Dataset Information

Automated Bird Counting with Deep Learning for Regional Bird Distribution Mapping.

ABSTRACT: A challenging problem in the field of avian ecology is deriving information on bird population movement trends. This necessitates the regular counting of birds which is usually not an easily-achievable task. A promising attempt towards solving the bird counting problem in a more consistent and fast way is to predict the number of birds in different regions from their photos. For this purpose, we exploit the ability of computers to learn from past data through deep learning which has been a leading sub-field of AI for image understanding. Our data source is a collection of on-ground photos taken during our long run of birding activity. We employ several state-of-the-art generic object-detection algorithms to learn to detect birds, each being a member of one of the 38 identified species, in natural scenes. The experiments revealed that computer-aided counting outperformed the manual counting with respect to both accuracy and time. As a real-world application of image-based bird counting, we prepared the spatial bird order distribution and species diversity maps of Turkey by utilizing the geographic information system (GIS) technology. Our results suggested that deep learning can assist humans in bird monitoring activities and increase citizen scientists' participation in large-scale bird surveys.

SUBMITTER: Akcay HG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7401518 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Automated Bird Counting with Deep Learning for Regional Bird Distribution Mapping.

Akçay Hüseyin Gökhan HG Kabasakal Bekir B Aksu Duygugül D Demir Nusret N Öz Melih M Erdoğan Ali A

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI 20200716 7

A challenging problem in the field of avian ecology is deriving information on bird population movement trends. This necessitates the regular counting of birds which is usually not an easily-achievable task. A promising attempt towards solving the bird counting problem in a more consistent and fast way is to predict the number of birds in different regions from their photos. For this purpose, we exploit the ability of computers to learn from past data through deep learning which has been a leadi ...[more]

PMID: 32708550

Similar Datasets

Project description:Tissue phase mapping (TPM) is an MRI technique for quantification of regional biventricular myocardial velocities. Despite its potential, clinical use is limited due to the requisite labor-intensive manual segmentation of cardiac contours for all time frames. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) network for automated segmentation of TPM images, without significant loss in segmentation and myocardial velocity quantification accuracy compared with manual segmentation. We implemented a multi-channel 3D (three dimensional; 2D + time) dense U-Net that trained on magnitude and phase images and combined cross-entropy, Dice, and Hausdorff distance loss terms to improve the segmentation accuracy and suppress unnatural boundaries. The dense U-Net was trained and tested with 150 multi-slice, multi-phase TPM scans (114 scans for training, 36 for testing) from 99 heart transplant patients (44 females, 1-4 scans/patient), where the magnitude and velocity-encoded (Vx , Vy , Vz ) images were used as input and the corresponding manual segmentation masks were used as reference. The accuracy of DL segmentation was evaluated using quantitative metrics (Dice scores, Hausdorff distance) and linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses on the resulting peak radial and longitudinal velocities (Vr and Vz ). The mean segmentation time was about 2 h per patient for manual and 1.9 ± 0.3 s for DL. Our network produced good accuracy (median Dice = 0.85 for left ventricle (LV), 0.64 for right ventricle (RV), Hausdorff distance = 3.17 pixels) compared with manual segmentation. Peak Vr and Vz measured from manual and DL segmentations were strongly correlated (R ≥ 0.88) and in good agreement with manual analysis (mean difference and limits of agreement for Vz and Vr were -0.05 ± 0.98 cm/s and -0.06 ± 1.18 cm/s for LV, and -0.21 ± 2.33 cm/s and 0.46 ± 4.00 cm/s for RV, respectively). The proposed multi-channel 3D dense U-Net was capable of reducing the segmentation time by 3,600-fold, without significant loss in accuracy in tissue velocity measurements.

Dataset Information

Automated Bird Counting with Deep Learning for Regional Bird Distribution Mapping.

Publications

Automated Bird Counting with Deep Learning for Regional Bird Distribution Mapping.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets