Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Structural differences between REM and non-REM dream reports assessed by graph analysis.


ABSTRACT: Dream reports collected after rapid eye movement sleep (REM) awakenings are, on average, longer, more vivid, bizarre, emotional and story-like compared to those collected after non-REM. However, a comparison of the word-to-word structural organization of dream reports is lacking, and traditional measures that distinguish REM and non-REM dreaming may be confounded by report length. This problem is amenable to the analysis of dream reports as non-semantic directed word graphs, which provide a structural assessment of oral reports, while controlling for individual differences in verbosity. Against this background, the present study had two main aims: Firstly, to investigate differences in graph structure between REM and non-REM dream reports, and secondly, to evaluate how non-semantic directed word graph analysis compares to the widely used measure of report length in dream analysis. To do this, we analyzed a set of 133 dream reports obtained from 20 participants in controlled laboratory awakenings from REM and N2 sleep. We found that: (1) graphs from REM sleep possess a larger connectedness compared to those from N2; (2) measures of graph structure can predict ratings of dream complexity, where increases in connectedness and decreases in randomness are observed in relation to increasing dream report complexity; and (3) measures of the Largest Connected Component of a graph can improve a model containing report length in predicting sleep stage and dream report complexity. These results indicate that dream reports sampled after REM awakening have on average a larger connectedness compared to those sampled after N2 (i.e. words recur with a longer range), a difference which appears to be related to underlying differences in dream complexity. Altogether, graph analysis represents a promising method for dream research, due to its automated nature and potential to complement report length in dream analysis.

SUBMITTER: Martin JM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7377375 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Structural differences between REM and non-REM dream reports assessed by graph analysis.

Martin Joshua M JM   Andriano Danyal Wainstein DW   Mota Natalia B NB   Mota-Rolim Sergio A SA   Araújo John Fontenele JF   Solms Mark M   Ribeiro Sidarta S  

PloS one 20200723 7


Dream reports collected after rapid eye movement sleep (REM) awakenings are, on average, longer, more vivid, bizarre, emotional and story-like compared to those collected after non-REM. However, a comparison of the word-to-word structural organization of dream reports is lacking, and traditional measures that distinguish REM and non-REM dreaming may be confounded by report length. This problem is amenable to the analysis of dream reports as non-semantic directed word graphs, which provide a stru  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3892182 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7481704 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3819526 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4415323 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7601812 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8273511 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC378563 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6088287 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5894125 | biostudies-literature
2012-05-31 | GSE38357 | GEO