Dataset Information

Risk factors associated with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Failure after pelvic irradiation in patients with Cervical Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Objective: Previous studies have shown that prophylactic extended-field irradiation can reduce para-aortic lymph node failure (PALNF) rates in patients with cervical cancer. As such, this type of irradiation may particularly benefit patients with a high risk of PALNF. In the present study, we analyzed the risk factors for PALNF in patients with cervical cancer treated with pelvic irradiation in order to identify potential indications of prophylactic extended-field irradiation. Methods: We evaluated patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB3-IIIC1 cervical cancer who were treated with definitive pelvic radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 2011 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for PALNF. Results: We included 572 patients in the study. The median follow-up period was 37.9 months. Eighteen patients (3.1%) first site of tumor relapse was the para-aortic lymph nodes, and thus showed PALNF. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, we identified two significant risk factors for PALNF: tumor extension to the pelvic wall (hazard ratio, HR 3.60, p=0.026) and ? 2 pelvic MLNs (HR 5.30, p=0.005). For patients with and without risk factors, the 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and PALNF rates were 77.3% and 90.1% (p<0.001), 56.4% and 83.1% (p<0.001), and 12.0% and 2.3% (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Tumor extension to the pelvic wall and ? 2 pelvic MLNs are positively associated with PALNF after pelvic irradiation in patients with cervical cancer. Further trials will be required to validate whether patients with these two risk factors may benefit from prophylactic extended-field irradiation.

SUBMITTER: Wang W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7378915 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk factors associated with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Failure after pelvic irradiation in patients with Cervical Cancer.

Wang Weiping W Wang Dunhuang D Liu Xiaoliang X Zhou Yuncan Y Ma Jiabin J Hou Xiaorong X Hu Ke K Zhang Fuquan F

Journal of Cancer 20200628 17

<b>Objective:</b> Previous studies have shown that prophylactic extended-field irradiation can reduce para-aortic lymph node failure (PALNF) rates in patients with cervical cancer. As such, this type of irradiation may particularly benefit patients with a high risk of PALNF. In the present study, we analyzed the risk factors for PALNF in patients with cervical cancer treated with pelvic irradiation in order to identify potential indications of prophylactic extended-field irradiation. <b>Methods: ...[more]

PMID: 32742457

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives: We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) at each anatomic location in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Methods: A primary cohort of 728 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy were retrospectively studied. All removed pelvic nodes (N=20,134) were pathologically examined. The risk factors for LNM in different anatomic regions (obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, and common iliac) were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analyses. Nomograms were generated from the primary cohort and validated in another external cohort (N=242). The performance of the nomogram was assessed by its calibration and discrimination. Overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with different LNM patterns were compared. Results: LNM was found in 266 (1.3%) removed nodes and 106 (14.6%) patients. The incidences of LNM at the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, common iliac, and parametrial regions were 8.5%, 5.4%, 4.7%, 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. Among others, tumour size and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), which are preoperatively assessable, were identified as independent risk factors of LNM in the common iliac region and the lower pelvis, respectively, and age was an additional independent risk factor of obturator LNM. The negative predictive values of tumour size <2 cm for common iliac LNM and negative LVSI combined with older age (> 50 years) for obturator LNM were 100% and 98.7%, respectively. A nomogram of these two factors showed good calibration and discrimination (concordance index, 0.761 in the primary cohort and 0.830 in validation cohort). The patients with common iliac LNM had poorer survival than those with LNM confined to the lower pelvis, while the differences in survival between patients with LNM confined to one node, one region or single side and those with more widely spreading LNM were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Tumour size, LVSI and age are region-specific risk factors for pelvic LNM in IB1 cervical cancer, which could be used to allocate the appropriate extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Project description:Clinical trials evaluating the benefit of pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) in the radiotherapeutic management of patients with higher-risk prostate cancer have limited the superior field border to the S1/S2 or L5/S1 interspace. However, imaging and surgical series have demonstrated a high frequency of prostatic lymph node (LN) drainage beyond these landmarks.To determine the patterns of radiographically defined abdominopelvic LN failures and their potential implications for PRT field design.During 1992-2008, 2694 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with prostate/seminal vesicle-only radiotherapy without PRT. Some 156 patients had their first failure within the abdominopelvic LNs, of whom 60 had isolated failures within the pelvic LNs.A radiologist reviewed all imaging and mapped each LN failure to a template consisting of 34 abdominopelvic LN stations.The median follow-up was 8.9 yr. Of patients who experienced first recurrence in the pelvic LNs (n=60), the common iliac station was involved in 55% (n=33) of patients, including 10% (n=6) who had isolated common iliac failures. Use of a PRT field superior border of L5/S1 would fully cover only 42% of the first recurrences among these patients. Extending the field to cover the common iliac stations would increase coverage to 93% of recurrences. The presence of T3/T4 disease and omission of androgen-deprivation therapy both independently conferred an approximate fivefold increase in the likelihood of having a common iliac LN failure. Use of imaging as a surrogate for LN involvement is the primary study limitation.Pelvic LN failures frequently occur superior to the commonly used L5/S1 landmark for PRT coverage, and use of ADT may be protective of more superior LN failures. The current RTOG 0924 trial is evaluating the benefit of PRT with extended superior coverage to L4/5 when possible, which, according to our data, should significantly improve the coverage of potential sites of failure.We looked at lymph node recurrence patterns after external beam radiotherapy of the prostate in men who did not have their lymph nodes treated. We found that there was a high incidence of pelvic lymph node recurrences above the internal and external iliac lymph node regions. Therefore, the current field recommendation for pelvic lymph nodes that stops at the superior border of the internal and external iliac vessels provides inadequate coverage of common sites of cancer recurrence, namely the common iliac lymph nodes.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Some studies have demonstrated that concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is an effective salvage treatment for isolated para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence. However, no studies have compared multi-treatment modalities, such as radiation therapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), surgery, chemotherapy, and best supportive care (BSC), across a sufficient number of patients with PALN recurrence. We thus aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of multi-treatment modalities for isolated PALN recurrence in uterine cervical cancer. METHODS:Records of 50 patients who were first diagnosed with isolated PALN recurrence after definitive cervical cancer treatment from 2002 to 2016 at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The initial definitive cervical cancer therapies included RT alone, CCRT, or surgery with or without post-operative RT. The median follow-up time was 33?months. The median age at recurrence diagnosis was 57?years (range, 26-84?years). The median duration between the end of initial treatment and recurrence was 10?months (range, 1-91?months). The median maximum metastatic lesion size was 17?mm (range, 8-60?mm). Twenty-four patients had one or two PALN metastases, while 26 had 3 or more. Eighteen patients were treated for recurrence with RT alone, seven with CCRT, three with surgery, 17 with chemotherapy, and five with BSC. Potential prognostic factors included histopathology, initial FIGO stage, initial treatment, age at recurrence, tumor markers (serum SCC-Ag and CEA) at recurrence, time to recurrence, maximum size of the metastatic lesion, number of metastases, and the recurrence treatment method. RESULTS:The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 47.0%. The 3-year OS rate of patients who underwent CCRT for recurrence was 85.7%; surgery, 66.7%; chemotherapy, 48.8%; RT, 41.3%; and BSC, 0% (p?=?0.014). Univariate analysis revealed that only the recurrence treatment method was significantly associated with OS. The 3-year local control rate (LCR) and progression free survival (PFS) rate for CCRT were 100 and 71.4%; for surgery, 100 and 66.7%; for chemotherapy, 33.6 and 13.7%; and for RT, 55.5 and 14.1%, respectively (LCR: p?=?0.028, PFS: p?=?0.059). The number of metastatic lesions, SCC-Ag levels and recurrence treatment method were significantly associated with LCR. Age at recurrence, SCC-Ag levels, and number of metastatic lesions were significantly associated with PFS. CONCLUSIONS:Although our patient cohort size was small, our results suggest that CCRT may be effective in preventing local disease recurrence in the PALN and may improve OS.

Project description:Background and objectives In patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate it. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched until January 2000 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting overall survivals, complication rates, and hazard ratios of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and those data were pooled. Results Twenty retrospective studies (1021 patients undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicates that participants undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy were associated with 5-year survival benefit, compared to those not receiving para-aortic lymphadenectomy (odds ratio = 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.05–6.78), but there was no significant difference in complication rate (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.46–2.08). Further analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy group showed that 5-year survival of the positive group with pathologically para-aortic lymph node metastasis was lower than that of the negative group (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.11–0.31). Moreover, complete resection (odds ratio = 5.26, 95% confidence interval: 2.02–13.69), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (≤4) (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.97–3.62), and medium-high differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.48–5.99) were protective factors for survival. Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastasis was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.10–3.10). Conclusion Para-aortic lymphadenectomy had promising clinical efficacy in prolonging survival rather than complication rate in patients with colorectal cancer and clinically diagnostic para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Further prospective studies should be performed. Trial registration PROSPERO: CRD42022379276. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-02908-y.

Dataset Information

Risk factors associated with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Failure after pelvic irradiation in patients with Cervical Cancer.

Publications

Risk factors associated with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Failure after pelvic irradiation in patients with Cervical Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets