Unknown

Dataset Information

0

On the evolution of sexual receptivity in female primates.


ABSTRACT: There has been much interest in the evolutionary forces responsible for, and underlying the diversity in, female primate reproductive cycles. While there has been limited research on sexual receptivity in primates, this has been one recurring topic of interest. Some primate species are like humans, sexually receptive to mating throughout their entire estrus cycle, while other species are the opposite, receptive for mere hours out of their several-week cycles. Why is there such prominent variation in sexual receptivity length among primate species? Here we examine the evolutionary trade-offs associated with sexual receptivity length using mathematical modeling. We investigate how various factors, including having ovulation signs present versus concealed ovulation, female physiological costs, and group size, each influence the length of females' receptive periods. We find that both continuous receptivity and very short lengths of receptivity are able to evolve. Our model predicts that increasing the impacts of infanticide will increase the length of the female receptive period, emphasizing the possible importance of paternity confusion. Similar effects can also be achieved by increasing the non-genetic benefits provided by males. Overall, our work offers a theoretical framework for understanding the evolution and diversity of mating traits in female primates.

SUBMITTER: Rooker K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7371874 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

On the evolution of sexual receptivity in female primates.

Rooker Kelly K   Gavrilets Sergey S  

Scientific reports 20200720 1


There has been much interest in the evolutionary forces responsible for, and underlying the diversity in, female primate reproductive cycles. While there has been limited research on sexual receptivity in primates, this has been one recurring topic of interest. Some primate species are like humans, sexually receptive to mating throughout their entire estrus cycle, while other species are the opposite, receptive for mere hours out of their several-week cycles. Why is there such prominent variatio  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3674241 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9672162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9045819 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6684226 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9649691 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3085923 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5204150 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1762360 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2904398 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5998091 | biostudies-literature