Dataset Information

A computational study to model the effect of electrode-to-auditory nerve fiber distance on spectral resolution in cochlear implant.

ABSTRACT: Spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) has been widely used to evaluate the spectral resolution in cochlear implant (CI) recipients based on its strong correlation with speech perception performance. However, despite its usefulness for predicting speech perception outcomes, SRD performance exhibits large across-subject variabilities even among subjects implanted with the same CIs and sound processors. The potential factors of this observation include current spread, nerve survival, and CI mapping. Previous studies have found that the spectral resolution reduces with increasing distance of the stimulation electrode from the auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), attributable to increasing current spread. However, it remains unclear whether the spread of excitation is the only cause of the observation, or whether other factors such as temporal interaction also contribute to it. In this study, we used a computational model to investigate channel interaction upon non-simultaneous stimulation with respect to the electrode-ANF distance, and evaluated the SRD performance for five electrode-ANF distances. The SRD performance was determined based on the similarity between two neurograms in response to standard and inverted stimuli and used to evaluate the spectral resolution in the computational model. The spread of excitation was observed to increase with increasing electrode-ANF distance, consistent with previous findings. Additionally, the preceding pulses delivered from neighboring channels induced a channel interaction that either inhibited or facilitated the neural responses to subsequent pulses depending on the electrode-ANF distance. The SRD performance was also found to decrease with increasing electrode-ANF distance. The findings of this study suggest that variation of the neural responses (inhibition or facilitation) with the electrode-ANF distance in CI users may cause spectral smearing, and hence poor spectral resolution. A computational model such as that used in this study is a useful tool for understanding the neural factors related to CI outcomes, such as cannot be accomplished by behavioral studies alone.

SUBMITTER: Yang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7398541 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A computational study to model the effect of electrode-to-auditory nerve fiber distance on spectral resolution in cochlear implant.

Yang Hyejin H Won Jong Ho JH Choi Inyong I Woo Jihwan J

PloS one 20200803 8

Spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) has been widely used to evaluate the spectral resolution in cochlear implant (CI) recipients based on its strong correlation with speech perception performance. However, despite its usefulness for predicting speech perception outcomes, SRD performance exhibits large across-subject variabilities even among subjects implanted with the same CIs and sound processors. The potential factors of this observation include current spread, nerve survival, and CI mapping. ...[more]

PMID: 32745116

Similar Datasets

Project description:The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the absence of fine spectro-temporal cues may contribute to poorer performance in noise, especially when the noise is dynamic (e.g., competing speaker or modulated noise). Here we report on sentence recognition by cochlear implant users and by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant, in the presence of steady or square-wave modulated speech-shaped noise. Implant users were tested using their everyday, clinically assigned speech processors. In the acoustic simulation, normal-hearing listeners were tested for different degrees of spectral resolution (16, eight, or four channels) and spectral smearing (carrier filter slopes of -24 or -6 dB/octave). For modulated noise, normal-hearing listeners experienced significant release from masking when the original, unprocessed speech was presented (which preserved the spectro-temporal fine structure), while cochlear implant users experienced no release from masking. As the spectral resolution was reduced, normal-hearing listeners' release from masking gradually diminished. Release from masking was further reduced as the degree of spectral smearing increased. Interestingly, the mean speech recognition thresholds of implant users were very close to those of normal-hearing subjects listening to four-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. Also, the best cochlear implant listeners performed like normal-hearing subjects listening to eight- to 16-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. These findings suggest that implant users' susceptibility to noise may be caused by the reduced spectral resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with channel interaction. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral channels as well as reduce channel interactions may improve implant performance in noise, especially for temporally modulated noise.

Project description:Multielectrode cochlear implants rely on differential stimulation of the cochlear nerve for presenting the brain with the spectral and timing information required to understand speech. In implant patients, the degree of overlap among cochlear nerve fibers stimulated by the different electrodes constitutes the electrode interaction. Electrode interaction degrades the spectral resolution of the implant's stimulus. We sought to define electrode interaction in a cohort of pediatric cochlear implant subjects as a function of both stimulus intensity and electrode location along the array. The 27 pediatric subjects that completed the study were implanted with either the Clarion Hi-Focus array with or without positioner, the Nucleus 24 Contour array, or the Nucleus 24 Straight array. All but two of the patients had congenital hearing loss, and none of the patients had meningitis prior to the onset of deafness. The cochlear nerve response was measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). A forward masking protocol was used such that a probe stimulus electrode remained fixed while a preceding masker was moved across the array. Electrode interaction was estimated by measuring the unmasked probe response minus the masked probe response. Three probe locations and three probe intensities were examined for each subject. At all probe locations, electrode interaction increased as probe intensity increased (p < 0.05). Interaction at the basal probe was less than that at either the middle or apical probe locations (p < 0.05), and significant correlation found between probe distance from the basal end of the array and electrode interaction (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate that in this cohort of pediatric subjects, electrode interaction depended on both stimulus intensity and probe location. Implications of these findings on future implant array design and current implant fitting strategies are discussed. The impact of electrode interaction on implant performance is yet to be elucidated.

Project description:Introduction and objectivesAmong cochlear implant candidates, an increasing number of patients are presenting with residual acoustic hearing. To monitor the postoperative course of structural and functional preservation of the cochlea, a reliable objective biomarker would be desirable. Recently, impedance telemetry has gained increasing attention in this field. The aim of this study was to investigate the postoperative course of the residual acoustic hearing and clinical impedance in patients with long electrode arrays and to explore the applicability of impedance telemetry for monitoring residual hearing.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed records of 42 cochlear implant recipients with residual hearing covering a median postoperative follow-up of 25 months with repeated simultaneous pure tone audiometry and impedance telemetry. We used a linear mixed-effects model to estimate the relation between clinical electrode impedance and residual hearing. Besides the clinical impedance, the follow-up time, side of implantation, gender, and age at implantation were included as fixed effects. An interaction term between impedance and follow-up time, as well as subject-level random intercepts and slopes, were included.ResultsLoss of residual hearing occurred either during surgery or within the first 6 post-operative months. Electrode contacts inserted further apically (i.e., deeper) had higher impedances, independent of residual hearing. The highest impedances were measured 1 month postoperatively and gradually decreased over time. Basal electrodes were more likely to maintain higher impedance. Follow-up time was significantly associated with residual hearing. Regardless of the time, we found that a 1 kΩ increase in clinical impedance was associated with a 4.4 dB deterioration of residual hearing (p < 0.001).ConclusionPure tone audiometry is the current gold standard for monitoring postoperative residual hearing. However, the association of clinical impedances with residual hearing thresholds found in our study could potentially be exploited for objective monitoring using impedance telemetry. Further analysis including near-field related impedance components could be performed for improved specificity to local immune responses.

Dataset Information

A computational study to model the effect of electrode-to-auditory nerve fiber distance on spectral resolution in cochlear implant.

Publications

A computational study to model the effect of electrode-to-auditory nerve fiber distance on spectral resolution in cochlear implant.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets