Dataset Information

Modelling of neutrophil dynamics in children receiving busulfan or treosulfan for haematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Busulfan and treosulfan are cytotoxic agents used in the conditioning regime prior to paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). These agents cause suppression of myeloid cells leaving patients severely immunocompromised in the early post-HSCT period. The main objectives were: (i) to establish a mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model for the treatment and engraftment effects on neutrophil counts comparing busulfan and treosulfan-based conditioning, and (ii) to explore current dosing schedules with respect to time to HSCT.

Methods

Data on 126 patients, 72 receiving busulfan (7 months-18 years, 5.1-47.0 kg) and 54 treosulfan (4 months-17 years, 3.8-35.8 kg), were collected. In total, 8935 neutrophil count observations were recorded during the study period in addition to drug concentrations to develop a mechanistic PKPD model. Absolute neutrophil count profiles were modelled semimechanistically, accounting for transplant effects and differing set points pre- and post-transplant.

Results

PK were best described by 2-compartment models for both drugs. The Friberg semimechanistic neutropenia model was applied with a linear model for busulfan and a maximum efficacy model for treosulfan describing drug effects at various stages of neutrophil maturation. System parameters were consistent across both drugs. The HSCT was represented by an amount of progenitor cells enhancing the neutrophils' proliferation and maturation compartments. Alemtuzumab was found to enhance the proliferative rate under which the absolute neutrophil count begin to grow after HSCT.

Conclusion

A semimechanistic PKPD model linking exposure to either busulfan or treosulfan to the neutrophil reconstitution dynamics was successfully built. Alemtuzumab coadministration enhanced the neutrophil proliferative rate after HSCT. Treosulfan administration was suggested to be delayed with respect to time to HSCT, leaving less time between the end of the administration and stem cell infusion.

SUBMITTER: Solans BP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7373705 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Busulfan (BU) is widely used in conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The exposure-escalated BU directed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is extremely necessary for the patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies in order to diminish relapse, but it increases the risk of drug-induced toxicity. BU exposure, involved in the glutathione- (GSH-) glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) pathway and proinflammatory response, is associated with clinical outcomes after HSCT. However, the expression of genes in the GSH-GSTs pathway is regulated by NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) that can also alleviate inflammation. In this study, we evaluated the influence of NRF2 polymorphisms on BU exposure, proinflammatory cytokine levels, and clinical outcomes in HSCT patients. A total of 87 Chinese adult patients receiving twice-daily intravenous BU were enrolled. Compared with the patients carrying wild genotypes, those with NRF2 -617 CA/AA genotypes showed higher plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels, poorer overall survival (OS; RR = 3.91), and increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; HR = 4.17). High BU exposure [area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) > 9.27 mg/L × h)] was related to BU toxicities. Furthermore, NRF2 -617 CA/AA genotypes could significantly impact TRM (HR = 4.04; p = 0.0142) and OS (HR = 3.69; p = 0.0272) in the patients with high BU AUC. In vitro, we found that high exposure of endothelial cell (EC) to BU, in the absence of Nrf2, elicited the hyperstimulation of NF-κB-p65, accompanied with the elevated secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, and led to EC death. These results showed that NRF2 -617 CA/AA genotypes, correlated with high proinflammatory cytokine levels, could predict inferior outcomes in HSCT patients with high BU AUC. Thus, NRF2 -617 CA/AA genotyping combined with TDM would further optimize personalized BU dosing for sufficient efficacy and safety endpoint.

Project description:Haplo-identical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (haplo) and umbilical cord blood transplant supported by third-party CD34 cells (haplo-cord) are competing approaches to alternative donor transplant. We compared, in adults younger than age 60 years, the outcomes of 170 haplo at 1 institution with that of 137 haplo-cord at 2 other institutions. All received reduced intensity conditioning with fludarabine and melphalan ± total body irradiation. GVHD prophylaxis for haplo consisted of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate, whereas haplo-cord received antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. Haplo transplant used mostly bone marrow, and peripheral blood stem cells were used in haplo-cord transplants. Haplo-cord were older and had more advanced disease. Haplo-cord hastened median time to neutrophil (11 vs 18 days, P = .001) and platelet recovery (22 vs 25 days, P = .03). At 4 years, overall survival (OS) was 50% for haplo-cord vs 49% for haplo. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% for haplo-cord vs 45% for haplo. In multivariate analysis, the disease risk index was significant for OS (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.17; P = .00) and PFS. Total body irradiation was associated with decreased recurrence and improved PFS, age >40 with increased nonrelapse mortality. The type of transplant had no effect on OS, PFS, relapse, or nonrelapse mortality. Cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by day 100 was 16% after haplo-cord vs 33% after haplo (P < .0001), but grade 3-4 GVHD was similar. Chronic GVHD at 1 year was 4% after haplo-cord vs 16% after haplo (P < .0001). Haplo or haplo-cord results in similar and encouraging outcomes. Haplo-cord is associated with more rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery and lower acute and chronic GVHD. Institutional review board authorization for this retrospective study was obtained at each institution. Some patients participated in trials registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01810588 and NCT01050946.