Dataset Information

Left ventricular endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than conventional epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Epicardial pacing increases risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when pacing in proximity to scar. Endocardial pacing may be less arrhythmogenic as it preserves the physiological sequences of activation and repolarization. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to determine the relative arrhythmogenic risk of endocardial compared to epicardial pacing, and the role of the transmural gradient of action potential duration (APD) and pacing location relative to scar on arrhythmogenic risk during endocardial pacing. METHODS:Computational models of ICM patients (n = 24) were used to simulate left ventricular (LV) epicardial and endocardial pacing 0.2-3.5 cm from a scar. Mechanisms were investigated in idealized models of the ventricular wall and scar. Simulations were run with/without a 20-ms transmural APD gradient in the physiological direction and with the gradient inverted. Dispersion of repolarization was computed as a surrogate of VT risk. RESULTS:Patient-specific models with a physiological APD gradient predict that endocardial pacing decreases VT risk (34%; P <.05) compared to epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar (0.2 cm). Endocardial pacing location does not significantly affect VT risk, but epicardial pacing at 0.2 cm compared to 3.5 cm from scar increases it (P <.05). Inverting the transmural APD gradient reverses this trend. Idealized models predict that propagation in the direction opposite to APD gradient decreases VT risk. CONCLUSION:Endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than epicardial pacing when pacing proximal to scar and is less susceptible to pacing location relative to scar. The physiological repolarization sequence during endocardial pacing mechanistically explains reduced VT risk compared to epicardial pacing.

SUBMITTER: Mendonca Costa C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7397521 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Left ventricular endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than conventional epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar.

Mendonca Costa Caroline C Neic Aurel A Gillette Karli K Porter Bradley B Gould Justin J Sidhu Baldeep B Chen Zhong Z Elliott Mark M Mehta Vishal V Plank Gernot G Rinaldi C A CA Bishop Martin J MJ Niederer Steven A SA

Heart rhythm 20200406 8

<h4>Background</h4>Epicardial pacing increases risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when pacing in proximity to scar. Endocardial pacing may be less arrhythmogenic as it preserves the physiological sequences of activation and repolarization.<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to determine the relative arrhythmogenic risk of endocardial compared to epicardial pacing, and the role of the transmural gradient of action potential duration (AP ...[more]

PMID: 32272230

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsState-of-the-art pacemaker implantation technique in infants and small children consists of pace/sense electrodes attached to the epicardium and a pulse generator in the abdominal wall with a significant rate of dysfunction during growth, mostly attributable to lead failure. In order to overcome lead-related problems, feasibility of epicardial implantation of a leadless pacemaker at the left ventricular apex in a growing animal model was studied.Methods and resultsTen lambs (median body weight 26.8 kg) underwent epicardial implantation of a Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS) pacemaker (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, USA). Using a subxyphoid access, the Micra was introduced through a short, thick-walled tube to increase tissue contact and to prevent tilting from the epicardial surface. The Micra's proprietary delivery system was firmly pressed against the heart, while the Micra was pushed forward out of the sheath allowing the tines to stick into the left ventricular apical epimyocardium. Pacemakers were programmed to VVI 30/min mode. Pacemaker function and integrity was followed for 4 months after implantation. After implantation, median intrinsic R-wave amplitude was 5 mV [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-7.5], and median pacing impedance was 2235 Ω (IQR 1725-2500), while the median pacing threshold was 2.13 V (IQR 1.25-2.9) at 0.24 ms. During follow-up, 6/10 animals had a significant increase in pacing threshold with loss of capture at maximum output at 0.24 ms in 2/10 animals. After 4 months, median R-wave amplitude had dropped to 2.25 mV (IQR 1.2-3.6), median pacing impedance had decreased to 595 Ω (IQR 575-645), and median pacing threshold had increased to 3.3 V (IQR 1.8-4.5) at 0.24 ms. Explantation of one device revealed deep penetration of the Micra device into the myocardium.ConclusionShort-term results after epicardial implantation of the Micra TPS at the left ventricular apex in lambs were satisfying. During mid-term follow-up, however, pacing thresholds increased, resulting in loss of capture in 2/10 animals. Penetration of one device into the myocardium was of concern. The concept of epicardial leadless pacing seems very attractive, and the current shape of the Micra TPS makes the device unsuitable for epicardial placement in growing organisms.

Dataset Information

Left ventricular endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than conventional epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar.

Publications

Left ventricular endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than conventional epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets