Dataset Information

Treatment of Unfavorable Bleeding Patterns in Contraceptive Implant Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate whether a short course of tamoxifen decreases bothersome bleeding in etonogestrel contraceptive implant users.

Methods

In a 90-day, double-blind randomized control trial, we enrolled etonogestrel implant users with frequent or prolonged bleeding or spotting. A sample size of 40 per group (N=80) was planned to compare 10 mg tamoxifen or placebo twice daily for 7 days after 3 consecutive days of bleeding or spotting no more than once per 30 days (maximum three treatments). Participants then entered a 90-day open-label study where all received tamoxifen if needed every 30 days (maximum three treatments). Participants used text messages to record daily bleeding patterns. Our primary outcome was the total number of consecutive amenorrhea days after the first treatment. Secondary outcomes included time to bleeding or spotting cessation and restart after first treatment, overall bleeding patterns, and satisfaction.

Results

From January 2017 to November 2018, 112 women enrolled in the study; 88 (79%) completed 90 days, and 79 (71%) completed 180 days. Participant characteristics did not differ between groups; mean age 24, majority identified as white not Hispanic with at least some college education. After the first treatment, the tamoxifen group reported an average of 9.8 (95% CI 4.6-15.0) more consecutive days of amenorrhea and more total days of no bleeding (amenorrhea or spotting) in the first 90 days (median 73.5 [range 24-89] vs 68 [range 11-81], P=.001). The placebo group showed a similar treatment benefit after first active use of tamoxifen in the open-label phase. At the end of the randomized study (first 90 days), women who received tamoxifen reported higher satisfaction (median 62 mm [range 16-100]) than those treated with placebo (46 mm [range 0-100]; P=.023).

Conclusion

A short course of tamoxifen reduces problematic bleeding and improves satisfaction in users of etonogestrel implants.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02903121.

SUBMITTER: Edelman AB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7395860 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo estimate whether serum etonogestrel concentrations influence bleeding patterns and related side effects in contraceptive implant users.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cross-sectional study with healthy, reproductive-aged women using etonogestrel implants for 12-36 months. Participants completed a brief questionnaire to assess their current bleeding pattern and any experience of abnormal bleeding with the implant. We then measured serum etonogestrel concentrations. We also reviewed the charts of participants to determine whether a prescription for oral contraceptive pills was ever given for treatment of implant-related bothersome bleeding. We performed multivariable logistic regression to test for associations between serum etonogestrel concentrations and both bleeding patterns and related side effects.ResultsWe enrolled 350 women, and 59.4% reported having experienced abnormal bleeding with the contraceptive implant. Only 14.9% of participants reported amenorrhea and 37.7% reported monthly periods. Among participants with reviewable medical records (n=253), roughly 20% had received a prescription for oral contraceptive pills during implant use. Increasing serum etonogestrel concentrations were significantly associated with increasing odds of reporting abnormal bleeding (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.005, P=.015) and increasing odds of having received an oral contraceptive pill prescription (aOR 1.008, P=.002). For every 100 pg/mL increase in serum etonogestrel concentration, contraceptive implant users in this study had 1.6 times the odds of reporting abnormal bleeding and 2.3 times the odds of having received a prescription as treatment for bothersome bleeding.ConclusionWe found both objective and subjective evidence that higher levels of progestin from the contraceptive implant were associated with bleeding side effects experienced by women in this study. Pharmacologic variation may influence the side effects women experience with a variety of hormonal contraceptive methods, in turn affecting patient satisfaction and discontinuation rates.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether ulipristal acetate reduces the number of bleeding days in etonogestrel implant users in a 30-day period as compared with placebo. METHODS:We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible participants were women aged 18-45 years with an etonogestrel implant in place for greater than 90 days and less than 3 years who reported greater than one bleeding episode in a 24-day period. Enrolled participants were randomized to receive 15 mg ulipristal acetate compared with an identical-appearing placebo daily for 7 days. Participants completed daily bleeding diaries using automated text messaging to evaluate whether ulipristal acetate reduces the number of bleeding days as compared with placebo. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction with bleeding and the effect of ulipristal acetate on ovulation status. A sample size of 52 per group (n=104) was planned, calculated with an effect size of a 30% reduction in bleeding days, SD of 10 days, and dropout of 15%. Our study was terminated early (N=65) as a result of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration hold, but power was sufficient for analysis. The effect of ulipristal acetate on ovulatory potential was evaluated in a subset with weekly serum progesterone. RESULTS:From May 2017 to January 2018, 65 women were allocated to receive 15 mg ulipristal acetate (n=32) or placebo (n=33) daily for 7 days. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Women randomized to ulipristal acetate reported 5 fewer days of bleeding over a 30-day reference period after treatment (P=.002). At the conclusion of the 30-day follow-up period, women in the ulipristal acetate group were more satisfied with their bleeding profile than the placebo group (87.5% vs 60%, respectively; P<.001). Serum progesterone levels were nonovulatory in a subset of each group (placebo group range: less than 0.2-1.3 ng/mL; ulipristal acetate group range: less than 0.2-4.4 ng/mL). CONCLUSION:Ulipristal acetate is well-tolerated and reduced the number of bleeding days in etonogestrel implant users in our study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03118297.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study assessed whether immediate postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants is associated with a difference in infant growth from birth to 6 months, onset of lactogenesis, or breastfeeding continuation at 3 and 6 months postpartum compared to delayed insertion at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum.Study designWe conducted a randomized trial of women in Uganda who desired contraceptive implants postpartum. We randomly assigned participants to receive either immediate (within 5 days of delivery) or delayed (6 to 8 weeks postpartum) insertion of a two-rod levonorgestrel contraceptive implant system. This is a prespecified secondary analysis evaluating breastfeeding outcomes. The primary outcome of this secondary analysis was change in infant weight; infants were weighed and measured at birth and 6 months. We used a validated questionnaire to assess onset of lactogenesis daily in person while participants were in the hospital, and then daily by phone after they left the hospital, until lactogenesis was documented. We used interviewer-administered questionnaires to assess breastfeeding continuation and concerns at 3 months and 6 months postpartum.ResultsAmong the 96 women randomized to the immediate group and the 87 women to the delayed group, the mean change in infant weight from birth to 6 months was similar between groups: 4632 g in the immediate group and 4407 g in the delayed group (p=.26). Among the 97 women who had not experienced lactogenesis prior to randomization, the median time to onset of lactogenesis did not differ significantly between the immediate and delayed groups (65 h versus 63 h; p=.84). Similar proportions of women in the immediate and delayed groups reported exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months (74% versus 71%; p=.74) and 6 months (48% versus 52%; p=.58).ConclusionWe found no association between the timing of postpartum initiation of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants and change in infant growth from birth to 6 months, onset of lactogenesis, or breastfeeding continuation at 3 or 6 months postpartum.ImplicationsThis study provides evidence that immediate postpartum initiation of contraception implants does not have a deleterious effect on infant growth or initiation or continuation of breastfeeding.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate topiramate and etonogestrel pharmacokinetic interactions in contraceptive implant users.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, noninferiority study with healthy women using etonogestrel implants continuously for 12-36 months. We measured baseline serum etonogestrel concentrations and then began a 6-week titrated topiramate regimen to standard migraine (100 mg/day) and epilepsy (400 mg/day) dosages. We repeated serum etonogestrel concentrations at 3 weeks (100 mg/day), 4 weeks (200 mg/day), and 6 weeks (400 mg/day) of topiramate therapy. We measured etonogestrel using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem, mass-spectrometry assay and tested for noninferiority (less than 30% decrease) in serum etonogestrel concentrations from baseline.ResultsWe enrolled 48 total participants; 32 completed 3 weeks, 31 completed 4 weeks, and 27 completed all follow-up visits. Participants' median age was 25.3 years (range 18.3-37.2), median body mass index (BMI) was 25.5 kg/m2 (range 18.7-42.2), and median duration of implant use was 24 months (range 12-36). Median etonogestrel concentrations were 142 pg/mL (range 76.2-771) at baseline, 126 pg/mL (range 72.4-585) at 3 weeks, 119 pg/mL (range 65.6-542) at 4 weeks, and 105 pg/mL (46.2-859) at 6 weeks. The 95% CIs for mean percent change in serum etonogestrel concentrations from baseline were [-37.3%+16.9%], [-45.4%+5.2%], and [-66.8%+24.8%] at 3 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks, respectively. Excluding one participant who had a serum etonogestrel concentration less than 90 pg/mL at baseline, 30.8% of participants (8/26, 95% CI 14.3-51.8%) had a serum etonogestrel concentration less than 90 pg/mL at 6 weeks.ConclusionThough only a mild enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug, concomitant topiramate use led to inferior serum etonogestrel concentrations among implant users, with a significant proportion reaching etonogestrel concentrations below the threshold for ovulatory suppression when taking antiepileptic dosages of topiramate.Funding sourceThis study was primarily funded through an Investigator-Initiated Study grant from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [MISP#57073]. This work was also supported by NIH/NCATS CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR001082 and NICHD K12 Women's Reproductive Health Research Scholar Program (grant number 5K12HD001271-18).Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03335163.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether serum etonogestrel concentrations in contraceptive implant users are associated with certain individual patient characteristics.Study designWe enrolled reproductive-age women using etonogestrel contraceptive implants between 12-36 months duration and measured a single serum etonogestrel concentration. Participants also completed a questionnaire about demographics.ResultsWe enrolled 350 participants; median age was 22.5 years (range 18.0-39.1), median months of implant use was 26.0 (range 12.0-36.0), and median body mass index was 25.7 kg/m2 (range 18.5-52.0). Our study population was primarily white/Caucasian (46.6% [163/350]) and Hispanic/Latina ethnicity (51.4% [180/350]). The median serum etonogestrel concentration was 137.4 pg/ml and etonogestrel concentrations varied 12.4 fold in the population (range 55.8-695.1 pg/ml). Using forward stepwise linear regression, months of implant use (β=-1.74, p<.001) and body mass index (β=-3.10, p<.001) were both significantly associated with decreased serum etonogestrel concentration with Black/African American race as a positive effect modifier (β=18.24, p=.099); R-squared for the model=0.13.ConclusionsIndividuals demonstrated a wide variability in serum etonogestrel concentrations, which can potentially affect side-effect profiles and efficacy. Increasing body mass index and longer duration of implant use were associated with small decreases in serum etonogestrel concentrations, while self-reported Black/African American race was associated with a non-significant increase. Despite these findings, most of etonogestrel variability was unaccounted for, suggesting that other clinical, pharmacologic, and genetic factors contributing to variability in etonogestrel concentrations remain to be determined.ImplicationsAlthough increases in body mass index are associated with lower etonogestrel levels in contraceptive implant users, the majority of women will maintain serum concentrations that consistently suppress ovulation. Furthermore, certain patient characteristics can only explain a small portion (13%) of the variability in serum etonogestrel levels among contraceptive implant users.

Project description:ObjectiveTo identify genetic variants that influence steady-state etonogestrel concentrations among contraceptive implant users.MethodsWe enrolled healthy, reproductive-age women in our pharmacogenomic study using etonogestrel implants for 12-36 months without concomitant use of hepatic enzyme inducers or inhibitors. We collected participant characteristics, measured serum etonogestrel concentrations, and genotyped each participant for 120 single nucleotide variants in 14 genes encoding proteins involved in steroid hormone (ie, estrogens, progestins) metabolism, regulation, or function. We performed generalized linear modeling to identify genetic variants associated with steady-state etonogestrel concentrations.ResultsWe enrolled 350 women, who had a median serum etonogestrel concentration of 137.4 pg/mL (range 55.8-695.1). Our final generalized linear model contained three genetic variants associated with serum etonogestrel concentrations: NR1I2(PXR) rs2461817 (β=13.36, P=.005), PGR rs537681 (β=-29.77, P=.007), and CYP3A7*1C (β=-35.06, P=.025). Variant allele frequencies were 69.4%, 84.9%, and 5.1%, respectively. Our linear model also contained two nongenetic factors associated with etonogestrel concentrations: body mass index (BMI) (β=-3.08, P=7.0×10) and duration of implant use (β=-1.60, P=5.8×10); R for the model =0.17.ConclusionOnly BMI and duration of implant use remained significantly associated with steady-state etonogestrel concentrations. Of the three novel genetic associations found, one variant associated with increased etonogestrel metabolism (CYP3A7*1C) causes adult expression of fetal CYP3A7 proteins and can consequently alter steroid hormone metabolism. Women with this variant may potentially have increased metabolism of all steroid hormones, as 27.8% (5/18) of CYP3A7*1C carriers had serum etonogestrel concentrations that fell below the threshold for consistent ovulatory suppression (less than 90 pg/mL). More pharmacogenomic investigations are needed to advance our understanding of how genetic variation can influence the effectiveness and safety of hormonal contraception, and lay the groundwork for personalized medicine approaches in women's health.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03092037.

Project description:ObjectiveSino-implant (II) is a contraceptive implant that had a commodity price one-third of the competing products a decade ago. To make Sino-implant (II) more widely available, we conducted a trial to collect safety and efficacy data required for World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification, a quality standard allowing global donors to procure a pharmaceutical product.Study designThis was a randomized controlled trial allocating 650 participants to either Sino-implant (II) or Jadelle®. Participants were seen at 1 and 6 months, and then semiannually. The primary efficacy measure was the pregnancy Pearl Index [number of pregnancies per 100 women-years (WY) of follow-up] in the Sino-implant (II) group during up to 4 years of implant use.ResultsFor the primary outcome, Sino-implant (II) had a 4-year Pearl Index of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.37) compared to 0.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-1.04) for Jadelle®. The Sino-implant (II) pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the fourth year (3.54 per 100 WY) than in the first 3 years combined (0.18 per 100 WY; p <.001). Total levonorgestrel concentrations were equivalent between groups at month 12, but were 19%, 22% and 32% lower in the Sino-implant (II) group at months 24, 36 and 48, respectively (p <.001 at each time point). Safety and acceptability of the two products were similar, while providers documented significantly higher breakage rates during removal of Sino-implant (II) (16.3% vs. 3.1%; p <.001).ConclusionBased on these results, WHO prequalified Sino-Implant (II) with a 3-year use label in June 2017, 2 years shorter than the 5-year duration of Jadelle®.ImplicationsWHO prequalification allows global donors to procure Sino-implant (II), which means women in many low resource countries will have greater access to highly effective and acceptable contraceptive implants. Our study noted important clinical differences, including shorter duration of high effectiveness with Sino-implant (II) when compared to the other available two-rod system, Jadelle®. Introduction strategies should include appropriate training on these differences.