Dataset Information

Development and validation of the first consensus gene-expression signature of operational tolerance in kidney transplantation, incorporating adjustment for immunosuppressive drug therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with "operational tolerance" (OT) maintain a functioning graft without immunosuppressive (IS) drugs, thus avoiding treatment complications. Nevertheless, IS drugs can influence gene-expression signatures aiming to identify OT among treated KTRs.

Methods

We compared five published signatures of OT in peripheral blood samples from 18 tolerant, 183 stable, and 34 chronic rejector KTRs, using gene-expression levels with and without adjustment for IS drugs and regularised logistic regression.

Findings

IS drugs explained up to 50% of the variability in gene-expression and 20-30% of the variability in the probability of OT predicted by signatures without drug adjustment. We present a parsimonious consensus gene-set to identify OT, derived from joint analysis of IS-drug-adjusted expression of five published signature gene-sets. This signature, including CD40, CTLA4, HSD11B1, IGKV4-1, MZB1, NR3C2, and RAB40C genes, showed an area under the curve 0⋅92 (95% confidence interval 0⋅88-0⋅94) in cross-validation and 0⋅97 (0⋅93-1⋅00) in six months follow-up samples.

Interpretation

We advocate including adjustment for IS drug therapy in the development stage of gene-expression signatures of OT to reduce the risk of capturing features of treatment, which could be lost following IS drug minimisation or withdrawal. Our signature, however, would require further validation in an independent dataset and a biomarker-led trial.

Funding

FP7-HEALTH-2012-INNOVATION-1 [305147:BIO-DrIM] (SC,IR-M,PM,DSt); MRC [G0801537/ID:88245] (MPH-F); MRC [MR/J006742/1] (IR-M); Guy's&StThomas' Charity [R080530]&[R090782]; CONICYT-Bicentennial-Becas-Chile (EN-L); EU:FP7/2007-2013 [HEALTH-F5-2010-260687: The ONE Study] (MPH-F); Czech Ministry of Health [NV19-06-00031] (OV); NIHR-BRC Guy's&StThomas' NHS Foundation Trust and KCL (SC); UK Clinical Research Networks [portfolio:7521].

SUBMITTER: Christakoudi S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7374249 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Survival of solid organ grafts depends on life-long immunosuppression, which results in increased rates of infection and malignancy. Induction of tolerance to allografts would represent the optimal solution for controlling both chronic rejection (CR) and side effects of immunosuppression. Although spontaneous ‘‘operational tolerance’’ can occur in human kidney transplantation, the lack of noninvasive peripheral blood biological markers of this rare phenomenon precludes the identification of potentially tolerant patients in whom immunosuppression could be tapered as well as the development of new tolerance inducing strategies. Here, the potential of high throughput microarray technology to decipher complex pathologies allowed us to study the peripheral blood specific gene expression profile and corresponding EASE molecular pathways associated to operational tolerance in a cohort of human kidney graft recipients. In comparison with patients with CR, tolerant patients displayed a set of 343 differentially expressed genes, mainly immune and defense genes, in their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), of which 223 were also different from healthy volunteers. Using the expression pattern of these 343 genes, we were able to classify correctly >80% of the patients in a cross-validation experiment and classified correctly all of the samples over time. Collectively, this study identifies a unique PBMC gene signature associated with human operational tolerance in kidney transplantation. 250 samples were analyzed, replicates included: some patients from the TOL and CR groups were sampled twice with an interval between the two different time points of at least 16 months (mean 25.8 months, range 16–31 months). All the samples were analyzed in duplicate or quadruplicate. 1. TOL (n = 21). patients with stable graft function (blood creatinemia<150 mmol/L, proteinuria<1 g/24 h) for at least 1 year (mean 6.4 years,range 1.6–17.2 years) after complete interruption of immunosuppressive therapy. 2. STA (n = 190). Patients with stable kidney graft function under immunosuppressive therapy. 3. CR (n = 31). Patients having a progressive degradation of their renal function (blood creatinemia ≥150 mmol/L, proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h). CR was diagnosed on a graft biopsy according to the updated Banff criteria. CR was defined by histological signs of chronic allograft arteriopathy (arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell infiltration) and/or transplant glomerulopathy with glomerular double contours. 4. HV (n = 8). Subjects having normal blood formulae and no infectious or other concomitant pathology for at least 6 months before the study.

Project description:BackgroundDespite advances in immune suppression, kidney allograft rejection and other injuries remain a significant clinical concern, particularly with regards to long-term allograft survival. Evaluation of immune activity can provide information about rejection status and help guide interventions to extend allograft life. Here, we describe the validation of a blood gene expression classifier developed to differentiate immune quiescence from both T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).MethodsA five-gene classifier (DCAF12, MARCH8, FLT3, IL1R2, and PDCD1) was developed on 56 peripheral blood samples and validated on two sample sets independent of the training cohort. The primary validation set comprised 98 quiescence samples and 18 rejection samples: seven TCMR, ten ABMR, and one mixed rejection. The second validation set included eight quiescence and 11 rejection samples: seven TCMR, two ABMR, and two mixed rejection. AlloSure donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was also evaluated.ResultsAlloMap Kidney classifier scores in the primary validation set differed significantly between quiescence (median, 9.49; IQR, 7.68-11.53) and rejection (median, 13.09; IQR, 11.25-15.28), with P<0.001. In the second validation set, the cohorts were statistically different (P=0.03) and the medians were similar to the primary validation set. The AUC for discriminating rejection from quiescence was 0.786 for the primary validation and 0.800 for the second validation. AlloMap Kidney results were not significantly correlated with AlloSure, although both were elevated in rejection. The ability to discriminate rejection from quiescence was improved when AlloSure and AlloMap Kidney were used together (AUC, 0.894).ConclusionValidation of AlloMap Kidney demonstrated the ability to differentiate between rejection and immune quiescence using a range of scores. The diagnostic performance suggests that assessment of the mechanisms of immunologic activity is complementary to allograft injury information derived from AlloSure dd-cfDNA. Together, these biomarkers offer a more comprehensive assessment of allograft health and immune quiescence.

Project description:Operational tolerance after solid organ transplantation is defined as stable graft acceptance without immunosuppression while maintaining normal immunocompetence against immunological insults. However, it is not clear yet which cellular and molecular pathways are driving tolerance in these patients and how this state can be induced in order to improve graft survival. Several transcriptomic analysis have shown that transcription signatures in blood can reflect the immunological state associated with operational tolerance in kidney transplant. Nonetheless, epigenetic dynamics orchestrating these transcription signatures have not yet been studied. Here, we performed genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation of kidney transplant recipients with chronic rejection and operational tolerance. Our data showed that chronic rejection and operational tolerance recipients have differential DNA methylation in 2737 genes, indicating that each patient group has a specific epigenetic signature associated with transplant outcome. In addition, we observed that operational tolerance is associated with DNA demethylation in genes involved in immune function, including B cell activation (e.g. ST6GAL1, MS4A1 and MEF2C) and the Th17 differentiation program (e.g. LY9 and BATF), while in CR patients is mostly associated intracellular signaling and ubiquitination pathways. Finally, we used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to select the more defining epigenetic changes associated with operational tolerance. By this method, we select 12 genomic regions specifically hypomethylated (HIVEP2, HOMER1, UTRN, PTPRO, SP100 and JAZF1) or hypermethylated (EMZ8, EZR-AS, WDR20, NADSYN1, TBCD and MED17) in tolerant patients. Analysis of these genes in stable transplant recipients with immunosuppression showed that these patients have a similar methylation signature to operational tolerance recipients. Overall, these results demonstrate that DNA methylation in blood can mirror the immune status associated with kidney transplant outcome and provides a starting point for understanding the epigenetic mechanisms associated with operational tolerance.