Dataset Information

Patient-specific reference values for objective physical function tests: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to establish sex-specific reference values of objective physical function tests among individuals with or at risk for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) across subsets of age, radiographic KOA severity, and body mass index (BMI). METHOD:We included Osteoarthritis Initiative participants with data for objective physical function tests, sex, age, BMI, and radiographic KOA severity (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade) at baseline. Objective physical function was quantified with 20-m walk speed, chair-stand speed, 400-m walk time, and knee extension and flexion strength. We created participant characteristic subsets for sex, age, KL grade, and BMI. Reference values were created as percentiles from minimum to maximum in 10% increments for each combination of participant characteristic subsets. Previously established clinically important differences for 20-m walk speed and knee extension strength were used to highlight clinically relevant differences. RESULTS:Objective physical function reference values tables and an interactive reference value table were created across all combinations of sex, age, KL grade, and BMI among 3860 individuals with or at risk for KOA. Clinically relevant differences exist for 20-m walk speed and knee extension strength between males and females across age groups, KL grades, and BMI categories. CONCLUSIONS:Establishing an individual's relative level of objective physical function by comparing their performance to individuals with similar sex, age, KL grade, or BMI may help improve interpretation of physical function performance. The interactive reference value table will provide clinicians and researchers a clinically accessible avenue to use these reference values.Key Points• Since greater age, radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity, and body mass index are all associated with worse objective physical function, reference values should consider the complex inter-play among these patient characteristics.• This study provides objective physical function reference values among subsets of individuals across the spectrum of sex, age groups, radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity, and body mass index categories.• These reference values offer a more patient-centered approach for interpreting an individual's relative level of objective physical function by comparing them to a more homogeneous group of individuals with similar participant characteristics.• We have provided a clinically accessible interactive table that will enable clinicians and researchers to input their patient's data to quickly and efficiently determine a patient's relative objective physical function compared to individual's with similar characteristics.

SUBMITTER: Harkey MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7372536 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient-specific reference values for objective physical function tests: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Harkey Matthew S MS Price Lori Lyn LL Reid Kieran F KF Lo Grace H GH Liu Shao-Hsien SH Lapane Kate L KL Dantas Lucas Ogura LO McAlindon Timothy E TE Driban Jeffrey B JB

Clinical rheumatology 20200206 6

<h4>Introduction/objective</h4>We aimed to establish sex-specific reference values of objective physical function tests among individuals with or at risk for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) across subsets of age, radiographic KOA severity, and body mass index (BMI).<h4>Method</h4>We included Osteoarthritis Initiative participants with data for objective physical function tests, sex, age, BMI, and radiographic KOA severity (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade) at baseline. Objective physical function was quan ...[more]

PMID: 32030634

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Prior concussion studies have shown that objective neurophysiological measures are sensitive to detecting concussive and subconcussive impairments in youth ice-hockey. These studies monitored brain vital signs at rink-side using a within-subjects design to demonstrate significant changes from pre-season baseline scans. However, practical clinical implementation must overcome inherent challenges related to any dependence on a baseline. This requires establishing the start of normative reference data sets. Methods: The current study collected specific reference data for N = 58 elite, youth, male ice-hockey players and compared these with a general reference dataset from N = 135 of males and females across the lifespan. The elite hockey players were recruited to a select training camp through CAA Hockey, a management agency for players drafted to leagues such as the National Hockey League (NHL). The statistical analysis included a test-retest comparison to establish reliability, and a multivariate analysis of covariance to evaluate differences in brain vital signs between groups with age as a covariate. Findings: Test-retest assessments for brain vital signs evoked potentials showed moderate-to-good reliability (Cronbach's Alpha > 0.7, Intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.5) in five out of six measures. The multivariate analysis of covariance showed no overall effect for group (p = 0.105), and a significant effect of age as a covariate was observed (p < 0.001). Adjusting for the effect of age, a significant difference was observed in the measure of N100 latency (p = 0.022) between elite hockey players and the heterogeneous control group. Interpretation: The findings support the concept that normative physiological data can be used in brain vital signs evaluation in athletes, and should additionally be stratified for age, skill level, and experience. These can be combined with general norms and/or individual baseline assessments where appropriate and/or possible. The current results allow for brain vital sign evaluation independent of baseline assessment, therefore enabling objective neurophysiological evaluation of concussion management and cognitive performance optimization in ice-hockey.

Project description:BackgroundGood hearing is a fundamental skill that allows children to develop properly, both socially and intellectually. In contrast to defects in inner ear function, however, auditory processing disorders (APDs)-which can affect up to 2-3% of school-children-are not easily identified with basic screening programs and must be diagnosed using special tests. Although such psychoacoustic tests are available, the scores achieved depend highly on the social, cultural, and linguistic characteristics of the population, and norms must be established for each population separately. Reference values are still lacking for the Polish population, especially for children in school-age, so that practitioners must interpret test scores themselves, often intuitively or using potentially biased thresholds from other countries.Materials and methodsWe investigated a sample of 94 Polish schoolchildren with normal hearing, divided into four age groups: from 7 years-olds to 10 years-olds. All children had no speech or language development disorder, learning problem, or symptom of APD. Participants were volunteers who had previously taken part in a large screening study. The group consisted of 56 girls (60%) and 38 boys (40%) with an average age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.1). The test battery included the Duration Pattern Test (DPT), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), Time-Compressed Speech Test (CST), and Dichotic Digit Test (DDT).ResultsThe scores on all tests increased consistently with age. The difference between each age-group for DPT, CST, and left- and right-ear DDT tests was significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p-values = 0.002, 0.006, 0.005, 0.020, respectively), but the effect of age on the FPT test was not (p-value = 0.143). The analysis showed a clear and significant separation between a merged group of ages 7 and 8 and another of ages 9 and 10. We, therefore, propose, for each test, separate reference values for these two particular age-groups. Using thresholds based on a 10% quantile, we offer the following reference values for ages 7-8 and 9-10 respectively: DPT, 28.5% and 53.8%; FPT, 18.5% and 27.5%; CST, 68.6% and 77.2%; left-ear DDT, 34.3% and 52.5%; right-ear DDT, 56% and 72.5%.ConclusionThe scores on psychoacoustic tests to diagnose APD differ between cultures and linguistic backgrounds. Clinicians should, therefore, use norms that have been designed for the population most similar to their patients. Here, we report the use of a test battery designed for the Polish language that accounts for various aspects of APD when screening school children. Together with a full methodology of those tests, we provide norms that can be used as cut-offs in clinical diagnosis. Practitioners are invited to use them to obtain more accurate, evidence-based decisions.

Project description:Background:Improving all aspects of physical function is an important goal of chronic pain management. Few studies follow recent guidelines to comprehensively assess physical function via patient-reported, performance-based, and objective/ambulatory measures. Purpose:To test 1) the interrelation between the 3 types of physical function measurement and 2) the association between psychosocial factors and each type of physical function measurement. Methods:Patients with chronic pain (N=79) completed measures of: 1) physical function (patient-reported disability; performance-based 6-minute walk-test; objective accelerometer step count); 2) pain and non-adaptive coping (pain during rest and activity, pain-catastrophizing, kinesiophobia); 3) adaptive coping (mindfulness, general coping, pain-resilience); and 4) social-emotional dysfunction (anxiety, depression, social isolation and emotional support). First, we tested the interrelation among the 3 aspects of physical function. Second, we used structural equation modeling to test associations between psychosocial factors (pain and non-adaptive coping, adaptive coping, and social-emotional dysfunction) and each measurement of physical function. Results:Performance-based and objective physical function were significantly interrelated (r=0.48, p<0.001) but did not correlate with patient-reported disability. Pain and non-adaptive coping (?=0.68, p<0.001), adaptive coping (?=-0.65, p<0.001) and social-emotional dysfunction (?=0.65, p<0.001) were associated with patient-reported disability but not to performance-based or objective physical function (ps>0.1). Conclusion:Results suggest that patient-reported physical function may provide limited information about patients' physical capacity or ambulatory activity. While pain and non-adaptive reactions to it, adaptive coping, and social-emotional dysfunction may potentially improve patient-reported physical function, additional targets may be needed to improve functional capacity and ambulatory activity. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03412916.

Dataset Information

Patient-specific reference values for objective physical function tests: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Publications

Patient-specific reference values for objective physical function tests: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets