Dataset Information

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnostic Approach to Monogenic Cholestatic Liver Disorders-Single-Center Experience.

ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of panel-based NGS in the diagnostic approach of monogenic cholestatic liver diseases. Study design: Patients with diagnosis of chronic cholestatic liver disease of an unknown etiology underwent NGS of targeted genes panel. Group 1 included five patients (prospectively recruited) hospitalized from January to December 2017 while group 2 included seventeen patients (retrospectively recruited) hospitalized from 2010 to 2017 presenting with low-GGT PFIC phenotype (group 2a, 11 patients) or indeterminant cholestatic liver cirrhosis (group 2b, 6 patients). Results: Among 22 patients enrolled into the study, 21 various pathogenic variants (including 11 novel) in 5 different genes (including ABCB11, ABCB4, TJP2, DGUOK, CYP27A1) were identified. The molecular confirmation was obtained in 15 out of 22 patients (68%). In group 1, two out of five patients presented with low-GGT cholestasis, and were diagnosed with BSEP deficiency. Out of three patients presenting with high-GGT cholestasis, one patient was diagnosed with PFIC-3, and the remaining two were not molecularly diagnosed. In group 2a, seven out of eleven patients, were diagnosed with BSEP deficiency and two with TJP-2 deficiency. In group 2b, three out of six patients were molecularly diagnosed; one with PFIC-3, one with CYP27A1 deficiency, and one with DGUOK deficiency. Conclusions: Panel-based NGS appears to be a very useful tool in diagnosis of monogenic cholestatic liver disorders in cases when extrahepatic causes have been primarily excluded. NGS presented the highest diagnosis rate to identify the molecular background of cholestatic liver diseases presenting with a low-GGT PFIC phenotype.

SUBMITTER: Lipinski P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7393978 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnostic Approach to Monogenic Cholestatic Liver Disorders-Single-Center Experience.

Lipiński Patryk P Ciara Elżbieta E Jurkiewicz Dorota D Pollak Agnieszka A Wypchło Maria M Płoski Rafał R Cielecka-Kuszyk Joanna J Socha Piotr P Pawłowska Joanna J Jankowska Irena I

Frontiers in pediatrics 20200724

<b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the clinical utility of panel-based NGS in the diagnostic approach of monogenic cholestatic liver diseases. <b>Study design:</b> Patients with diagnosis of chronic cholestatic liver disease of an unknown etiology underwent NGS of targeted genes panel. Group 1 included five patients (prospectively recruited) hospitalized from January to December 2017 while group 2 included seventeen patients (retrospectively recruited) hospitalized from 2010 to 2017 presenting with l ...[more]

PMID: 32793533

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Objectives: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in Taiwan. With rapid advancement of targeted therapeutics in non-small cell lung cancers, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming an important tool for biomarker testing. In this study, we describe institutional experience of NGS analysis in non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: A cohort of 73 cases was identified from the institutional pathology archive in the period between November 2020 and December 2022. Results: Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type (91.8%). Most patients presented with stage IIIB and beyond (87.7%). Twenty-nine patients (39.7%) were evaluated at the time of initial diagnosis, while the others had received prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy. The most frequently mutated gene was EGFR (63%), and this was followed by TP53 (50.7%), KRAS (13.7%), RB1 (13.7%), and CDKN2A (13.7%). Clinically actionable mutations associated with a guideline-suggested targeted therapy were identified in 55 cases (75.3%) overall, and in 47.1% of cases excluding EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutation. Biomarkers other than EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutations were compared. Cases without TKI-sensitizing EGFR mutation had more level 1 or 2 biomarkers (excluding EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutations) than cases with TKI-sensitizing EGFR mutations (47.1% versus 20.1%, p = 0.016). Progressive disease was associated with co-occurrence of clinically actionable mutations (20.5% versus 0%, p < 0.05). Eight of the nine cases with co-occurring actionable genetic alternations had an EGFR mutation. After an NGS test, 46.1% of actionable or potentially actionable genetic alternations led to patients receiving a matched therapy. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that NGS analysis identifies therapeutic targets and may guide treatment strategies in NSCLC. NGS tests may be advantageous over multiple single-gene tests for optimization of treatment plans, especially for those with non-EGFR mutations or those with progressive disease.

Dataset Information

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnostic Approach to Monogenic Cholestatic Liver Disorders-Single-Center Experience.

Publications

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnostic Approach to Monogenic Cholestatic Liver Disorders-Single-Center Experience.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets