Dataset Information

Relative contributions of large-scale and wedgelet currents in the substorm current wedge.

ABSTRACT: We examined how much large-scale and localized upward and downward currents contribute to the substorm current wedge (SCW), and how they evolve over time, using the THEMIS all-sky imagers (ASIs) and ground magnetometers. One type of events is dominated by a single large-scale wedge, with upward currents over the surge and broad downward currents poleward-eastward of the surge. The other type of events is a composite of large-scale wedge and wedgelets associated with streamers, with each wedgelet having comparable intensity to the large-scale wedge currents. Among 17 auroral substorms with wide ASI coverage, the composite current type is more frequent than the single large-scale wedge type. The dawn-dusk size of each wedgelet is?~?600 km in the ionosphere (~?3.2 R _E in the magnetotail, comparable to the flow channel size). We suggest that substorms have more than one type of SCW, and the composite current type is more frequent.

SUBMITTER: Nishimura Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7373217 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Relative contributions of large-scale and wedgelet currents in the substorm current wedge.

Nishimura Y Y Lyons L R LR Gabrielse C C Weygand J M JM Donovan E F EF Angelopoulos V V

Earth, planets, and space : EPS 20200720 1

We examined how much large-scale and localized upward and downward currents contribute to the substorm current wedge (SCW), and how they evolve over time, using the THEMIS all-sky imagers (ASIs) and ground magnetometers. One type of events is dominated by a single large-scale wedge, with upward currents over the surge and broad downward currents poleward-eastward of the surge. The other type of events is a composite of large-scale wedge and wedgelets associated with streamers, with each wedgelet ...[more]

PMID: 32728343

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo assess whether reimbursement for orthopaedic sports procedures adequately compensates for operative time and surgical complexity.MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all orthopedic sports medicine procedures performed greater than 150 times from 2016 to 2018 with regard to operative time, preoperative risk factors, morbidity, and mortality data. Physician work relative value units (wRVU) data were obtained from the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) fee schedule. The primary outcome was wRVU per minute operative time (wRVU/min). Linear regressions were used to assess wRVU, operative time, and wRVU/min.ResultsA total of 42 CPT codes, including 84,966 cases, were stratified into the top and bottom 50%, according to mean operative time, complications, mortality, reoperations, and readmissions. Mean wRVU/min was significantly lower for longer procedures (.153 vs .187; P = .02), and comparable with regard to ASA score, complications, mortality, readmissions, and reoperations. Arthroscopy reimbursed more (.187 vs .148 wRVU/min; P = .008), with lower complications (1.5 vs 2.6%; P = .115) and operative time (56.1 vs 82.8 min; P = .001) compared to open. Multivariate linear regression revealed that after adjusting for complication rate, there was a decrease of .054 wRVU/h (P = .026) and $116.90/hour less for every additional hour of operative time.ConclusionThe current 2020 RVU scale does not fairly compensate sports procedures with longer operative times. When examining the hourly reimbursement rates for the most commonly performed sports procedures, there is a significant trend toward lower reimbursement for longer procedures even after accounting for complication rates. Furthermore, procedures of the knee reimbursed at higher rates relative to the general pool of sports procedures and open procedures are compensated at a lower rate compared to arthroscopic procedures.

Dataset Information

Relative contributions of large-scale and wedgelet currents in the substorm current wedge.

Publications

Relative contributions of large-scale and wedgelet currents in the substorm current wedge.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets