasets

Project description:Low-cost sensors (LCS) are increasingly being used to measure fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in cities around the world. One of the most commonly deployed LCS is the PurpleAir with ~ 15,000 sensors deployed in the United States, alone. PurpleAir measurements are widely used by the public to evaluate PM2.5 levels in their neighborhoods. PurpleAir measurements are also increasingly being integrated into models by researchers to develop large-scale estimates of PM2.5. However, the change in sensor performance over time has not been well studied. It is important to understand the lifespan of these sensors to determine when they should be serviced or replaced, and when measurements from these devices should or should not be used for various applications. This paper fills this gap by leveraging the fact that: (1) Each PurpleAir sensor is comprised of two identical sensors and the divergence between their measurements can be observed, and (2) There are numerous PurpleAir sensors within 50 meters of regulatory monitors allowing for the comparison of measurements between these instruments. We propose empirically derived degradation outcomes for the PurpleAir sensors and evaluate how these outcomes change over time. On average, we find that the number of 'flagged' measurements, where the two sensors within each PurpleAir sensor disagree, increases with time to ~ 4% after 4 years of operation. Approximately 2 percent of all PurpleAir sensors were permanently degraded. The largest fraction of permanently degraded PurpleAir sensors appeared to be in the hot and humid climate zone, suggesting that sensors in these locations may need to be replaced more frequently. We also find that the bias of PurpleAir sensors, or the difference between corrected PM2.5 levels and the corresponding reference measurements, changed over time by -0.12 μg/m3(95% CI: -0.13 μg/m3, -0.10 μg/m3) per year. The average bias increases dramatically after 3.5 years. Further, climate zone is a significant modifier of the association between degradation outcomes and time.

Dataset Information

Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.

Publications

Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets