Dataset Information

Faecal cytokine profiling as a marker of intestinal inflammation in acutely decompensated cirrhosis.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Gut dysbiosis and inflammation perpetuate loss of gut barrier integrity (GBI) and pathological bacterial translocation (BT) in cirrhosis, contributing to infection risk. Little is known about gut inflammation in cirrhosis and how this differs in acute decompensation (AD). We developed a novel approach to characterise intestinal immunopathology by quantifying faecal cytokines (FCs) and GBI markers.

Methods

Faeces and plasma were obtained from patients with stable cirrhosis (SC; n = 16), AD (n = 47), and healthy controls (HCs; n = 31). A panel of 15 cytokines and GBI markers, including intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein-2 (FABP2), d-lactate, and faecal calprotectin (FCAL), were quantified by electrochemiluminescence/ELISA. Correlations between analytes and clinical metadata with univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

Faecal (F) IL-1β, interferon gamma, tumour necrosis factor alpha, IL-21, IL-17A/F, and IL-22 were significantly elevated in AD vs. SC (q <0.01). F-IL-23 was significantly elevated in AD vs. HC (p = 0.0007). FABP2/d-lactate were significantly increased in faeces in AD vs. SC and AD vs. HC (p <0.0001) and in plasma (p = 0.0004; p = 0.011). F-FABP2 correlated most strongly with disease severity (Spearman's rho: Child-Pugh 0.466; p <0.0001; model for end-stage liver disease 0.488; p <0.0001). FCAL correlated with plasma IL-21, IL-1β, and IL-17F only and none of the faecal analytes. F-cytokines and F-GBI markers were more accurate than plasma in discriminating AD from SC.

Conclusions

FC profiling represents an innovative approach to investigating the localised intestinal cytokine micro-environment in cirrhosis. These data reveal that AD is associated with a highly inflamed and permeable gut barrier. FC profiles are very different from the classical innate-like features of systemic inflammation. There is non-specific upregulation of T_H1/T_H17 effector cytokines and those known to mediate intestinal barrier damage. This prevents mucosal healing in AD and further propagates BT and systemic inflammation.

Lay summary

The gut barrier is crucial in cirrhosis in preventing infection-causing bacteria that normally live in the gut from accessing the liver and other organs via the bloodstream. Herein, we characterised gut inflammation by measuring different markers in stool samples from patients at different stages of cirrhosis and comparing this to healthy people. These markers, when compared with equivalent markers usually measured in blood, were found to be very different in pattern and absolute levels, suggesting that there is significant gut inflammation in cirrhosis related to different immune system pathways to that seen outside of the gut. This provides new insights into gut-specific immune disturbances that predispose to complications of cirrhosis, and emphasises that a better understanding of the gut-liver axis is necessary to develop better targeted therapies.

SUBMITTER: Riva A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7391986 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis (AD) may or may not develop acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). ACLF is characterized by high-grade systemic inflammation, organ failures (OF) and high short-term mortality. Although patients with AD cirrhosis exhibit distinct clinical phenotypes at baseline, they have low short-term mortality, unless ACLF develops during follow-up. Because little is known about the association of profile of systemic inflammation with clinical phenotypes of patients with AD cirrhosis, we aimed to investigate a battery of markers of systemic inflammation in these patients. Methods: Upon hospital admission baseline plasma levels of 15 markers (cytokines, chemokines, and oxidized albumin) were measured in 40 healthy controls, 39 compensated cirrhosis, 342 AD cirrhosis, and 161 ACLF. According to EASL-CLIF criteria, AD cirrhosis was divided into three distinct clinical phenotypes (AD-1: Creatinine<1.5, no HE, no OF; AD-2: creatinine 1.5-2, and or HE grade I/II, no OF; AD-3: Creatinine<1.5, no HE, non-renal OF). Results: Most markers were slightly abnormal in compensated cirrhosis, but markedly increased in AD. Patients with ACLF exhibited the largest number of abnormal markers, indicating "full-blown" systemic inflammation (all markers). AD-patients exhibited distinct systemic inflammation profiles across three different clinical phenotypes. In each phenotype, activation of systemic inflammation was only partial (30% of the markers). Mortality related to each clinical AD-phenotype was significantly lower than mortality associated with ACLF (p < 0.0001 by gray test). Among AD-patients baseline systemic inflammation (especially IL-8, IL-6, IL-1ra, HNA2 independently associated) was more intense in those who had poor 28-day outcomes (ACLF, death) than those who did not experience these outcomes. Conclusions: Although AD-patients exhibit distinct profiles of systemic inflammation depending on their clinical phenotypes, all these patients have only partial activation of systemic inflammation. However, those with the most extended baseline systemic inflammation had the highest the risk of ACLF development and death.

Project description:Background & aimsBacterial infections in cirrhosis are associated with increased bleeding risk. To assess the factors responsible for bleeding tendency in patients with bacterial infections, we conducted a prospective study comparing all 3 aspects of hemostasis (platelets, coagulation, and fibrinolysis) in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis with vs. without bacterial infections.MethodsPrimary hemostasis assessment included whole blood platelet aggregation and von Willebrand factor (VWF). Coagulation assessment included procoagulant factors (fibrinogen, factor II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII), natural anticoagulants (protein C, protein S, antithrombin) and thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation test. Fibrinolysis assessment included fibrinolytic factors (plasminogen, t-PA, PAI-1, α2-AP, TAFIa/ai) and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP).ResultsEighty patients with decompensated cirrhosis were included (40 with and 40 without bacterial infections). Severity of cirrhosis and platelet count were comparable between groups. At baseline, patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections had significantly lower whole blood platelet aggregation, without significant differences in VWF. Regarding coagulation, bacterial infections were associated with reduced procoagulant factors VII and XII, and a significant reduction of all natural anticoagulants. However, thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation was comparable between the study groups. Finally, although mixed potentially hypo-fibrinolytic (lower plasminogen) and hyper-fibrinolytic (higher t-PA) changes were present in bacterial infections, a comparable level of PAP was detected in both groups. Upon resolution of infection (n = 29/40), platelet aggregation further deteriorated whereas coagulation and fibrinolysis factors returned to levels observed in patients without bacterial infections.ConclusionIn hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis, bacterial infections are associated with reduced whole blood platelet aggregation and a significant decrease of all natural anticoagulants, which may unbalance hemostasis and potentially increase the risk of both bleeding and thrombosis.Lay summaryBacterial infections are a common issue in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis (i.e. patients hospitalized due to severe complications of advanced chronic liver disease). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis who acquire infections may be at increased risk of bleeding complications following invasive procedures (that is a procedure in which the body is penetrated or entered, for instance by a needle or a tube). As bleeding complications in decompensated cirrhosis are associated with a high risk of further decompensation and death, there is an urgent need to understand the factors responsible for such increased bleeding tendency. Herein, we investigated the alterations of hemostasis (that is the physiological process responsible for clot formation and stability) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and bacterial infections. We found that development of bacterial infections in these patients is associated with alterations of hemostasis (particularly of platelets and clotting cascade) that may increase the risk of both bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Project description:Background and aimsCurrent prognostic scores of patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis (AD), particularly those with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), underestimate the risk of mortality. This is probably because systemic inflammation (SI), the major driver of AD/ACLF, is not reflected in the scores. SI induces metabolic changes, which impair delivery of the necessary energy for the immune reaction. This investigation aimed to identify metabolites associated with short-term (28-day) death and to design metabolomic prognostic models.MethodsTwo prospective multicentre large cohorts from Europe for investigating ACLF and development of ACLF, CANONIC (discovery, n=831) and PREDICT (validation, n=851), were explored by untargeted serum metabolomics to identify and validate metabolites which could allow improved prognostic modelling.ResultsThree prognostic metabolites strongly associated with death were selected to build the models. 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylglycol sulfate is a norepinephrine derivative, which may be derived from the brainstem response to SI. Additionally, galacturonic acid and hexanoylcarnitine are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Model 1 included only these three prognostic metabolites and age. Model 2 was built around 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylglycol sulfate, hexanoylcarnitine, bilirubin, international normalised ratio (INR) and age. In the discovery cohort, both models were more accurate in predicting death within 7, 14 and 28 days after admission compared with MELDNa score (C-index: 0.9267, 0.9002 and 0.8424, and 0.9369, 0.9206 and 0.8529, with model 1 and model 2, respectively). Similar results were found in the validation cohort (C-index: 0.940, 0.834 and 0.791, and 0.947, 0.857 and 0.810, with model 1 and model 2, respectively). Also, in ACLF, model 1 and model 2 outperformed MELDNa 7, 14 and 28 days after admission for prediction of mortality.ConclusionsModels including metabolites (CLIF-C MET) reflecting SI, mitochondrial dysfunction and sympathetic system activation are better predictors of short-term mortality than scores based only on organ dysfunction (eg, MELDNa), especially in patients with ACLF.