Dataset Information

Applying experimental therapeutics to examine cognitive and chronological vulnerabilities as mediators of acute outcomes in cognitive-behavioral therapy and light therapy for winter depression.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We applied the experimental therapeutics approach to test whether acute treatment outcomes for winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) are mediated by a cognitive mechanism in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD) versus a chronobiologic mechanism in light therapy (LT).

Method

Currently depressed adults with major depression, recurrent with seasonal pattern (N = 177; 83.6% female, 92.1% non-Hispanic White, M age = 45.6) were randomized to 6 weeks of LT or group CBT-SAD. SAD symptoms were assessed weekly on the Structured Clinical Interview for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-SAD Version. At pre-, mid-, and posttreatment, participants completed measures of general depressogenic cognitions (Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale; DAS); SAD-specific negative cognitions (Seasonal Beliefs Questionnaire; SBQ); chronotype (Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire; MEQ); and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition).

Results

Parallel-process growth models showed evidence for hypothesized mechanisms. For SAD-specific negative cognitions (SBQ), both symptom measures showed (1) an effect of treatment group on the slope of the mediator, with CBT-SAD demonstrating greater decreases, and (2) an effect of the slope of the mediator on the slope of the outcome. These effects held for the SBQ but not the broader measure of depressogenic cognitions (DAS). For the chronotype measure (MEQ), treatment assignment affected change, whereby LT was associated with reduced "eveningness," but this was unrelated to change in symptoms.

Conclusions

CBT-SAD promoted decreases in SAD-specific negative cognitions, and these changes were related to decreases in symptoms. Consistent with the theory that LT corrects misaligned circadian rhythms, LT reduced eveningness, but this did not correspond to symptom improvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

SUBMITTER: Rohan KJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7384243 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a subtype of recurrent depression involving major depressive episodes during the fall and/or winter months that remit in the spring. The central public health challenge in the management of SAD is prevention of winter depression recurrence. Light therapy (LT) is the established and best available acute SAD treatment. However, long-term compliance with daily LT from first symptom through spontaneous springtime remission every fall/winter season is poor. Time-limited alternative treatments with effects that endure beyond the cessation of acute treatment are needed to prevent the annual recurrence of SAD.This is an NIMH-funded R01-level randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a novel, SAD-tailored cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBT) against LT in a head-to-head comparison on next winter outcomes. This project is designed to test for a clinically meaningful difference between CBT and LT on depression recurrence in the next winter (the primary outcome). This is a concurrent two-arm study that will randomize 160 currently symptomatic community adults with major depression, recurrent with seasonal pattern, to CBT or LT. After 6 weeks of treatment in the initial winter, participants are followed in the subsequent summer, the next winter, and two winters later. Key methodological issues surround timing study procedures for a predictably recurrent and time-limited disorder with a focus on long-term outcomes.The chosen design answers the primary question of whether prior exposure to CBT is associated with a substantially lower likelihood of depression recurrence the next winter than LT. This design does not test the relative contributions of the cognitive-behavioral treatment components vs. nonspecific factors to CBT's outcomes and is not adequately powered to test for differences or equivalence between cells at treatment endpoint. Alternative designs addressing these limitations would have required more patients, increased costs, and reduced power to detect a difference in the primary outcome.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01714050.

Project description:Objective: This study sought to characterize change mechanisms that underlie gastrointestinal (GI) symptom improvement in IBS patients undergoing two dosages of CBT for IBS as compared to a nondirective education/support (EDU) condition. Method: Data were collected in the context of a large clinical trial that randomized 436 Rome III-diagnosed IBS patients (Mage = 41, 80 % female) to standard, clinic-based CBT (S-CBT), a largely home-based version with minimal therapist contact (MC-CBT) or Education/Support that controlled for nonspecific effects. Outcome was measured with the IBS-version of the Clinical Global Improvement scale that was administered at Week 5 and 2-week posttreatment (Week 12). Potential mediators (IBS Self-efficacy (IBS-SE), pain catastrophizing, fear of GI symptoms, and treatment alliance were assessed at Weeks 3, 5, and 8 during treatment with the exception of treatment expectancy that was measured at the end of Session 1. Results: IBS-SE, a positive treatment expectancy for symptom improvement, and patient-therapist agreement on tasks for achieving goals mediated effects of CBT early in treatment (rapid response, RR) and at posttreatment. Notwithstanding their different intensities, both CBT conditions had comparable RR rates (43%-45%) and significantly greater than the EDU RR rate of 22%. While pain catastrophizing, fear of GI symptoms, and patient-therapist emotional bonding related to posttreatment symptom improvement, none of these hypothesized mediators explained differences between CBT and EDU, thereby lacking the mechanistic specificity of IBS-SE, task agreement, and treatment expectancy. Conclusion: Findings suggest that CBT-induced GI symptom improvement may be mediated by a constellation of CBT-specific (IBS-SE) and nonspecific (task agreement, treatment expectancy) processes that reciprocally influence each other in complex ways to catalyze, improve, and sustain IBS symptom relief. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).