Dataset Information

Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Clinical free-text data (eg, outpatient letters or nursing notes) represent a vast, untapped source of rich information that, if more accessible for research, would clarify and supplement information coded in structured data fields. Data usually need to be deidentified or anonymized before they can be reused for research, but there is a lack of established guidelines to govern effective deidentification and use of free-text information and avoid damaging data utility as a by-product. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to develop recommendations for the creation of data governance standards to integrate with existing frameworks for personal data use, to enable free-text data to be used safely for research for patient and public benefit. METHODS:We outlined data protection legislation and regulations relating to the United Kingdom for context and conducted a rapid literature review and UK-based case studies to explore data governance models used in working with free-text data. We also engaged with stakeholders, including text-mining researchers and the general public, to explore perceived barriers and solutions in working with clinical free-text. RESULTS:We proposed a set of recommendations, including the need for authoritative guidance on data governance for the reuse of free-text data, to ensure public transparency in data flows and uses, to treat deidentified free-text data as potentially identifiable with use limited to accredited data safe havens, and to commit to a culture of continuous improvement to understand the relationships between the efficacy of deidentification and reidentification risks, so this can be communicated to all stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS:By drawing together the findings of a combination of activities, we present a position paper to contribute to the development of data governance standards for the reuse of clinical free-text data for secondary purposes. While working in accordance with existing data governance frameworks, there is a need for further work to take forward the recommendations we have proposed, with commitment and investment, to assure and expand the safe reuse of clinical free-text data for public benefit.

SUBMITTER: Jones KH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7367542 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper.

Jones Kerina H KH Ford Elizabeth M EM Lea Nathan N Griffiths Lucy J LJ Hassan Lamiece L Heys Sharon S Squires Emma E Nenadic Goran G

Journal of medical Internet research 20200629 6

<h4>Background</h4>Clinical free-text data (eg, outpatient letters or nursing notes) represent a vast, untapped source of rich information that, if more accessible for research, would clarify and supplement information coded in structured data fields. Data usually need to be deidentified or anonymized before they can be reused for research, but there is a lack of established guidelines to govern effective deidentification and use of free-text information and avoid damaging data utility as a by-p ...[more]

PMID: 32597785

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSince the national big data strategy was unveiled at the fifth plenary session of the 18th CPC (Communist Party of China) Central Committee, the big data industry has been flourishing in China. Various successful industrial data governance systems have emerged with the rapid development of big data technologies and data management theories. City Brain and Enterprise Data Middle Platform are considered the best data governance systems in urban and corporate governance, respectively. However, in the health and medical sectors, issues of data operation occur frequently due to a lack of systematic data governance. These problems need to be urgently addressed, as health and medical data have been defined as national fundamental strategic resources. Clinical researchers have an increasing demand for data analysis.MethodsTherefore, the Medical Data Governance System (MDGS) has been designed to improve data quality and provide simple and convenient data analysis tools for the National Clinical Research Center for Child Health. The MDGS consists of the Medical Data Platform (MDP) and Operation Management System (OMS). The MDP comprises acquisition layer, middle platform, and application layer that persistently elevates data quality and significantly shortens data analysis duration. Organization construction, management regulations, and technical standards are included in the OMS, which guarantees the sustainable operation of the MDGS. The MDGS was established to advance state-of-the-art and state-of-practice data governance for the health and medical sectors in China.ResultsWith the first phase of the MDGS, the quantity and quality of research projects increase, research transformation speeds up, and the researchers' job satisfaction increased.ConclusionsBased on our preliminary achievements, it was necessary and feasible to establish the MDGS. It is important to have comprehensive requirement study, top-level design, refined planning, phase-by-phase implementation, and continual optimization.

Project description:BackgroundGrowing interest in public involvement in health research has led to organisational and policy change. Additionally, an emerging body of policy-oriented scholarship has begun to identify the organisational and network arrangements that shape public involvement activity. Such developments suggest the need to clearly conceptualise and characterise public involvement in health research in terms of governance.MethodsWe drew on an established health research system framework to analyse governance functions related to public involvement, adapting scoping review methods to identify evidence from a corpus of journal papers and policy reports. We drew on the logics of aggregation and top down configuration, using a qualitative interpretive approach to combine and link findings from different studies into framework categories.ResultsWe identified a total of 32 scholarly papers and 13 policy reports (n =?45 included papers) with relevance to governance for public involvement. Included papers were broadly consonant in identifying the need for activity to specify and support public involvement across all four governance functions of stewardship, financing, creating and sustaining resources, and research production and use. However, different visions for public involvement, and the activity required to implement it and achieve impact, were particularly evident with respect to the stewardship function, which seeks to set overall directions for research while addressing the potentially competing demands of a system's many constituents.ConclusionsA governance perspective has considerable value for public involvement in health research systems, supporting efforts to coordinate and institutionalise the burgeoning public involvement enterprise. Furthermore, it highlights challenges for what is, ultimately, a highly political intervention, suggesting that diverse publics must be both involved within health research systems and enrolled as governors of them.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Health research has scientific, social and political impacts. To achieve such impacts, several institutions need to participate; however, health research funding institutions are seldom nominated in the literature as essential players. The attention they have received has so far focused mainly on their role in knowledge translation, informing policy-making and the need to organise health research systems. In this article, we will focus solely on the governance of national health research funding institutions. Our objectives are to identify the main functions of governance for such institutions and actionable governance functions. This research should be useful in several ways, including in highlighting, tracking and measuring the governance trends in a given funding institution, and to forestall low-level governance. METHODS:First, we reviewed existing frameworks in the grey literature, selecting seven relevant documents. Second, we developed an integrated framework for health research funding institution governance and management. Third, we extracted actionable information for governance by selecting a mix of North American, European and Asian institutions that had documentation available in English (e.g. annual report, legal status, strategy). RESULTS:The framework contains 13 functions - 5 dedicated to governance (intelligence acquisition, resourcing and instrumentation, relationships management, accountability and performance, and strategy formulation), 3 dedicated to management (priority-setting, financing and knowledge transfer), and 5 dedicated to transversal logics that apply to both governance and management (ethics, transparency, capacity reinforcement, monitoring and evaluation, and public engagement). CONCLUSIONS:Herein, we provide a conceptual contribution for scholars in the field of governance and health research as well as a practical contribution, with actionable functions for high-level managers in charge of the governance of health research funding institutions.

Project description:BackgroundSocial and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) are environmental and behavioral factors that often impede disease management and result in sexually transmitted infections. Despite their importance, SBDH are inconsistently documented in electronic health records (EHRs) and typically collected only in an unstructured format. Evidence suggests that structured data elements present in EHRs can contribute further to identify SBDH in the patient record.ObjectiveExplore the automated inference of both the presence of SBDH documentation and individual SBDH risk factors in patient records. Compare the relative ability of clinical notes and structured EHR data, such as laboratory measurements and diagnoses, to support inference.MethodsWe attempt to infer the presence of SBDH documentation in patient records, as well as patient status of 11 SBDH, including alcohol abuse, homelessness, and sexual orientation. We compare classification performance when considering clinical notes only, structured data only, and notes and structured data together. We perform an error analysis across several SBDH risk factors.ResultsClassification models inferring the presence of SBDH documentation achieved good performance (F1 score: 92.7-78.7; F1 considered as the primary evaluation metric). Performance was variable for models inferring patient SBDH risk status; results ranged from F1?=?82.7 for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) status to F1?=?28.5 for intravenous drug use. Error analysis demonstrated that lexical diversity and documentation of historical SBDH status challenge inference of patient SBDH status. Three of five classifiers inferring topic-specific SBDH documentation and 10 of 11 patient SBDH status classifiers achieved highest performance when trained using both clinical notes and structured data.ConclusionOur findings suggest that combining clinical free-text notes and structured data provide the best approach in classifying patient SBDH status. Inferring patient SBDH status is most challenging among SBDH with low prevalence and high lexical diversity.

Dataset Information

Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper.

Publications

Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets