Dataset Information

Analysis of indications for pulmonary peripheral lesions diagnosed using radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy.

ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to determine the indications for radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (rEBUS-D-TBLB) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) located at the bronchopulmonary segments and subsegments. Data collected from 774 patients who underwent rEBUS-D-TBLB for suspected PPL, including clinical information, distribution of lesions, diagnostic spectrum and diagnostic rate, were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to analyze the diagnostic yield of lesions in bronchopulmonary subsegments under the lesion diameter limit of 3 cm. In total, 802 lesions were found in 774 patients. The diagnostic yield of rEBUS-D-TBLB for all lesions was 67.18%. Overall, 362 cases of malignant disease and 158 cases of benign disease were diagnosed, with sensitivities of 70.98 and 79.00% respectively. Lesions were distributed throughout the 18 bronchopulmonary segments of the lungs. The bronchopulmonary segments with >5% of the majority of the discovered lesions were LB1+2, LB3, LB6, LB10, RB1-4 and RB9. The diagnostic yield of rEBUS-D-TBLB was found to be >65% for lesions located at LB3, RB1-3 and RB9. Further rEBUS-D-TBLB examinations of the LB1+2a, LB6a and RB4b segments produced diagnostic yields of 81.25, 66.67 and 71.43% respectively. Finally, at segment RB4a, rEBUS-D-TBLB examination was more effective for lesions with diameters >3 cm compared with lesions with diameters <3 cm. The diagnostic yields for PPL distributed at LB1+2a, LB3, LB6a, RB1-3, RB4a (diameter >3 cm), RB4b, and RB9 using rEBUS-D-TBLB were higher compared with for other segments, providing a theoretical basis for the clinical application of rEBUS-D-TBLB for the diagnosis of PPL in patients.

SUBMITTER: Guan SH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7388566 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analysis of indications for pulmonary peripheral lesions diagnosed using radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy.

Guan Shu-Hong SH Zhang Ming M Zhang Su-Juan SJ Zhang Qiu-Di QD Xu Qian-Qian QQ Zhou Jun J

Experimental and therapeutic medicine 20200512 2

The aim of the present study was to determine the indications for radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (rEBUS-D-TBLB) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) located at the bronchopulmonary segments and subsegments. Data collected from 774 patients who underwent rEBUS-D-TBLB for suspected PPL, including clinical information, distribution of lesions, diagnostic spectrum and diagnostic rate, were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, the ...[more]

PMID: 32765651

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) improves the diagnostic yield from peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). However, the small specimens obtained using small forceps through a guide sheath (GS) may impede diagnosis and molecular analysis. Here, we investigated the diagnostic significance of additional conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed data from 55 patients who underwent conventional TBLB after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB for PPL diagnosis. Procedures were performed on single PPLs with no visible lesions on bronchoscopy. In cases with inconclusive pathologic confirmation, final diagnoses were made based on pathologic specimens or clinical observations. RESULTS:The median size of the target lesions was 28?mm. The appearances on computed tomography images were solid (n = 45, 81.8%), part-solid (n = 7, 12.7%), and cavitary nodules (n = 3, 5.5%). A computed tomography bronchus sign was present in 35 (63.6%) cases, and a radial probe was positioned within target lesion in 32 (58.2%) cases. R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB was diagnostic in 30 (54.5%) patients, and subsequent conventional TBLB yielded additional diagnostic information in 8 (14.5%) patients. Probe positioning within target lesions and the outer margin of PPLs more than 1 cm from pleura were significantly associated with enhanced diagnostic yield from the combined procedures. In conventional TBLB, probe positioning within target lesions (75.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.004) and characteristic of nonsolid nodules (83.3% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with additional diagnostic utility. CONCLUSIONS:Conventional TBLB following R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB could be a useful procedure for diagnosing PPLs, especially for nonsolid nodules. KEY POINTS:Significant findings of the study: Additional conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB yielded an additional 14.5% diagnostic utility for peripheral pulmonary lesions. For conventional TBLB, probe positioning within target lesions and nonsolid nodules were significantly associated with additional diagnostic utility. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:Conventional TBLB with standard forceps after R-EBUS-GS-guided TBLB is an effective and economically accessible diagnostic tool for peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Project description:Background:Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a new technology that allows for unbiased detection of pathogens. However, there are few reports on mNGS of lung biopsy tissues for pulmonary infection diagnosis. In addition, radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) is widely used to detect peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), but it is rarely used in the diagnosis of peripheral lung infection. Objective:The present study aims to evaluate the combined application of R-EBUS-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and mNGS for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary infectious lesions. Methods:From July 2018 to April 2019, 121 patients from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital diagnosed with PPLs and lung infection were enrolled in this prospective randomized study . Once the lesion was located, either TBLB or R-EBUS-guided-TBLB was performed in randomly selected patients, and mNGS was applied for pathogen detection in lung biopsy tissues. The results of mNGS were compared between the TBLB group and R-EBUS-guided TBLB group. In addition, the clinical characteristics and EBUS images from 61 patients receiving bronchoscopy for peripheral lung infectious detection were analyzed and compared with the results of mNGS. Results:The positivity rate of mNGS in R-EBUS-guided TBLB was (78.7%, 48/61) that was significantly higher than (60.0%, 36/60) in the TBLB group. Difference in the position of R-EBUS probe and image characteristics of peripheral lung infectious lesions affected the positivity rate of mNGS. Tissue collected by R-EBUS within the lesion produced higher positivity rate than samples collected adjacent to the lesion (P=0.030, odds ratio 17.742; 95% confidence interval, from 1.325 to 237.645). Anechoic areas and luminant areas of ultrasonic image characteristics were correlated with lower positivity rate of mNGS (respectively, P=0.019, odds ratio 17.878; 95% confidence interval, from 1.595 to 200.399; P=0.042, odds ratio 16.745; 95% confidence interval, from 1.106 to 253.479). Conclusions:R-EBUS-guided TBLB is a safe and effective technique in the diagnosis of peripheral lung infectious lesions. R-EBUS significantly facilitates the accurate insertion of bronchoscope into the lesions, which improves positivity rate of mNGS analysis in pathogen detection. The R-EBUS probe position within lesion produced a higher positivity rate of mNGS analysis. Nevertheless, the presence of anechoic and luminant areas on ultrasonic image was correlated with poor mNGS positivity rate.

Dataset Information

Analysis of indications for pulmonary peripheral lesions diagnosed using radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy.

Publications

Analysis of indications for pulmonary peripheral lesions diagnosed using radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets